You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

jkop

Comments

Unlike the dream the real table has the property of being the object of your experience of a table. For example, its present features in your visual f...
November 30, 2016 at 13:16
But experiences are not objects of observation; it's trivially true that you don't observe whether this has dreamy or veridical features... and from t...
November 30, 2016 at 03:38
That's a bad argument. You shouldn't ask for justification of belief in the existence of an external world under the assumption that the external worl...
November 30, 2016 at 01:38
For example, by verification. That's not a principle of realism. Realists assume that the world exists independently of our beliefs and statements. Yo...
November 29, 2016 at 00:49
For a realist reality exists independently of his/her beliefs or statements about it. The idea that reality would somehow exist in itself adds nothing...
November 28, 2016 at 23:29
What is an example of a realist who would disagree with a rejection of the idea that the world exists in itself? No-one says it needs to denote Kant's...
November 28, 2016 at 23:20
There is no such thing as the world in itself. You don't get to take anti-realist assumptions for granted.
November 27, 2016 at 20:10
There's no good reason at all to believe that the world would be differentiated by someone's mind.
November 27, 2016 at 19:57
November 24, 2016 at 02:03
Yet we don't just invent things to say, out of nowhere, for maintaining them in a linguistic system. We also discover reasons to invent and say them. ...
November 24, 2016 at 01:39
The word 'created' seems wrong, because to create is typically a conscious act of putting things together, or in motion, such as designed objects or m...
November 21, 2016 at 22:36
In: Work  — view comment
In some professions the border between work and free time, or work for money and work for nothing, is fuzzy. In architecture, for instance.
November 21, 2016 at 20:33
I'm not obliged to list anything from nothing, nor explain an absence of necessity. Those who believe that purpose is necessary for a good life, and k...
November 20, 2016 at 15:15
That's not my comment. Why don't you reply to what is written instead of your own rephrased misinterpretations? My claim is directed at the anti-intel...
November 20, 2016 at 12:50
Life can be good exactly because you're free from having something to live for. In fact, having something to live for will likely prevent you from hav...
November 19, 2016 at 13:38
Ideologues on the left typically circumvent the inconvenient truth of an opponent's words by smugly diagnosing it as a function of an assumed ignoranc...
November 19, 2016 at 11:58
People live good lives regardless of whether they live for something or nothing. A good life doesn't suddenly arise from having something to live for....
November 19, 2016 at 10:31
I'm not discussing whether something to live for seems necessary for a good life but whether it is necessary, sufficient, both, or neither. I say neit...
November 19, 2016 at 01:10
For example, some people find their pet worth living or dying for. But living for a pet is neither necessary nor sufficient for a good life. You could...
November 18, 2016 at 20:41
One lives and dies regardless of whether there is something to live for. It is neither sufficient nor necessary for a good life.
November 18, 2016 at 19:32
Is there something in particular you wish to discuss?
November 18, 2016 at 19:21
Looks like they don't use it but mention it.
November 18, 2016 at 19:06
Whence the rhetoric? I asked you two straightforward questions.
November 18, 2016 at 19:00
What's it like to be senselessly undergoing a state of negating something? Please feel free to describe a senseless experience of an immaterial intera...
November 14, 2016 at 21:07
You can also wake up from the bang, or pain, and experience a shock which causes your heart to stop, regardless of the physical damage caused by the b...
November 12, 2016 at 22:14
You can die from experiences as well as knives, which result in physical ailments and death. In the case of a knife it might be loss of blood, in the ...
November 12, 2016 at 18:12
Some people die from the experience of pain, depression, a broken heart, delusion or a reality perceived as unbearable etc..
November 12, 2016 at 09:16
To deflate something merely because of its authority is clearly not philosophical. You're campaigning here against the authority of anything scientifi...
November 12, 2016 at 00:22
Deflating the best explanations because of their authority is adolescent, not philosophical. And reductionism is not assumed in my talk of a biologica...
November 11, 2016 at 23:02
It's not a point of view but an explanstion, your campaign to deflate the authority of the sciences, and the best explanations, seems ideological, or ...
November 11, 2016 at 14:08
Consciousness is obviously a biological phenomenon, caused by the organism as it interacts with the world in various ways: e.g. as perceived, remember...
November 11, 2016 at 07:25
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2xjC2rgRjE
November 09, 2016 at 22:34
Rock stars die, evil clowns become presidents in the US m. . What's new?
November 09, 2016 at 09:27
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WXFfolhHrc&list=RDjAFlBd7SNcE&index=20
November 07, 2016 at 20:02
How some things behave in fields of force :)
November 07, 2016 at 19:55
You don't need a special web-site management program for showing your CV online. If you wrote your CV with a word processor, then save it as an html f...
November 06, 2016 at 18:45
Right, and why talk of one's death in the first place under the assumption that a part of oneself lives on? Reminds me of talk of ghosts assumed to be...
November 06, 2016 at 09:58
By understanding the meaning of 'dead' you can know that once you die you're going to stay dead.
November 06, 2016 at 01:13
What's the assumed problem? Collectives as well as individuals thrive on shared infrastructure, shared built environments, division of knowledge and l...
November 06, 2016 at 01:08
So you find the authority of science offensive. Should we care about that?
November 05, 2016 at 17:19
I also find people like Dennett, Dawkins & Co. somewhat insensitive. But I don't think that their dismissal of religion is a dismissal of spiritual ex...
November 05, 2016 at 14:52
It's easy to name harms, harder to say whether they are actual. Some people find the mere presence or absence of others harmful, or a reality which ex...
November 04, 2016 at 17:34
Your questioning of 'brain' is unwarranted, I write 'biological', recall, and brains are literally biological. You can't get more precise than that. E...
November 04, 2016 at 16:05
Consciousness is a biological phenomenon, it arises from conditions of satisfaction such as a brain and things to be conscious of. So, I would describ...
November 04, 2016 at 02:24
That's a good point. One might add that when you see a woman you see the woman, not a portrait. Unless she's acting in a theatre she represents neithe...
November 03, 2016 at 23:58
During the historical era called The Enlightenment, which led to the industrial and scientific revolutions, more people began to rely on the explanato...
November 03, 2016 at 17:58
:D
November 03, 2016 at 09:15
Libel is a legal term, recall, not a constitution of harm. Courts of law investigate whether a case of alleged libel is unlawful. You don't get to det...
November 03, 2016 at 00:01
Why do you rephrase what is open to read? I've said none of those things. Your argument is clearly unsound, and the above is an informal fallacy (load...
November 02, 2016 at 19:35
Clarity of thought is possible. Some have a talent for thinking or seeing things clearly, seemingly without much effort, while others need a lot of ti...
November 02, 2016 at 01:17