You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

Consider: https://worldhistoryconnected.press.uillinois.edu/9.2/images/croizer_fig09a.jpg It's not Soviet brutalism; nor the phalic expressions of cap...
July 25, 2021 at 00:25
:wink: That's my area of interest this week.
July 25, 2021 at 00:14
It's clear in my hardcover version, although I did have to use a magnifying glass.
July 25, 2021 at 00:11
I'll take exception to this on Wittgenstein's behalf! Whereof one cannot speak... you would have him apply language games?! No, that would be absurd. ...
July 25, 2021 at 00:03
Possible worlds is a quite different area. It explicitly assumes consistency. This does not. Of course, if this could be made coherent, then it might ...
July 24, 2021 at 23:40
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQetemT1sWc This is, of course, the greatest song of all time.
July 24, 2021 at 23:36
You are off on your usual pattern of commenting without grasping what is going on. What you wrote here is exactly wrong; it is what has explicitly bee...
July 24, 2021 at 23:22
I don't agree. There's something important going on here.
July 24, 2021 at 23:18
High praise, seeing as you would have a better grasp of what it is about than we commoners. I find I had roughly assumed that incoherent and inconsist...
July 24, 2021 at 23:16
Flat Euclidean space can be seen as a special case in which parallel lines stay the same distance from each other. Consistent mathematics is a special...
July 24, 2021 at 23:04
That doesn't strike me as a useful. If you want to make use of a many-valued logic, it is perhaps best to do it explicitly.
July 24, 2021 at 22:38
Stan Grant dabbles in some philosophy, and Beatles: The philosophers who might help us through COVID's dark days of lockdown
July 24, 2021 at 22:27
Unless in can be pointedly inconsistent. Take a look at the articles cited.
July 23, 2021 at 07:19
We can't talk about evil without reference to Hannah Arendt. Evil is not seeing oneself as having a choice; the obedience of Eichmann the mere uncriti...
July 22, 2021 at 02:58
You might say that. I couldn't possibly comment.
July 22, 2021 at 02:01
The states have independent bodies that can investigate public corruption in the civil service and amongst politicians. We need one at Federal level, ...
July 22, 2021 at 01:07
Perhaps in the final analysis "1" doesn't map on to anything; https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/8110/1-does-not-refer-to-anything. "Truth" has...
July 22, 2021 at 00:27
We already deal effectively with distance, so that's wasn't the issue. The Government is broken. The Liberal Party is a mismatch of conservatives and ...
July 21, 2021 at 23:44
Two things there that look problematic. "...the objects which sit on the end of those symbols' interpretations..." It seems to me erroneous to think o...
July 21, 2021 at 23:37
I'm sure we are both being selective as suits us.
July 21, 2021 at 23:24
A dissection of Liberal incompetence: We’re paying companies millions to roll out COVID vaccines. But we’re not getting enough bang for our buck The i...
July 21, 2021 at 23:21
At first blush, the former is a fiction, the latter a contradiction.
July 21, 2021 at 21:49
..looking to retire on the commissions.
July 21, 2021 at 21:43
...that you are overthinking the issue. There isn't a problem here.
July 21, 2021 at 21:42
...or sometimes to strap on an explosive vest and be rid of the infidel. Here's the rub: these metaphysical notions do not have a truth value; but the...
July 21, 2021 at 21:40
Here is another way to be rid of Modus Ponens...
July 21, 2021 at 21:36
Too obscure, it seems, for folk to comment on. At stake is the nature of language, or at least the best way to analysis it. Over a hundred years ago -...
July 21, 2021 at 21:34
Ok, thanks for your work. Glad you found it interesting. I don't agree. Solving crossword puzzles is not time wasted.
July 21, 2021 at 21:04
Cheers.
July 21, 2021 at 02:48
I'd rather a direct citation. IF Russell said it, where? It sounds wrong for him.
July 21, 2021 at 01:15
:rofl:
July 21, 2021 at 00:56
Really? Where?
July 21, 2021 at 00:54
Is "paradigm" a cool word again? It was cool for while in the seventies, and eighties, then went into a steep decline for many years, probably due to ...
July 21, 2021 at 00:53
Historical patriarchy, which your comment reinforced. Submissive would have been a better choice.
July 20, 2021 at 22:25
No, it doesn't. If you meant passive, why not say passive, instead of the implicitly sexist language you chose? Actually, I would have used "submissiv...
July 20, 2021 at 22:14
The quote or the relevance...? :wink:
July 20, 2021 at 22:09
A feminine power monger?
July 20, 2021 at 22:08
Do you think Bin Laden would agree?
July 20, 2021 at 22:06
Oddly sexist.
July 20, 2021 at 21:54
I don't understand the misattribution (I was quoting you), nor the relevance of your comment.
July 20, 2021 at 21:27
There's a compounding of issues in that post that detracts markedly from any benefit that might accrue from writing a reply. To take the measurement e...
July 20, 2021 at 21:25
(...shakes head and walks away)
July 20, 2021 at 04:11
Making a threat of that sort was once an automatic ban. You are on notice.
July 20, 2021 at 03:07
So we really didn't get anywhere.
July 20, 2021 at 03:03
Even you don't take your view seriously:
July 20, 2021 at 01:26
I hope that you can.
July 20, 2021 at 01:22
Incidentally, while Australia is a huge exporter of coal, and doing it's best to warm the world during these cold winter months, we also have a growin...
July 20, 2021 at 01:21
Think I'll repeat my contribution, just to get it out from under the magma obsession. When faced with a complex problem the rational thing to do is to...
July 20, 2021 at 01:19
Really? Hadn't noticed. :roll:
July 20, 2021 at 01:17
Oh, sure. Coincidence. A likely story. :wink: I'm wondering if you are happy with Counterpunch obsessing on your thread - it keeps it on the top of th...
July 20, 2021 at 01:14