You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Sam26

Comments

The belief is made up of two distinct things, the private nature of the mind state, coupled with the public acts. The belief is not private, without t...
December 31, 2017 at 02:38
Yes, a belief as reflected in one's actions, apart from any linguistic response. They exist, as any belief does, as a state-of-mind, but the belief pr...
December 31, 2017 at 02:34
Thanks Banno, I enjoy it too.
December 31, 2017 at 02:24
You're going wrong by isolating this statement apart from my other statements, that point to actions that reflect these beliefs.
December 31, 2017 at 02:23
Whether it's irrelevant depends on many factors. I'm not saying that it's relevant to Wittgenstein's ideas, even though there is overlap. I'm talking ...
December 31, 2017 at 02:22
Banno you are the master when it comes to giving the shortest possible responses to complex questions. roflol
December 31, 2017 at 02:11
Are you saying that Wittgenstein thought that the mind was somehow empty, that nothing is going on in the mind as we express a belief? And yes he did ...
December 31, 2017 at 02:02
Obviously there is language, and as such they are stateable, but this misses my point.
December 31, 2017 at 01:50
Wittgenstein never denied that there was something private going on in the mind, he believed that it was much more though, the actions reflect the bel...
December 31, 2017 at 01:46
I'll respond to this first. What I mean by unstateable is that there is no linguistic forum to state the belief. It's certainly possible that no langu...
December 31, 2017 at 01:38
Even Wittgenstein held to the idea that beliefs can be nonlinguistic, as in my earlier post in which I quoted him. Remember the belief is not dependen...
December 31, 2017 at 01:18
An unstateable belief is nonsense, are you sure about that? Prior to language there were plenty of beliefs that were unstateable. One needs language t...
December 31, 2017 at 01:05
This is not a quibble. It goes to the heart of what I am saying. And I do hold to the definition of knowledge, that it is justified true belief.
December 31, 2017 at 00:59
I do believe, that beliefs acquired by humans and animals are all states-of-mind, and also this is how I intend to make use of the word belief through...
December 31, 2017 at 00:55
"And the concept of knowing is coupled with that of the language-game (OC 560)." This is something important, and it is something that is crucial to u...
December 30, 2017 at 23:43
There is much here to respond to, but I'll only point out some things that I did not say. First, I did not say that animals reason, but of course I'm ...
December 30, 2017 at 23:05
I understand that speech is different from the written works of individuals. My point is that it's important to understand what someone is trying to c...
December 30, 2017 at 17:29
What's special about philosophy for me is the unlimited potential for thought. It's much broader than any one field because it goes beyond any one fie...
December 30, 2017 at 17:19
Wow, I guess we're much further apart than I realized. To me Tillich's thinking is a muddled mess. However, to be fair, I've not studied him in depth,...
December 30, 2017 at 16:19
What about when a speaker is before a large audience? Besides certain written texts are directed at certain people. This is a joke right, this thread ...
December 30, 2017 at 04:46
Both, of course!
December 30, 2017 at 01:00
Timeline, you still exist, amazing.
December 30, 2017 at 00:43
Suppose we applied this idea to our everyday speech. It doesn't matter what you meant, only how I interpret it. This a bit strange to me.
December 30, 2017 at 00:35
By definition, i.e., that they're separate necessarily means they're experiences are not the exactly the same. Even if it were possible to put you in ...
December 30, 2017 at 00:29
I agree with you in terms of the tradition, and that there are many facts that present themselves as part of that tradition, but, and I assume since y...
December 29, 2017 at 23:47
As I read through much of what's said in this thread, I find that one of the problems, if not much of the problem has to do with how knowledge is acqu...
December 29, 2017 at 23:42
The problem for me Wayfarer, as someone who argued for years about the evidence in support of the Judeo-Christian tradition, is that although there is...
December 29, 2017 at 20:38
I agree with the other comments, viz., that the above quoted statement is false. There is nothing that precludes the possibility of an infinite regres...
December 29, 2017 at 19:30
I see what you mean. :-O
December 28, 2017 at 21:47
Ya, you really have to be challenged if you're to progress. There are a few people, a handful, in here that can challenge you, unless your so intellec...
December 28, 2017 at 18:32
Ya, I think philosophy, when it's taught well, is valuable whatever field one chooses.
December 28, 2017 at 17:18
You mean there are really people who think this is not the case? I find that amazing.
December 28, 2017 at 17:16
I'm glad you explained what objective means, otherwise, I may have not understood. Of course objective means mind-independent, and of course anyone ca...
December 26, 2017 at 20:19
I'm not so sure that justice is an essential property of moral acts. Moreover, I would disagree that justice is a matter of convention (conventionalit...
December 26, 2017 at 18:48
Did you read the second paragraph? It explains why it's objective, and gives examples.
December 26, 2017 at 04:06
I explained that in the post.
December 26, 2017 at 03:17
I make an argument about objective morality in this thread starting on p. 2 (https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/2297/if-objective-morality-exis...
December 26, 2017 at 00:30
So if I understand you correctly, there are no objective inherent reasons why murder is always immoral, other than what a society dictates?
December 25, 2017 at 23:10
Yes, I believe it is the backbone of philosophy, but knowledge can be gained apart from using just logic. I say argument is the backbone because one o...
December 25, 2017 at 04:40
I didn't say that was all there was to philosophy, but that it's a very important part of philosophy.
December 25, 2017 at 04:33
It seems to be a core feature of being self-conscious that one is aware or illuminated, so to speak, but that doesn't mean there aren't negative aspec...
December 25, 2017 at 04:31
(Although in practice, and on Forums, what metaphysics usually does is result in interminable and irresolvable debate.) You will always have endless d...
December 24, 2017 at 14:08
But isn't something intrinsically valuable because it's not tied to anything else, like needs or desires. Needs though would be better connected than ...
December 22, 2017 at 22:00
I agree, our desires may align with the intrinsic worth of a thing, but desire is not what gives something value. If that were the case my desire to m...
December 22, 2017 at 21:50
Well, we can desire things that have both intrinsic value and extrinsic value. Much of what we desire has some value whether real or perceived.
December 22, 2017 at 21:38
Pleasure is something that is valued by humans, and there is an objectivity to the pleasure, so others can see it and participate in it. For example, ...
December 22, 2017 at 21:35
Well, the way I see it is as follows: It's not a matter of what I think or believe that makes something intrinsically valuable - if that were the case...
December 22, 2017 at 21:26
Yes, many things that have intrinsic value have extrinsic value also. Paper money has extrinsic value, but very little, if any, intrinsic value.
December 22, 2017 at 21:18
The pleasure you get from wine or other things has intrinsic value. It's your experience regardless of where it come from.
December 22, 2017 at 21:10
Knowledge, love, persons, virtue, are other examples of things that have intrinsic value.
December 22, 2017 at 21:07