You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Tom Storm

Comments

Yes, that seems fair. I guess the more observant among us would probably say: surely no one would willingly go against God if they had certain knowled...
January 18, 2026 at 23:21
Absolutely and it's clear that this is your argument. No problem there. Yes. For me, it has always been a question of whether we have good reason to a...
January 18, 2026 at 22:18
Now, I’m no Thomist, but if goodness flows from God’s very nature, then, I suspect, normativity isn’t removed because acting rightly is acting in acco...
January 18, 2026 at 21:46
Forgive my meandering response. From what I read, that all seems fair and seems to come down to “a book says a thing”. I wonder though, even if there ...
January 18, 2026 at 21:05
Well, if for classical theism this is how God is understood then some of the traditional arguments put forward by atheists fall short. A theist might ...
January 18, 2026 at 01:00
There’s probably a more charitable way to look at this: if we read it as suggesting that the origins of moral behavior may be found in our evolving to...
January 17, 2026 at 23:20
Can I check something with you? Whether we ‘ought’ to obey God could be held to depend on the language game we are playing. The original claim assumes...
January 17, 2026 at 23:11
Interesting this hasn't come up. Can we say the same about God? Even if we could demonstrate that God exists, it does not follow that we ought to act ...
January 17, 2026 at 22:54
A digression, perhaps and forgive my tone which is not intended to be strident. Are there not innumerable contributions on variations of this matter a...
January 17, 2026 at 22:19
I think this is understood. I have also learned this from some people I know and how different they are on line compared to real life. Anonymity promo...
January 17, 2026 at 21:28
And part of the problem is that so many members of the public no longer seem to care for truth or accuracy, or only in 'my truth,' while the rest seem...
January 17, 2026 at 06:49
:up: :up: The idea that formed the basis of our discussion, that empathy came first and then religion, doesn’t really hold up as a critique or as an a...
January 17, 2026 at 05:05
Where did I say they all blindly follow Dawkins? I’ve been involved in freethinker atheist circles for 40 years; there is a significant percentage who...
January 17, 2026 at 04:24
I like this formulation a lot.
January 16, 2026 at 21:37
I am an atheist, I am not saying this as a believer. I am trying to provide a basic sketch of classical theism’s understanding of the good. It's usefu...
January 16, 2026 at 21:32
There's not staggeringly different, that’s why I mentioned famous and popular publishers from 100 years ago who printed lies and defamations every sin...
January 16, 2026 at 06:15
I don’t think that’s right by their reasoning because under this view (Calvin, Anslem, Aquinas) all goodness, in whatever form it takes, is grounded i...
January 16, 2026 at 03:52
Yes, although some religious folk will say that since goodness emanates directly from God’s nature, we are good because it reflects God’s nature, with...
January 16, 2026 at 02:03
There's always been a war on truth in the media, a feature I’ve observed for decades, and it was even worse when we had consistent enemies like godles...
January 15, 2026 at 07:34
Yes this would seem to be right but I suspect cunning arguments are available against this position. They may already have been stated, but I dip in a...
January 15, 2026 at 05:14
Got ya. :up::up:
January 14, 2026 at 22:15
Nice. Thanks.
January 14, 2026 at 22:12
That's a bit pf a tantalising idea. Are there 2 or 3 aspects of this particularly you can dot point?
January 14, 2026 at 21:57
As far as I can understand this I would be sympathetic to Hegel, a less essentialist perspective. Was this view a refinement built upon Kant?
January 14, 2026 at 20:41
So are you saying this is your interpretation of what you saw? Or are you saying that your church members and church leaders also aimed to provide fal...
January 14, 2026 at 19:32
I have done more than read, I've seen it. And as I said, there are some who behave as you say but it often goes in reverse. No, it isn’t different wor...
January 14, 2026 at 19:11
I don't think religion tries to achieve that; that’s a specific description a sceptic might provide. Firstly, there are religions that do not work aro...
January 14, 2026 at 01:46
Ah huh! Good line by the way. These days it seems that some people are more uncomfortable with golden retrievers on fire than people.
January 13, 2026 at 06:12
Is that accurate? Is that Black Notebokk stuff? Well if God is happy with this who are we not to share the enthusiasm?
January 13, 2026 at 05:13
Yep, there's a power in shared worldviews, motivated reasoning, and magical thinking. I can think of subcultures here (I’m sure you can too) who claim...
January 13, 2026 at 00:26
Tribalism
January 13, 2026 at 00:13
Baptists are a broad church unto themselves. They allow individual churches to set interpretive values. I grew up in that tradition, and my Baptists w...
January 13, 2026 at 00:05
Is that yours? I like it. The interesting thing is that we don’t agree on those partials. Maybe if you put everyone's partials together, you get the w...
January 12, 2026 at 23:59
Let’s hope so. Would your assessment be that the President and his backers are working on complete military control so that he/they can retain power i...
January 12, 2026 at 21:12
So are you saying that Trump does not currently have enough key military personnel aligned with his administration to enforce his authority beyond con...
January 12, 2026 at 19:11
Me too. Not sure if they make them well or not. I think I don't watch them as well as I used to. I think so. I was 45 when I turned 12...
January 12, 2026 at 08:42
How long do you think some parts of the US military elite will hold out against a maverick US president? As far as I can tell, apart from them, there'...
January 12, 2026 at 02:26
That’s more my speed.
January 12, 2026 at 00:35
To some extent your response here also seems pragmatic.
January 12, 2026 at 00:28
Reading Nicomachean Ethics by Aristotle. A fairly easy read, although I can’t claim to remember it all as I go along. It reads like the eccentric lect...
January 11, 2026 at 22:05
But as I wrote, it doesn’t matter if you are part of an intersubjective community. Perennialism doesn’t avoid this either - the work of finding the On...
January 10, 2026 at 22:46
Why do religions fail? I am not sure that they do. Much depends on what “failure” is taken to mean. Does it matter, for example, that within Christian...
January 10, 2026 at 22:25
That's a nice way of framing it.
January 10, 2026 at 21:35
Yes, this tension could label Kant as dogmatic on noumena: he is meant to remain entirely agnostic, yet he slips into asserting what the noumenon cann...
January 10, 2026 at 07:52
I screwed up the sentence. I meant that phenomena are the product or our sense and cognitive apparatus. I fixed my syntax.
January 10, 2026 at 06:59
That's a lot to get one's head around, thank you. This may be a naive question, but it sometimes seems to me that noumena represent a compromise betwe...
January 10, 2026 at 05:37
Best wishes, Joshs.
January 10, 2026 at 01:10
Fair enough. My instinct is that separation of powers only work by agreement. They are not magic spells and in the end what the military chooses will ...
January 10, 2026 at 01:04
Do you think America has become an autocracy (with more to come) and that Trump and/or his cronies are here to stay? Either ignoring future elections ...
January 09, 2026 at 23:42