You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

How Many Different Harms Can You Name?

schopenhauer1 November 04, 2016 at 10:23 11800 views 102 comments
So life is pretty harmful and I was wondering how many harms we can come up with as a running list. The stipulations are that the harms have to not repeat, it cannot be so similar as to fall into one of the items already on the list, it cannot be too specific (i.e. stepping in dog shit) because that would make it not a general experience that everyone would necessarily suffer from, but it cannot be so general that it would not be its own category. I'll start us off with a list I had from another thread:

1) Individual people's wills and group's will.. Constant jockeying for power plays on when, what, where, hows, social status, social recognition, approval, respect

2) Impersonal wills... Institutions whose management and bottom-line dictate when, what, where.. ranging from oppressive dictatorships to the grind of organizational bureaucracies in liberal democracies.

3) Cultural necessities.. clean-up, maintain, tidy, consume, hygiene

4) Existential boundaries...boredom/ennui, loneliness, generalized anxiety, guilt

5) Survival boundaries..hunger, health, warmth

6) Being exposed to stressful/annoying/harmful environments and people

7) Accidents, natural disasters, nature's indifference (e.g. bear attacks, hurricanes, storms, earthquakes, etc.).

8) Diseases, illness, disabilities, including mental health issues (neurosis/psychosis/phobias/psychosomaticism/anxiety disorders/personality disorders/mood disorders)..

9) Bad/regretful decisions

10) Unfortunate circumstances

11) After-the-fact justifications that everything is either a learning experience or a tragic-comedy.

12) The good things are never as good as they seem

13) How fleeting happy things are once you experience them

14) How easy it is for novelty to wear off

15) The constant need for more experiences, including austerity experiences that are supposed to minimize excess wants (meditation, barebones living, "slumming it").

16) How easy it is to have negative human interaction, even after positive human interaction

17) Craving and striving for more entertainment and "flow" experiences

18) Instrumentality- the absurd feeling that can be experienced from apprehension of the constant need to put forth energy to pursue goals and actions in waking life. This feeling can make us question the whole human enterprise itself of maintaining mundane repetitive upkeep, maintaining institutions, and pursuing any action that eats up free time simply for the sake of being alive and having no other choice.

19) Any hostile, bitter, stressful, spiteful, resentful, disappointing experiences with interperonal relationships with close friends/family, acquaintances, and strangers

20) The classic (overused) examples of war and famine

21) The grass is always greener syndrome that makes one feel restless and never satisfied

22) The need for some to find solace in subduing natural emotions in philosophies that mitigate emotional responses (i.e. Stoicism) and generally having to retreat to some program of habit-breaking (therapy, positive psychology exercises, visualizations, meditations, retreats, self-help, etc. etc.)

23) Insomnia, anything related to causing insomnia

24) Inconsiderate people

25) The carrot and stick of hope.. anticipation that may lead to disappointment..unsubstantiated Pollyanna predictions that we are tricked into by optimistic bias despite experiences otherwise

26) Addiction

Comments (102)

apokrisis November 04, 2016 at 10:28 #30292
Did you mention pessimism?
schopenhauer1 November 04, 2016 at 10:29 #30293
Reply to apokrisis
No, that would be a conclusion from all this harm. But I did mention inconsiderate people. Also mentioned was any hostile, bitter, stressful, spiteful, resentful, disappointing experiences with interperonal relationships with close friends/family, acquaintances, and strangers
apokrisis November 04, 2016 at 11:05 #30300
Reply to schopenhauer1 So pessimism isn't a harm? But what if being surrounded by it is one of life's great unpleasantnesses?
schopenhauer1 November 04, 2016 at 11:12 #30304
Reply to apokrisis
We are surrounded by harm.
apokrisis November 04, 2016 at 11:45 #30307
Reply to schopenhauer1 So is this particular one now also on your list?
schopenhauer1 November 04, 2016 at 12:33 #30318
Reply to apokrisis
So besides being snarky, what are you getting at? Either list some real harms or move on.
Barry Etheridge November 04, 2016 at 16:33 #30327
Incompetent teachers setting meaningless homework?

No that's not mean to be added to your list. It's a genuine question. I can't see any other reason for this entirely pointless, arbitrary exercise!
wuliheron November 04, 2016 at 16:34 #30328
Bad grammar, wars have been fought over bad grammar.
BC November 04, 2016 at 16:38 #30329
Quoting schopenhauer1
25) The carrot and stick of hope.. anticipation that may lead to disappointment..unsubstantiated Pollyanna predictions that we are tricked into by optimistic bias despite experiences otherwise


25.5 The hangman's noose of despair.. altogether unbalanced Cassandra predictions that we are tricked into by pessimism despite experiences otherwise

27. Philosophical OCD

28. Tedious fixations on negative interpretation

29. Anti-Mame Syndrome: the conclusion that one is starving during a banquet.§

§Auntie Mame - Anti Mame -- get it?
jkop November 04, 2016 at 17:34 #30331
It's easy to name harms, harder to say whether they are actual. Some people find the mere presence or absence of others harmful, or a reality which exists independently of their beliefs or statements.
_db November 04, 2016 at 17:35 #30332
The feeling you get when you start to doubt if you're even suffering, and you start suffering even more (i.e. Tolstoy). Am I myself suffering, or do I simply suffer because I know others are suffering? Am I pessimistic because I myself experience these things, or because I hear about other people experiencing these things?

Human languages, across the board, have significantly more adjectives related to harms than to benefits. The English language, for example, has around three times as many adjectives of harm than of benefit. So it won't be surprising when we can make such a large list of harms. This is due not only because we tend to experience more harm than benefit but also, if not primarily because, we subconsciously focus more on the bad than the good. Bad is, in most cases, psychologically stronger than good - it is an extremely well-founded psychological fact. However I will say that since we experience more bad than good, and yet find ourselves still alive, this means that the human specimen is, all things considered, a rather durable specimen. The sun will rise tomorrow one way or another.

