You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Tom Storm

Comments

Yes, that's my read too.
February 02, 2026 at 20:54
Yes, I knew people like this in the late 1970s (I was a kid). They were Christian socialists who located their ideas in teh pre-enlightenment period. ...
February 02, 2026 at 20:53
Indeed. :up:
February 02, 2026 at 20:47
Possibly. I think he takes the Gospels as a proto-radical Marxism.
February 02, 2026 at 20:30
I think the argument goes something like this. Care to criticise how it's laid out? Premise 1: Naturalism explains everything in terms of physical cau...
February 02, 2026 at 20:18
Sure, that’s why I think of it as a heuristic, with limitations. And let’s face it: any little maxim that tries to universalise is probably doomed, if...
February 02, 2026 at 20:10
You tell me.
February 02, 2026 at 19:53
No that’s a reductionist account, Hart arrives there via philosophical arguments not dogma. He is a Neoplatonist.
February 02, 2026 at 19:48
Do we know this? Isn’t the question of consciousness still a contested space? But yes on the normativity issue. Nice work. Yes, I think this touches o...
February 02, 2026 at 19:42
This is an entirely different subject. Again, I'm not much interested in how the argument might be used by some, nor in refutations of it. Hart would ...
February 02, 2026 at 19:34
Yes, he identifies as a neoplatonist. Interesting. Although Hart identifies as a socialist, he mocks MAGA and openly disparages evangelicals which he ...
February 02, 2026 at 19:04
Ha! This is exactly what I was saying about this to a friend yesterday. I always paraphrase it as, “If you believe in grammar, you’re a theist.”
February 02, 2026 at 08:55
Nice. I guess one could go onto argue that language already presupposes access to logical form, universals, truth, and intentionality. You can’t build...
February 02, 2026 at 08:50
Thanks. As I said, I’m not trying to debunk the argument. I’m trying to get a better account of it. What you’re doing is reading over my very elementa...
February 02, 2026 at 06:55
I have no expertise in metaphysics or ontology, but my sympathies have led me toward simple-minded anti-foundationalism. Exploring this is for another...
February 02, 2026 at 06:26
Say some more, I’m not sure I follow. But if you’re saying that the GR is culturally located, then that’s probably true. Although I suspect there are ...
February 02, 2026 at 04:46
I think the argument is meant to be something like this: P 1: Naturalism explains everything solely in terms of physical causes, laws of nature, and e...
February 02, 2026 at 04:43
Yes, that seems to be right. My sympathies these days are with the latter. Can you sketch out the argument being suggested that naturalism can't expla...
February 02, 2026 at 04:36
Certainly our experience of the world suggests patterns, but it’s unclear to me how these reflect the universe itself versus how we function as observ...
February 02, 2026 at 02:54
I think that’s the right point. The reality, however, is that ethics is complex, and the Golden Rule is a simplification or, perhaps a heuristic. I do...
February 02, 2026 at 01:44
No need to be sorry, some clever people have put forward this argument over the years. And it shows up on this site every now and then. Some still acc...
February 01, 2026 at 08:41
Yes, that’s the response I have often given to this common objection.
February 01, 2026 at 05:17
Prayer might be seen as living communion with God, while meditation is a reflective or preparatory exercise that may incline one to prayer, yet is not...
February 01, 2026 at 00:03
I’m interested in the same thing. I don’t think it’s correct for you to suggest that because I disagree, I’m interested in a wrong aspect of this disc...
January 31, 2026 at 21:41
That sounds like a kind of argument from authority. The authority in this instance is the insider, whose world the outsider could not possibly underst...
January 31, 2026 at 12:57
Are we anywhere near this yet? If you want household chores properly done, you hire someone to do them or do them yourself. Robot vacuums are pretty s...
January 31, 2026 at 01:01
Yes. One of the most powerful tools of the status quo and certain corporate interests is the idea that all is hopeless, all parties are the same. If p...
January 31, 2026 at 00:48
I think there are many people in religion and politics for whom rigid categories and binary thinking make sense. It’s how they see the world. For them...
January 30, 2026 at 22:21
Of course. But you overstate this. They might take issue with some or several things, not all things. I would have serious concerns with someone who i...
January 30, 2026 at 00:58
That’s obviously your strong opinion. But I don’t think doubt is the same thing as dishonesty or bad faith. Nor do I think it can be shown that certai...
January 29, 2026 at 21:16
I’m essentially with you on this. A lack of doubt is a red flag for me. People without doubt tend toward fundamentalism or zealotry. Certainty, and de...
January 29, 2026 at 20:58
It means: If you treat force as primary, the inner doer dissolves, revealing a grammatical habit mistaken for explanation. Can't you see that?
January 29, 2026 at 03:32
Or they promise limitations and deliver salvation. Depends on your point of view. :wink:
January 28, 2026 at 01:13
The only earphones I’ve ever owned are the little ones that sit inside your ear, like suppositories.
January 26, 2026 at 20:30
Hmm, almost anyone can make that point and then go on to assert virtually anything about a given matter with impunity. There are few things more tedio...
January 21, 2026 at 21:47
I think such matters boil down to intersubjective agreement. This is never unanimous, there are always dissenters, and the mores or systems we have, w...
January 21, 2026 at 05:46
Some might consider them related. :wink:
January 21, 2026 at 02:33
Yes, as I said earlier, the resurrection is subject to as many critical interpretations as Moby Dick. I suppose that suggests the matter isn’t really ...
January 21, 2026 at 00:27
Nicely worded. Thanks. The issue with these sorts of interpretations is that they remind me of differing readings of Moby Dick or any great novel. Wel...
January 20, 2026 at 20:59
Where do we find morality? I know there are laws.
January 20, 2026 at 20:10
Well, I did point out that there were “innumerable” other interpretations so not necessarily. Really? How so? One only has to look as the Christian tr...
January 20, 2026 at 19:19
I think the second quote is an articulation of the first. It would make sense for the religion of one's cultural background to capture something the o...
January 20, 2026 at 04:34
Oh dear... go well, Wayfarer, we'll miss you. :up::up:
January 19, 2026 at 23:23
I think many belief systems cheerfully overcome facts: that’s a function of belief systems, whether religious or not. I think this applies to football...
January 19, 2026 at 21:16
My own answer is to aim for balance and try to be aware of what is happening inside. I also think (and this is also a personal choice) that one's emot...
January 19, 2026 at 20:45
I'm sure he would, it just seemed to be a similar formulation with history standing in for science. I often wonder, in such cases, why Christianity ra...
January 19, 2026 at 20:24
Thank you. I'm not honest so much as limited in scope. Again, that may apply to some forms of atheism, but it is not a sufficiently consistent line of...
January 19, 2026 at 20:19
Forgive my quick response. Sounds like Allison holds to a variation of the Non-Overlapping Magisteria between history and faith. I think there are a l...
January 19, 2026 at 19:51
I’m interested in all religion; always have been. It's an easy subject to engage with given its ubiquity around the planet and it's influence on geopo...
January 19, 2026 at 19:24
Yes, fair point.
January 18, 2026 at 23:53