You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Tom Storm

Comments

Nor me. But what we do have is free medical and hospital treatment and a guaranteed welfare payments and pensions. I work in the area of addiction and...
January 08, 2026 at 19:29
This interested me although we may have moved past it. Is Trump immoral, should we take a stand against him and his cronies? I ask because it seems to...
January 08, 2026 at 05:18
I understand that Buckley took a very principled position on antisemitism in the Right and was instrumental in reforming American conservatism.
January 08, 2026 at 02:26
Whatever the issues may be, it seems pretty clear that left and right don’t see the same world or understand each other’s views very well. The only co...
January 08, 2026 at 02:23
Interesting. I would place him as a right-centrist, certainly not a communist. It’s amazing how McCarthyism continues to define American politics! Who...
January 08, 2026 at 00:49
Interesting well written OP I'm Australian so forgive my somewhat tangential response, but your OP does suggest some questions to me. Is there really ...
January 07, 2026 at 23:50
Interesting and an important point.
January 07, 2026 at 23:06
I’m not sure that’s my experience but maybe Australia is somewhat kinder. There are certainly neoliberal trends along those lines but also opportuniti...
January 07, 2026 at 06:16
Cool. I think what I needed from films was achieved in the 1980's and 1990's and now I just don't crave them or find them engaging. It's like a stage ...
January 07, 2026 at 05:58
Fair enough. It would be odd if we all agreed on art. If BR came out today it wouldn't really interest me. When it came out it was a revelation and I ...
January 07, 2026 at 03:56
Fair enough. Sure. I am neither inclined to practice nor to theorise, but I am interested in understanding the range of perspectives out there. I find...
January 07, 2026 at 00:37
The theory; trying to make sense of Husserl or Merleau-Ponty is very difficult, especially if, like me, you don’t particularly enjoy theory and have n...
January 06, 2026 at 23:30
This is one reason why it attracts me. If only it wasn't so fucking difficult. :wink:
January 06, 2026 at 22:57
Nice quote.
January 06, 2026 at 20:55
Thanks for your detailed response. It all alludes to a broader perspective and reading than my own on this, so in reading you, it’s a bit like listeni...
January 06, 2026 at 20:29
Seems reasonable. Thanks.
January 06, 2026 at 20:21
Interesting. This analysis surprises me. I hadn't thought about science-idealists who reject models when they are uncertain. It does make sense.
January 06, 2026 at 20:17
Fuckin' weed smoking hippie! Pretty big in my city of five million as well. Of course, it’s mainly the middle classes and the literate blue-collar typ...
January 06, 2026 at 09:32
I find the implications of phenomenology for the question of dualism interesting but somewhat difficult to understand. I also note that there've been ...
January 06, 2026 at 09:17
But what is the transcendent ground of being; God, Brahman, the One, or all of the above? And how could we ever know that such a foundation exists? It...
January 06, 2026 at 08:51
You remind me of Searle too.
January 06, 2026 at 01:13
What about dingos and babies?
January 05, 2026 at 23:09
I'm interested in this paragraph. Forgive my meandering and uninitiated response. We often hear this kind of criticism of the present era from religio...
January 05, 2026 at 06:55
Got ya. Thanks. Or perhaps just evil (do we need ultimate?). It sounds like you might be recovering from a harsh form of Protestant Christianity and, ...
January 05, 2026 at 06:18
Midnight in Paris was ok. No Country for Old Men and The Killer were diverting but not exciting. I want the big electrical experince I got when I saw ...
January 04, 2026 at 22:43
I'm not sure I have faith in truth or ultimate goodness. A talking serpent and donkey wound almost as plausible. I wonder what ultimate goodness means...
January 04, 2026 at 22:29
Can't say I've seen a film I've enjoyed in around 25 years. My own theory is that for some of us only have a limited number of films we can watch befo...
January 04, 2026 at 22:06
But who are these originators? Can you actually sketch the process because it seems a bit vague? The founders are not generally in this vein: the Budd...
January 04, 2026 at 19:17
I’m sympathetic to this line of thinking, but I don’t think we have good reason to assume that any religion has a single, unified goal. One of my clos...
January 04, 2026 at 07:31
But isn’t that the question which matters? How do we cocreate our reality as opposed to see reality? Whether the question matters is a separate one. A...
January 04, 2026 at 00:39
I can see that. I’m no Kant expert but I was referring to that argument specifically. Mind you, if we what we see is phenomena not noumena then what m...
January 04, 2026 at 00:16
Thanks. :up: :up:
January 04, 2026 at 00:04
Kant’s concern was more structural and general: he focused on how the mind contributes to experience. Our sensibility provides raw intuitions, structu...
January 03, 2026 at 23:17
A question out of curiosity: do you have any views on the idea that certain spiritual states or "higher consciousness", might allow direct (whether pa...
January 03, 2026 at 22:29
I don't mind who gets implicated, as long as it's interesting. :wink:
January 03, 2026 at 22:25
I have sympathy for the position you are expounding. It's tricky stuff because to discuss it we are already deeply immersed in human framing, possibly...
January 01, 2026 at 02:06
I think you’re making the point that Haack argues: there is nothing intrinsic to the scientific method that other disciplines cannot also employ. We s...
December 31, 2025 at 22:12
Wasn't the Holocaust also a product of scientisitc thinking and misapplied rationalism with a technocratic final solution? Zygmunt Bauman ( a philosop...
December 31, 2025 at 22:07
We need a thread on this alone. :wink:
December 31, 2025 at 21:50
Sure but interestingly there are different views on the scientific method. Susan Haack (a philsophy of science and epistemology stalwart) takes the po...
December 31, 2025 at 21:48
Midnight is about four hours away. I live in the center of the city. Fireworks are set to go, and roads are blocked to vehicle traffic. Small children...
December 31, 2025 at 09:11
That’s a fun line, and I can see why you might lean that way, though it feels a bit slippery. Does science not rely on the assumptions mentioned above...
December 31, 2025 at 08:54
Isn't it the case that all epistemic frameworks rest on metaphysical commitments? Science provides a particularly clear illustration. Scientific inqui...
December 31, 2025 at 06:13
I hear you but I think K is being polemical here and is making an equivocation on the world naturalist. Yes he believes consciousness is natural and t...
December 31, 2025 at 01:22
Personally, I wouldn’t compare K with S. As already noted, K argues that mind-at-large is similar to Schopenhauer’s Will. But his view is still evolvi...
December 30, 2025 at 23:34
Interesting, I always assumed that binary, dualistic or black-and-white thinking was a human flaw and, perhaps, unnecessary. If we do privilege dualit...
December 30, 2025 at 04:59
I've also heard it argued that objects persist in idealism (not because a mind is always perceiving them) but because experience unfolds according to ...
December 30, 2025 at 03:17
Interesting idea for a thread. I’ve never been a science or math guy, so I don’t have strong views on these. I don’t know about the others, but this o...
December 30, 2025 at 02:17
Good question. Isn't the idea that the “world” we perceive is not independent matter imposing itself on us, but a manifestation of mind, or a universa...
December 30, 2025 at 01:44
Not sure I understand this but is the point that, at an ordinary level of thinking, dualities appear to us?
December 30, 2025 at 01:42