Follow this through to a more speculative destination, and we find ourselves agreeing with Dostoevsky: suffering is the root of consciousness.
apokrisis November 04, 2016 at 20:30 #30348
Quoting schopenhauer1
Either list some real harms or move on.


Laughter, children, orgasms, contentment, reaching the top of the mountain - these are all harms because they are all clever illusions and distractions momentarily interrupting our cultivation of a habit of pessimism, our proper philosophical appreciation that the root of all being is suffering.
_db November 04, 2016 at 20:32 #30349
Reply to apokrisis Correct. Pleasure has a twisted way of tricking us into existential continuation.
apokrisis November 04, 2016 at 21:00 #30352
Quoting darthbarracuda
Pleasure has a twisted way of tricking us into existential continuation.


That makes it the worst harm of all in my book. At least the others are honest harms. Pleasure is positively malicious. And without pleasure, how could we truly suffer?

Damn you to Hell happiness.

Terrapin Station November 04, 2016 at 21:01 #30353
First, how are we defining harm?
_db November 04, 2016 at 21:03 #30355
Reply to Terrapin Station Unpleasant experiences with varying levels of obnoxiousness, I suspect.
Terrapin Station November 04, 2016 at 21:20 #30356
Reply to darthbarracuda

Okay, although that would be pretty broad and I wouldn't say it has any moral connotations (whereas people often seem to have moral connotations in mind).
andrewk November 04, 2016 at 23:10 #30391
It's like a reverso Ian Dury wanted to write a song 'Reasons to be Miserable - Part Three'.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIMNXogXnvE
_db November 04, 2016 at 23:56 #30398
Quoting apokrisis
That makes it the worst harm of all in my book. At least the others are honest harms. Pleasure is positively malicious. And without pleasure, how could we truly suffer?

Damn you to Hell happiness.


Pleasure is only a proxy bad when viewed in a certain way. When seen as a reason to continue, pleasure is a manipulative force. When seen as a something good without manipulative/intoxicative properties, then there's nothing wrong with it. I'm not a masochist.

Actually, I see the ethical issues relating to pleasure as more important than how it feels phenomenologically. Pleasure is partly responsible for a billion(s)-year-old-and-counting systematic process of instrumentality. Sentients value their own pleasure more than the pain of other sentients.
Wosret November 05, 2016 at 00:51 #30402
Quoting apokrisis
Laughter, children, orgasms, contrentment, reaching the top of the mountain


Hopefully not all in one day.

dukkha November 05, 2016 at 00:52 #30403
Hangovers

Having your pets die

Having to follow laws even when you don't want to, under threat of state sponsored violence/oppression

Knowing that you and everyone else is going to die

Nightmares

Living in a society where you're judged by your material wealth

Doing something cringeworthy and then remembering it just before you go to sleep and then you cant sleep because you're cringing so much

Having phobias

Needing to wear clothes even when you don't want to, due to weather, laws, social customs, etc

Having your things break or get ruined

Losing money (eg, playing poker, getting ripped off, dropping coins)

Having to transport yourself places (eg, morning commute, wasting time riding bus or train, can't just teleport to your destination)

Eating bad tasting food
schopenhauer1 November 05, 2016 at 01:01 #30406
Reply to dukkha
That's it! Yes, keep going... Anyone else can join in and continue... My original post asks for more general things, but I think the rules can change to include more specific types of events that cause harm.
_db November 05, 2016 at 01:07 #30410
Reply to schopenhauer1 What's your goal here, Schop?
schopenhauer1 November 05, 2016 at 01:07 #30411
Awkward occasions
Paranoia
Losing face
Villages being wiped out (if you happen to live in the wrong area)
Torture
Inter tribal warfare (if you happen to live in that kind of society)
Gang warfare
Ailments associated with aging
Many experiences that go along with dying
Putrid smells, tastes, and exposure to "gross" stuff in general (sewage, bed bugs, scabies)
Food-borne illnesses
Pressure to have forced occasions of interaction with unpleasant people
Automobile anything (bad drivers, accidents, potholes, etc.)
Primitive tribal societies having their way of life and worldview wiped out to be reintegrated in a Western context (if that sort of thing matters)
Loud noises
_db November 05, 2016 at 01:22 #30415
Reply to schopenhauer1 Like I said before: The feeling you get when you start to doubt if you're even suffering, and you start suffering even more (i.e. Tolstoy). Am I myself suffering, or do I simply suffer because I know others are suffering? Am I pessimistic because I myself experience these things, or because I hear about other people experiencing these things?

Also:

Tinnitus (the tune of pessimism)
Tedium
Wild organism attacks
Sexual failings
Sudden catastrophes
Disfigurement, dismemberment, paralysis, etc
Allergic reactions
Academic failures
Ostracized from the tribe
Political disappointments and failures
Economic catastrophes
The experience of dread once you realize that all of this is possible and even likely
schopenhauer1 November 05, 2016 at 01:27 #30418
Quoting darthbarracuda
Like I said before: The feeling you get when you start to doubt if you're even suffering, and you start suffering even more (i.e. Tolstoy). Am I myself suffering, or do I simply suffer because I know others are suffering? Am I pessimistic because I myself experience these things, or because I hear about other people experiencing these things?


I guess you can suffer from knowing about other people's pain but surely painful experiences can be had by everyone. True, some people have more of them than others, but that just goes to show you earlier my point about harms being unequally distributed.
_db November 05, 2016 at 03:49 #30439
Quoting schopenhauer1
I guess you can suffer from knowing about other people's pain but surely painful experiences can be had by everyone. True, some people have more of them than others, but that just goes to show you earlier my point about harms being unequally distributed.


