You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Tom Storm

Comments

Agree. Is there a clear alternative? Isn't it necessarily the case that higher skilled expertise will likely be more useful and better paid than an un...
October 12, 2021 at 21:50
What contribution does this yin/yang variation make to human life?
October 12, 2021 at 21:19
Yes. The very clear rules of what constitutes a darts game. There is even a darts regulation authority. Just because you call them 'special arts' mean...
October 12, 2021 at 19:46
Interesting. Are you someone who thinks art has a responsibility? Does your perspective risk a subjectivist aesthetic? Is all post-modern art free of ...
October 12, 2021 at 19:01
Are you going by an account of aesthetics rooted in modernist theory, or are you just using the terms as you see them apply?
October 12, 2021 at 10:29
Is this epistemic or imaginative? Who can really say they know God? Well, I know they can say it, but it's hardly plausible. A figure of speech. Even ...
October 12, 2021 at 09:49
Based on the fact that philosophers hold different views on the subject. And there is no accepted definition of what consciousness is. But hey, I may ...
October 12, 2021 at 09:45
Coming Through Slaughter Buddy Bolden imagined by Michael Ondaatje
October 12, 2021 at 01:38
As someone who doesn't understand religious language, the only inference I see is that people imagine all kinds of things but it doesn't make those th...
October 12, 2021 at 01:35
I don't follow.
October 12, 2021 at 01:15
Enter idealism discussion.
October 12, 2021 at 00:41
:pray: Thanks.
October 12, 2021 at 00:34
As you say, speculation. I would imagine the more we achieve, the bigger the fantasy life. Nicely contextualized. :up: It's important not to read 'end...
October 11, 2021 at 23:31
That's for sure, several pages of no particular insight into what art is, as opposed to, say, the act of nose picking - which may also hold informatio...
October 11, 2021 at 23:21
Can you expand a little? Aesthetic?
October 11, 2021 at 23:10
If people are basing beliefs on Murdoch owned media or dubious self-appointed YouTubers, they are likely to hold erroneous beliefs.
October 11, 2021 at 21:42
Perhaps, but I'm not an actual philosopher so all I have is language. :razz:
October 11, 2021 at 21:32
The left and the right meet at the extreme back end. I work in the area of health services and directly liaise with government. I don't need to see an...
October 11, 2021 at 21:30
I don't have much of a foundational springboard. How I justify a belief generally depends on the nature of that belief. Most of my beliefs can be test...
October 11, 2021 at 21:05
Yes, that's along the lines I was thinking.
October 11, 2021 at 20:58
I hold a belief that almost any news from tendentious Youtube sites is bullshit.
October 11, 2021 at 20:53
Which is why skepticism is more than just a pretty name...
October 11, 2021 at 20:41
I understand W. I heard this from David Bentley Hart too when he was going after the implacable Dennett. I remain ambivalent.
October 11, 2021 at 20:40
That's wonderful and sounds likes a fitting statement for a grave marker. The only thing atheists have in common is one thing - a lack of belief in Go...
October 11, 2021 at 20:15
Maybe, but there are thousands of tendentious channels and websites run by ideological crackpots. What does it prove?
October 11, 2021 at 20:01
Sorry, I don't understand what you are saying. You seem to be making up a worldview.
October 11, 2021 at 19:58
Packer makes good points.
October 11, 2021 at 19:52
I'm not sure that politics as practiced involves coherent beliefs, more like loose themes and perceptions. The main game is getting elected and appeal...
October 11, 2021 at 19:07
Can you expand - I don't understand the point. I guess you would need to accept this myth or the point doesn't hold. Do you think your OP is intelligi...
October 11, 2021 at 19:04
Isn't it simply the case that politics has become tribal and dumbed down around themes such as freedom versus social control and that tribalism is gal...
October 11, 2021 at 18:57
Yes, but I wonder whether the subject itself is much more than a trick. :razz: But this does seem unlikely.
October 11, 2021 at 18:43
The source of information is important. I personally would be unlikely to accept anything by Nomad Capitalist. :wink:
October 11, 2021 at 18:39
I read this and it still doesn't resonate much. I understand that an objective account by beings who can't transcend their own perceptions is unlikely...
October 11, 2021 at 10:22
Unanswerable. There are good and bad academics and some university departments are subject to fads and agendas. Sometimes work transcends the universi...
October 11, 2021 at 01:33
What strikes me as ironic is this would be the view my uneducated grandmother would hold. It's very commonsensy and relies on a very literal interpret...
October 11, 2021 at 01:23
Of course there is also a centuries long tradition of philosophers, spiritual searchers and mystics taking on on a life of poverty, often turning thei...
October 09, 2021 at 08:43
I think it's more complex. I've met my share of prodigiously talented and wealthy men and women. Most of them were driven, anxious types and sometimes...
October 08, 2021 at 23:47
:up:
October 08, 2021 at 23:24
My issue with this is that people with religious morality often seek to change laws and behaviour of others - presumably to please God. We don't just ...
October 08, 2021 at 22:33
Yes. The other interpretation for 'source of all knowledge' is the recognition that human knowledge is fallible, tentative and piecemeal - it's source...
October 08, 2021 at 01:15
Recently came across this definition by Merleau-Ponty ‘Philosophy is not a particular body of knowledge; it is the vigilance which does not let us for...
October 07, 2021 at 20:13
People may always act in self-interest, but this can also include self-interested alturism. For instance, a healthy cooperative community benefits man...
October 07, 2021 at 19:09
Agree. I'm not a philosopher so if there's a specialist answer, I don't know it. But to say some statements are neither true or false, therefore they ...
October 07, 2021 at 18:52
I was thinking more about renegotiating a shared conversation that may not just be 'your terms' but a greater focus on 'our terms'. If that makes sens...
October 07, 2021 at 00:25
That gave me the biggest laugh I have had in ages, thanks. You sound like a gauche country cousin who has just seen a sculpture by Michelangelo and is...
October 07, 2021 at 00:05
Is it always 'your terms'?
October 07, 2021 at 00:00
Would it mean to identify stories/examples/lessons and commandments in the book which seem morally questionable?
October 06, 2021 at 23:42
Nice work. There's something august and poetic about your definitions of philosophy and science and, perhaps, if you don't mind me saying, a retributi...
October 06, 2021 at 23:28
In: Realism  — view comment
The person who is born is the person who also dies. Does this mean it is true to say that a person is both born and dead? Isn't this how the ship depa...
October 06, 2021 at 21:49
In: Realism  — view comment
Just my thinking through this - I may well be wrong. I thought we were looking for things that were true and false simultaneously. For your idea to be...
October 06, 2021 at 21:24