To be quite honest with you, it is other sentient's suffering that bothers me more than my own, and is the main source for my pessimism. I haven't had it super easy either but my own suffering pales in comparison to what others are going through. And the fact that others, like yourself, are pessimistic is definitely an argument for pessimism in general. Only in an unfortunate world would someone like the pessimist exist and actually be wrong about their pessimism. By its very existence, pessimism validates itself.
Streetlight November 05, 2016 at 04:13 #30441


Mr. Men gotchya covered.
Deleteduserrc November 05, 2016 at 05:08 #30446
- when you zip up too early in the bathroom at work and you get a little dime-sized spot on your crotch and now you can't leave the bathroom because someone will notice the spot but can't stay in the bathroom because someone will notice your absence.

- when you smoke weed in an unfamiliar setting, at a house party, and it suddenly hits you hard - and this song starts playing and you realize there are all these emotions you've always had but had entirely forgotten about - you're really starting to feel these emotions now, vividly - and you start to think 'whoa, wait, have all these other people been experiencing these emotions the whole time, and I haven't?? - and so have I, like, been almost literally living in a different world than them, but *thinking* I was in the same world?? - and they just didn't realize I wasn't in the same world?? - but - like - they can tell right now, can't they - are they looking at me? - have they always been looking at me???"

- when you swipe your debit card too soon, and you do it while the cashier is turned away doing other things, so they don't realize you've already tried to swipe (too soon) so you're standing there waiting for the computer to process and they're standing there waiting for you to swipe, but neither of you realize the other isn't waiting for the same thing , but you still feel this kind of tension, and also the cashier is very cute and that makes everything somehow worse.

- the idea of death - it's so final! but then the idea of eternity - it's so claustrophobic! there's no way out! - so then the respite of the idea of death - but....it's so final! - sooo the respite of the idea of eternity - but there's no way out! and back and forth and back and forth (going to sleep for me every night grades 2-5)

schopenhauer1 November 05, 2016 at 06:12 #30454
Reply to csalisbury
>:O

Somehow you managed to capture the these harms so well that anyone whose experienced them can truly empathize.
BC November 05, 2016 at 06:16 #30455
Not dying quite soon enough can be extremely bad. Like, if the stroke you had while driving had been just a little bit worse, death would have ensued immediately, but because the stroke wasn't quite bad enough, you lived just long enough to experience what it is like to find your delightful self engulfed in flames, and one's skin (then deeper flesh) being charred, and one's lungs filling up with hot, horrible smelling smoke, and yet you still aren't quite dead...

That's fairly bad. Even worse are Islamic terrorists causing sewers to back up and explosively ejecting great quantities of feces into the toilet stalls of America, including the very one you are occupying, drenching you in indescribable, unimaginable slime and filth.
schopenhauer1 November 05, 2016 at 06:18 #30456
Quoting Bitter Crank
Not dying quite soon enough can be extremely bad. Like, if the stroke you had while driving had been just a little bit worse, death would have ensued immediately, but because the stroke wasn't quite bad enough, you lived just long enough to experience what it is like to find your delightful self engulfed in flames, and one's skin (then deeper flesh) being charred, and one's lungs filling up with hot, horrible smelling smoke, and yet you still aren't quite dead...


Points for vivid imagery..

Quoting Bitter Crank
That's fairly bad. Even worse are Islamic terrorists causing sewers to back up and explosively ejecting great quantities of feces into the toilet stalls of America, including the very one you are occupying, drenching you in indescribable, unimaginable slime and filth.


Points for originality.
schopenhauer1 November 05, 2016 at 06:23 #30458
Quoting darthbarracuda
Only in an unfortunate world would someone like the pessimist exist and actually be wrong about their pessimism. By its very existence, pessimism validates itself.


Interesting.. can you explain further? The self-validating pessimist.. Isn't it a bit strong to say though that being wrong on a theory proves the pessimistic point? Or is it rather that being wrong about pessimism is bad because, even if pessimism is wrong, the mere fact that others can feel this way proves that a world exists that has people that feel this way and thus shows the non-idealty of the world to allow people that can feel this way about the world. The pragmatist would just chortle that this is simply the fault of the pessimist, not the universe.
JJJJS November 05, 2016 at 13:43 #30489
Claus Harms (1778–1855), German evangelical minister

Daniel Harms, author of the Encyclopedia Cthulhiana

Daniil Harms (1905–1942), English transcription: Daniil Kharms, Russian writer

Friedrich Harms (1819–1880), German philosopher

Hermann Harms (1870–1942), German botanist

Johann Oswald Harms (1643–1708), German painter, engraver and scenic designer

Monika Harms (born 1946), German Attorney General

Rebecca Harms (born 1956), German politician and filmmaker

Clyde Harms (Born 1931), Founder Aruba Scholarship Foundation

schopenhauer1 November 05, 2016 at 14:29 #30496
Reply to JJJJS
You have provided many unique harms. Good job.
_db November 05, 2016 at 17:32 #30530
Quoting schopenhauer1
Interesting.. can you explain further? The self-validating pessimist.. Isn't it a bit strong to say though that being wrong on a theory proves the pessimistic point? Or is it rather that being wrong about pessimism is bad because, even if pessimism is wrong, the mere fact that others can feel this way proves that a world exists that has people that feel this way and thus shows the non-idealty of the world to allow people that can feel this way about the world. The pragmatist would just chortle that this is simply thefault of the pessimist, not the universe.


Yes, I made a blog post on this a while back (shameless self-promotion). Basically, pessimists argue that harmful illusions exist. And you have Stoicism and Buddhism both arguing that ignorance (or the illusion of knowledge) is the cause of all suffering. But I would put it one step further, and claim that, from a more Heideggerian perspective, we are part of the world, not merely "bystanders". The universe produced us. And thus it is capable of producing such harmful ignorance. And like you said, more pragmatic visions essentially boil down to victim blaming. Even the victims themselves are willing to blame themselves, as a method of maintaining order and stability.
BC November 05, 2016 at 17:46 #30535
Anybody mention "harms way" -- out of which we try to stay"?
schopenhauer1 November 05, 2016 at 21:08 #30568
Quoting darthbarracuda
The universe produced us. And thus it is capable of producing such harmful ignorance. And like you said, more pragmatic visions essentially boil down to victim blaming. Even the victims themselves are willing to blame themselves, as a method of maintaining order and stability.


Indeed. I agree that the way to put a lid on any consternation is to simply say it is the victim's fault. It's a great trick really.
BC November 05, 2016 at 23:18 #30614
According to scientists, there are at least two trillion galaxies. Each galaxy has 1 star around which a life-supporting planet revolves, and on which intelligent life now exists. That makes two trillion planets loaded with intelligent beings who are much more subject to harm than they are benefit. There are, thus, billions of trillions disappointed and annoyed individuals nattering away about the unfairness of life -- RIGHT NOW!
schopenhauer1 November 05, 2016 at 23:22 #30615
Quoting Bitter Crank
According to scientists, there are at least two trillion galaxies. Each galaxy has 1 star around which a life-supporting planet revolves, and on which intelligent life now exists. That makes two trillion planets loaded with intelligent beings who are much more subject to harm than they are benefit. There are, thus, billions of trillions disappointed and annoyed individuals nattering away about the unfairness of life -- RIGHT NOW!


So you are saying that the situation can be that much more? On each of those planets does there also exist Elders and nasayers who blame the aliens for not being able to cope with the harms well enough as a feedback mechanism to ensure self-conscious beings find existence well enough to perpetuate itself? Perhaps they are just at the stage of bacterial slime mold or insect larvae in which case they have a couple hundred million years to go.
OglopTo November 06, 2016 at 10:43 #30700
GUILT, HELPLESSNESS, HATE

- for enjoying modern day comforts knowing that these are built upon the immense suffering of countless generations before us and the continued suffering of marginalized people in some not-so-remote place

- for the very being of your existence means that you have to burden other people at work to ask favors, at your leisure time for other people to entertain you, and eventually when you get disabled for other people to look after you

- for thinking badly of your work that puts food on the table; of your colleagues for burdening you with tedious work then eventually try to convince yourself that somehow it's just part of their job and the system;

- for believing that other people are fellow sufferers but feel completely powerless to comfort them; for having to go to vacation and have to see stories of suffering play at the back of your mind for each stranger that you encounter

- for failing to be a bottomless source of joy to others in this world of selfishness; because you too are human; and when people fault you for your moment of weakness, you doubt whether it was your fault all along

- for not even being strong enough to keep your own troubles and weakness to yourself that you risk showing a crack that may cause worry or fear to people around you

- for feeling hopeless as you watch in the sidelines as you imagine close acquaintance's kids have to suffer and eventually perpetuate the cycle of suffering when they grow old


#badday #badweek
schopenhauer1 November 06, 2016 at 17:25 #30751
Reply to OglopTo

That's a really good list of harms. I like that you bring up the nuance that our pleasure may rely on enormous amounts of pain that are so indirect or removed, we do not usually think about it.

Also you bring up a good point about cognitve dissonance.. We know the work is what provides our survival but we also tend to hate many of the tediousness and unpleasantness associated with it. With the idea of work you also bring up the idea that our needs cause others to have to work as well, thus contributing to the cycle.
OglopTo November 06, 2016 at 17:51 #30753
Reply to schopenhauer1

Thanks. I was really quite "upset" earlier but thankfully, things got a little bit more manageable lately. So if I may add to the list:

- having mood swings and emotional outbursts just like that then recovering after watching some drama series (like what's wrong with me? hahaha...)

- "getting over" then partly regretting what you have done during your outburst; feeling quite worried that you'll inevitably let loose some steam some future time you least expected and you no longer have an idea what harm you could do by then

- realizing that after all that has happened, nobody knew the depths of sadness that you've been through, and nobody else would probably know; life goes on, the world does not seem to care, and by the way, you have to better get ready for work tomorrow as if nothing just happened!

schopenhauer1 November 06, 2016 at 17:54 #30754
Quoting OglopTo
- realizing that after all that has happened, nobody knew the depths of sadness that you've been through, and nobody else would probably know; life goes on, the world does not seem to care, and by the way, you have to better get ready for work tomorrow as if nothing just happened!


This is an interesting point.. It is funny how all this drama in your head can ensue.. this internal emotional suffering.. and how it can be negated simply cause there is no context to even explain the emotional strife.. No one seems to understand, care, empathize, or give a shit. This is why a philosophy of pessimism is a consolation and provides dignity to the individual. At the least, it does not give short shrift of your pain by dismissing it, ridiculing your voicing of it, etc.

I do want to distinguish it from a regular bitch session where you are directing it very personally about a person or group of people.. Rather it is an existential bitch session where the suffering is put into a context of how it fits into the harms of existence. We can see each other as fellow-sufferers and are in the same boat.
dukkha November 06, 2016 at 20:51 #30776
I'm not so sure about the worth of pessimism. Whenever I think about all this stuff, especially how suffering greatly outweighs pleasure, and pleasure itself seems mostly just a reduction or cessation of some pain/suffering experience or another, I feel like I should just kill myself. I mean if life really is how the pessimist describes, why live?

I think you're probably better off not being aware of any of this, like a child, or a cat. Being aware that you suffer is itself a type of suffering.
_db November 06, 2016 at 21:14 #30781
Quoting dukkha
I'm not so sure about the worth of pessimism. Whenever I think about all this stuff, especially how suffering greatly outweighs pleasure, and pleasure itself seems mostly just a reduction or cessation of some pain/suffering experience or another, I feel like I should just kill myself. I mean if life really is how the pessimist describes, why live?


Why indeed? I would argue that life does not give us any reason to continue to live - any reason must come from the individual themselves. This is why Nietzsche said that those who continue to live (not just survive) have a purpose or a sense of meaning.

Quoting dukkha
I think you're probably better off not being aware of any of this, like a child, or a cat. Being aware that you suffer is itself a type of suffering.


Unfortunately, being unaware and ignorant often causes more suffering than not. At the very least it is irresponsible.
schopenhauer1 November 08, 2016 at 00:13 #31043
Bring out your harms! Any good ones today?
_db November 08, 2016 at 00:15 #31044
Wosret November 08, 2016 at 00:55 #31058
There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.
schopenhauer1 November 08, 2016 at 00:56 #31059
Reply to darthbarracuda
But you must explain the harm so we can all be explicitly aware..
_db November 08, 2016 at 01:07 #31061
Reply to schopenhauer1 Disappointment with a collective group of ignorant plebs.
schopenhauer1 November 08, 2016 at 04:29 #31100
Reply to darthbarracuda
Disappointment is a big theme in pessimism. So many instances.
Terrapin Station November 08, 2016 at 12:56 #31181
What they're calling "new atheism" isn't very different than Madalyn Murray O'Hair and her American Atheist organization, which became active in the 1960s, as well as the Freedom From Religion Foundation, which became active in the 1970s. Both camps are/were activist-oriented, extremely anti-religious, they've regularly filed lawsuits against religous infiltration and influence on government/public institutions and activities, etc.

So I don't know how "new" any of the "new atheism" is, unless we're considering the 60s "new," in which case I'm happy to be young again.
schopenhauer1 November 08, 2016 at 13:39 #31189
@darthbarracuda
That the only exit is suicide rather than a pleasant sleep that lasts a long time. That after sleep comes the awake part and all the energy, stress, and exposure to harm that comes with it.
Terrapin Station November 08, 2016 at 13:48 #31191
I'd love to spend a few days hanging out with you, schopenhauer1, to see what your life is like.
Hanover November 08, 2016 at 14:05 #31193
That harm that comes from your dog whining that she wants to be let outside while you sleep but you ignore her so she stops for just a little while so you're able to go back to sleep but she persists every few minutes and you know eventually you'll have to let her out and you just wish you had done it sooner so as to not have her keep waking you back up sort of like an alarm clock that goes on and off periodically and you just wish you'd have yanked it out of the wall instead of just wishing it would go away.

I call this the stress of procrastinating the inevitable and wishing you'd have dealt with it sooner.
schopenhauer1 November 08, 2016 at 14:44 #31197
Quoting Hanover
I call this the stress of procrastinating the inevitable and wishing you'd have dealt with it sooner.


Yes a common harm. But, even if you deal with it early on, there will always be some other alarm going off to take its place.
Hanover November 08, 2016 at 18:35 #31250
Reply to schopenhauer1 My favorite haiku:

After weeks of watching the roof leak
I fixed it tonight
by moving a single board

schopenhauer1 November 09, 2016 at 02:24 #31308
Quoting Hanover
After weeks of watching the roof leak
I fixed it tonight
by moving a single board


“Certain it is that work, worry, labor and trouble, form the lot of almost all men their whole life long. But if all wishes were fulfilled as soon as they arose, how would men occupy their lives? what would they do with their time? If the world were a paradise of luxury and ease, a land flowing with milk and honey, where every Jack obtained his Jill at once and without any difficulty, men would either die of boredom or hang themselves; or there would be wars, massacres, and murders; so that in the end mankind would inflict more suffering on itself than it has now to accept at the hands of Nature. In”
-Arthur Schopenhauer
BC November 09, 2016 at 05:04 #31333
US 2016 Election outcome
_db November 09, 2016 at 05:35 #31346
Reply to schopenhauer1 The state in which I live just legalized assisted suicide. This makes it legal to die if one is terminally ill with six months left to live.

If this was extended to those who are depressed or who just don't want to live anymore, would you take it?

For me at least, as much as I generally find life annoying and painful, I nevertheless have a strong instinct to survive, to create, to do. I don't want to die. Suicide fantasy has been a recurrent theme in my thought but whenever I actually seriously consider dying, there is something that keeps me back. Something beyond just primal instinct, I think.

Perhaps life is bad but not bad enough to warrant suicide, not enough to get a eliminate the capacity to derive a decent amount of enjoyment out of it. We may not gain anything in life but it sure as hell is difficult to act as if this is the case. At least by surviving we maximize irony.

Thoughts?
schopenhauer1 November 09, 2016 at 06:35 #31358
Reply to darthbarracuda

The will to survive.
1) People usually are attached to their individual egos once alive.
2) It is more of an escape hatch ideation
3) Philosophical Pessimism can be a philosophy of consolation
schopenhauer1 November 10, 2016 at 00:08 #31642
@Bitter Crank

The harm of your organization or country being run by an incompetent or wrong-headed leader.
schopenhauer1 November 10, 2016 at 02:07 #31660
Bring out your harms!

User image
BC November 10, 2016 at 03:58 #31680
_db November 10, 2016 at 04:24 #31686
Please delete
schopenhauer1 November 10, 2016 at 12:50 #31786
Reply to Bitter Crank
That's a lot of bells, bells, bells!
schopenhauer1 November 10, 2016 at 12:57 #31789
Have any fresh harms @OglopTo? You had some good ones...
@csalisbury?
@Hanover?
@darthbarracuda?
@dukkha?
@Bitter Crank?
Terrapin Station November 10, 2016 at 14:13 #31811
Reply to schopenhauer1

How about the harm of spoiled-brat/coddled/fragile millennials who don't reason very well, who are kind of paranoid, and who have a victim mentality not being able to handle that they didn't get their way, so they throw a tantrum (er, uh "protest")?
schopenhauer1 November 10, 2016 at 14:18 #31814
Quoting Terrapin Station
How about the harm of spoiled-brat/coddled/fragile millennials who don't reason very well, who are kind of paranoid, and who have a victim mentality not being able to handle that they didn't get their way, so they throw a tantrum (er, uh "protest")?


So the harm of an internet troll?
Terrapin Station November 10, 2016 at 14:21 #31816
Reply to schopenhauer1

A lot of them are trolls, I suppose.
schopenhauer1 November 10, 2016 at 14:23 #31817
Quoting Terrapin Station
A lot of them are trolls, I suppose.


Do you always mix up your pronouns? Maybe that is what Pink Floyd meant by "Us and Them".
Terrapin Station November 10, 2016 at 14:30 #31821
Reply to schopenhauer1

There was no "mix up" there.
schopenhauer1 November 10, 2016 at 14:32 #31823
Quoting Terrapin Station
There was no "mix up" there.


So you are trying to make an actual philosophical point or a dig at the OP? But by doing this, I ironically just get sucked into your troll hole, so I'm sort of harming myself here.. but go on and prattle your invective :-}
Terrapin Station November 10, 2016 at 14:34 #31824
Reply to schopenhauer1

I don't really see this thread as one that makes any sort of philosophical point. (And I dont think there's anything wrong with that, by the way--it's fine that we have a thread that doesn't make a philosophical point, but that's related in some way to philosophical views that people do have.)

You were asking people to list "harms." I was listing one in my opinion. Part of the point of me doing so is to stress that different people have different opinions of what counts as harms.
schopenhauer1 November 10, 2016 at 14:42 #31829
Quoting Terrapin Station
You were asking people to list "harms." I was listing one in my opinion. Part of the point of me doing so is to stress that different people have different opinions of what counts as harms.


See couldn't you have said that from the beginning instead of wrapping it in troll-speak? That's a much better place to start to have a discussion or debate.
Terrapin Station November 10, 2016 at 14:43 #31830
Reply to schopenhauer1

I expect this in general, but particularly on a philosophy message board, I expect people to be able to think for themselves a bit, to be able to make deductions and inferences and abductions and so on.
schopenhauer1 November 10, 2016 at 15:14 #31839
Quoting Terrapin Station
I expect this in general, but particularly on a philosophy message board, I expect people to be able to think for themselves a bit, to be able to make deductions and inferences and abductions and so on.


No I knew what you meant from your original posting..but my point was did you have to come out swinging? I guess I may have misinterpreted this.. The whole possible misunderstanding is, did you aim that quote directly towards me or were you trying to vent about something in general?

But more generally, even if that was not meant to be aimed at me, just realize that to me, trolling can mean that you are trying to provoke a street brawl rather than keep it at a more respectful fencing match (though I don't know much about fencing it seems more coordinated and structured).. If you what you say clearly going to provoke the other guy to want to punch your (metaphorical) face, how is that adding to the philosophical discourse? The immediate emotional response attached to the inciting comment seems to be out of inciting emotional shouting matches rather than advancing any particular idea.
Terrapin Station November 10, 2016 at 15:16 #31840
Reply to schopenhauer1

No, it wasn't at all aimed at you. It was basically a response to "The harm of your organization or country being run by an incompetent or wrong-headed leader. "

That's one point of view. Mine is another.
schopenhauer1 November 10, 2016 at 15:18 #31841
Quoting Terrapin Station
That's one point of view. Mine is another.


OHH.. Ok, now I clearly see where you were going.. It was still meant to be inciting.. but I see the context. Why didn't you just quote the comment so it was not seen as a general rant but aimed at a particular previous comment?

Edit: I see you did that but you didn't quote it.. Ok.. now I see where you are going.
Terrapin Station November 10, 2016 at 15:21 #31843
Reply to schopenhauer1

It wasn't meant to be inciting either. That's my honest opinion of the majority of the folks protesting in the last 24 hours. I can see how it would upset some of them, of course, but I'm not going to coddle them more--since that's a large part of their problem--by changing the language of my opinion just because it might upset some of them. They're not changing how they're expressing themselves just because that might upset some people with different viewpoints than the one's they're expressing (and they shouldn't in my opinion).
OglopTo November 10, 2016 at 15:26 #31845
Reply to schopenhauer1

Nothing much that I seriously considered recently.

Usually, I think of the tediousness of daily life and seeming insignificance and meaninglessness of it all especially when I'm overwhelmed with so much urgent things-to-do, usually work related.
schopenhauer1 November 10, 2016 at 15:45 #31849
Quoting OglopTo
Usually, I think of the tediousness of daily life and seeming insignificance and meaninglessness of it all especially when I'm overwhelmed with so much urgent things-to-do, usually work related.


Some people say work gives life meaning because it provides a direction and "something" for them to put their attention on.

The thinking might go that assuming that eventually all forms of entertainment will get exhausted if that is all they do, people will actually "miss" forced routine of this and that task because it keeps their own mind from wandering about the ennui of existence itself. It gives structure because it allows the brain to be "caught up"... and what does a creature with excess consciousness do but get "caught up" so that it cannot think about its own situation of instrumentality, angst, etc.

Meanwhile of course, the getting "caught up" causes stress, anxieties, and its own spin off harms. Perhaps these spin off harms might be weighed against the harm of being left to our own existential contemplation? Thus, people's attitude towards work is that it gives them "meaning" while causing in some cases immense stress.
OglopTo November 10, 2016 at 17:30 #31869
Reply to schopenhauer1

I actually previously entertained the thought that the 'higher ups' knew what they were doing when they designed the 8-hour + travel + lunch time work day, 5-day work week: it provided the right amount of distraction for essentially all of your waking hour, with enough stress and anxiety leftover that you wouldn't have enough remaining energy to use your brain for about anything else but leisure during the weekends and holidays.

People could be much more dangerous if allowed to be idle for long periods of time.
BC November 11, 2016 at 00:39 #31930
Reply to schopenhauer1

being nagged for lists of harms

Next time let's all do 5 syllables
antinatalist haikus, 7 syllables
schopenhauer 2. 5 syllables

Internet troll holes
Hell's bells calling home sick souls
antinatalists

Fucking Autumn leaves!
Brown red yellow sickly beige:
Burn baby, burn them all.

Die my darling, croak.
get it over with! Don't hope.
Deep in earth, dead bloke.

Dove to earth then splat
Meow come the kitty cats
for kidneys and brains.
BC November 11, 2016 at 00:58 #31932
Was not, is not, he.
Absent from eternity.
Dead infinity.
schopenhauer1 November 11, 2016 at 01:36 #31937
Reply to Bitter Crank
Those are very good haikus!
See, you have good thoughts to share
Let me think about it.
_db November 11, 2016 at 07:34 #32076
I always feel bad when I argue for pessimism, unless I have an desire to change people's actions for what I perceive to be the better (ethics). Like, unless something productive is going to come from me presenting pessimism, I don't really feel comfortable intentionally trying to break people's spells of optimism. Unless there is something wrong with living a life unaware or uncaring of the pessimistic point, then arguing for pessimism only increases the total amount of suffering in the world. It's less about doing something productive and more about expressing oneself through pessimism, to the annoyance of others.

The thing about pessimism is that it is probably one of the easiest philosophies to argue for, yet one of the hardest philosophies to accept.
schopenhauer1 November 11, 2016 at 08:22 #32082
Quoting OglopTo
I actually previously entertained the thought that the 'higher ups' knew what they were doing when they designed the 8-hour + travel + lunch time work day, 5-day work week: it provided the right amount of distraction for essentially all of your waking hour, with enough stress and anxiety leftover that you wouldn't have enough remaining energy to use your brain for about anything else but leisure during the weekends and holidays.

People could be much more dangerous if allowed to be idle for long periods of time.


I think people might ask, "Well, what would people do in perpetual idleness?". And there is the existential dilemma many people do not want to face. People want a structure to their life perhaps to keep themselves from mulling over larger questions?
schopenhauer1 November 11, 2016 at 08:40 #32085
Quoting darthbarracuda
It's less about doing something productive and more about expressing oneself through pessimism, to the annoyance of others.


I see, so I should just shut up you are saying. Don't take it so seriously darthy! It partially meant to let people vent if they want..like a shoutbox but for shit we don't like.

I think pessimism can be productive as a philosophy of consolation. It can be a possible alternative to "pick yourself up by the bootstrap" theories. The inherent worth of the individual's suffering is taken into account rather than self-regulating phrases to ensure people do not get too upset by circumstances (by as you said before) "blaming the victim". Anyways, everyone has harms.. some similar, some more nuanced and individual.. It is quite alright to air those to others and find some solace in it.

Besides being a consolation, it may provide perspective on existence itself. Rather than take it as "this is what must be", it provides the individual a way to look at existence as a whole. By questioning the foundations of the human enterprise itself, it lets us look at what is important and what is justified. It allows us to look at how our own psychological mechanisms work to create the structure needed for goals, how it is contingent harms play a role, and confronts the situatedness of being thrown in a world where we are experiencing the pendulum between survival through cultural upkeep and maintenance, and turning boredom into entertainment goal-seeking. All this structural/necessary harm in the background while being harmed by contingent factors along the way.. All the things listed here for example.

Believe it or not, there can be a giddyness to pessimism.. To knowing we are all in the same boat, that it is all part of a similar structure. I dare say, there may be a joy and connectedness in pessimism.

Quoting darthbarracuda
The thing about pessimism is that it is probably one of the easiest philosophies to argue for, yet one of the hardest philosophies to accept.


You'd have to explain that. It sounds like you have many things to say in regards to arguing for pessimism but no one to hear it.. You always have me, dark solitary biting fish. Just don't bite me too much, as is your nature or I'll tear you up like a hapless salmon that is eaten by the grizzly in the picture :).



_db November 11, 2016 at 16:38 #32162
Quoting schopenhauer1
Besides being a consolation, it may provide perspective on existence itself.


I mean, yes, I agree that the pessimistic perspective is helpful in toning down expectations and desires. That's fine.

Quoting schopenhauer1
Believe it or not, there can be a giddyness to pessimism.. To knowing we are all in the same boat, that it is all part of a similar structure. I dare say, there may be a joy and connectedness in pessimism.


This is have an issue with. There is no giddyness to torture, horror, or anguish. It's comedic to see how absurd everything seems to be, so long as you aren't being impacted too much by the absurdity of it all. Why should I be giddy that countless animals are currently being ripped to shreds by predators? Why should I be giddy that life is disappointing and painful? This kind of giddyness ends up being not too dissimilar to the crazy guy in the movies who starts out laughing and ends up crying.

Quoting schopenhauer1
You'd have to explain that. It sounds like you have many things to say in regards to arguing for pessimism but no one to hear it.. You always have me, dark solitary biting fish. Just don't bite me too much, as is your nature or I'll tear you up like a hapless salmon that is eaten by the grizzly in the picture


Well, I mean to say that pessimism is pretty obvious. It is based in empiricism, specifically phenomenological immediate perceptions of existence. It's not easy to argue against it. Some people might say that this is simply because it's easy to complain and bitch and moan. Or maybe it's because it's an accurate picture of reality, and a tough pill to swallow. What is worse is when pessimists try to act upon their belief, they're seen as the baddies, destroyers. When really if something really is this bad then it ought to be destroyed. Permanently.
schopenhauer1 November 12, 2016 at 13:38 #32356
Quoting darthbarracuda
This is have an issue with. There is no giddyness to torture, horror, or anguish. It's comedic to see how absurd everything seems to be, so long as you aren't being impacted too much by the absurdity of it all. Why should I be giddy that countless animals are currently being ripped to shreds by predators? Why should I be giddy that life is disappointing and painful? This kind of giddyness ends up being not too dissimilar to the crazy guy in the movies who starts out laughing and ends up crying.


No I'm with you about actual suffering. What I meant I guess is that if you read a good pessimist writer's turn of phrase (i.e. Schopenhauer's aphorisms), you can get giddy with how well the author articulated the point.

Quoting darthbarracuda
Well, I mean to say that pessimism is pretty obvious. It is based in empiricism, specifically phenomenological immediate perceptions of existence. It's not easy to argue against it. Some people might say that this is simply because it's easy to complain and bitch and moan. Or maybe it's because it's an accurate picture of reality, and a tough pill to swallow. What is worse is when pessimists try to act upon their belief, they're seen as the baddies, destroyers. When really if something really is this bad then it ought to be destroyed. Permanently.


Indeed, I am interested in two ideas that you might want to present...

One is the victim blaming phenomena. Do you think it is a strategy for regulating societal expectations? In other words, is it to prevent people from voicing despair and bringing others into despair mode? Is it like a meme that worked well in maintaining the status quo, so remained as part of the social discourse when someone evaluating the negative voices an opinion?

How much do the psychological ideas of flow and hope play into the counter to pessimism? If you think about it, people simply want to get caught up in something that makes time go faster. At the same time they hope for a situation that might be more positive than the current one and possibly plan accordingly. Does flow and hope justify life affirmation? Flow can prevent the mind from thinking of all these larger angsty existential questions.. Hope can cause someone to take a plan of action to get to a more desired situation.
_db November 12, 2016 at 19:34 #32409
Quoting schopenhauer1
One is the victim blaming phenomena. Do you think it is a strategy for regulating societal expectations? In other words, is it to prevent people from voicing despair and bringing others into despair mode? Is it like a meme that worked well in maintaining the status quo, so remained as part of the social discourse when someone evaluating the negative voices an opinion?


Yes. I mean we still see this with rape victims. "You shouldn't have been out at night!"-like bullshit.

Quoting schopenhauer1
Does flow and hope justify life affirmation? Flow can prevent the mind from thinking of all these larger angsty existential questions.. Hope can cause someone to take a plan of action to get to a more desired situation.


Flow and in particular faith can justify the continuation of a life even if they are not founded well.
schopenhauer1 November 12, 2016 at 20:14 #32411
Deleted
schopenhauer1 November 13, 2016 at 17:02 #32659
Quoting darthbarracuda
Yes. I mean we still see this with rape victims. "You shouldn't have been out at night!"-like bullshit.


So what would be equivalent to "You shouldn't have been out at night!" in this situation?

Quoting darthbarracuda
Flow and in particular faith can justify the continuation of a life even if they are not founded well.


So is flow and faith a good thing or is it more of a stop-gap from addressing bigger existential questions?
_db November 13, 2016 at 18:03 #32664
Quoting schopenhauer1
So what would be equivalent to "You shouldn't have been out at night!" in this situation?


"Why don't you just kill yourself?!" or "Stop being a lazy fuck!"

Quoting schopenhauer1
So is flow and faith a good thing or is it more of a stop-gap from addressing bigger existential questions?


I guess it depends on what ones' priorities are. If you're going for authenticity then no, the probably aren't. If you're just trying to survive, then yeah they're probably going to be helpful.
BC November 13, 2016 at 18:19 #32666
Quoting schopenhauer1
So what would be equivalent to "You shouldn't have been out at night!" in this situation?


"My poor dear deflowered little daisy! Pickled lambs like you are likely to be eaten alive if you hang around bars until the wolves are all drunk. So sorry."
schopenhauer1 November 13, 2016 at 19:52 #32681
Quoting darthbarracuda
"Why don't you just kill yourself?!" or "Stop being a lazy fuck!"


Indeed along with this is the need to compare our situation with Africa. It's as if Africa exists solely so Westernized countries can have something to compare their pain to. See, until all the aide, Peace Corp., microloans, World Bank loans, missionaries, charities, and any other non-profit/government/private forms of help works out over there, we really cannot have any suffering over here. Didn't you know? I use Africa as a stand-in for any underdeveloped region, but you get the picture.

Of course if I had my way and can use a magic wand, Africa would be on par with Europe, America, Japan, or at least China and thus double their efforts in questioning the existential conditions. That's not to say, your average "impoverished" villager in sub-Saharan Africa cannot bring up these issues on his own, but if carrying buckets of water from location a to location b and hundreds of other tasks of daily living take up most of your time, it's probably hard to contemplate much more than getting through the day I would suspect. Of course, even during mundane or strenuous tasks, one's mind can wander and perhaps have these thoughts. Maybe they are not voiced but they are roughly the same kind of existential questioning that occurs in Westernized and "developed" regions. Impoverishment does not negate existential thinking, and perhaps it can amplify it. That would of course be a matter of empirical data gathering to those in that part of the world and as far as I know, most social scientists do not ask people about existential questions in underdeveloped parts of the world, and make it more about broad social categories like economics, religion, politics, etc. I would like some anecdotal evidence of an impoverished tribe discussing the point of their life and the ennui they felt at the end of the day.
_db November 13, 2016 at 23:16 #32696
Reply to schopenhauer1 Of course, the command to us to go kill ourselves may be becoming more and more realistic, considering assisted suicide has been legalized in many states, as well as in other countries like Switzerland. Or perhaps we all just get together and intentionally get stoned as to attempt to remove the instinctual barriers keeping us alive.

This is about where I realize that, despite the shittiness of life in general, I have a distinct urge to continue to live, for whatever reason that is. I don't want to miss out on the happenings of the world, at least not right now. Game of Thrones hasn't ended yet.

So the real twist in the stomach is when you simultaneously see very little in life as a justification for the beginning of a life, but somehow see these things as a justification for continuing a life. And you realize that yeah, all these things are pretty much just distractions, and that if you're gonna hold that it's not enough to make a life worth starting then it really ought to not be enough to continue a life. Suddenly it becomes more difficult to truly enjoy things; instead one has to take a mindfulness approach to experience, and/or submerge oneself in the absurdity of it all and find a sort of aesthetic to the rogue, absurd, wandering survivor, an internal contradiction that can only be expressed in catharsis.

Tolstoy hit the nail on the head: there are four different ways out of our position: ignorance (in which you don't even know our position), epicureanism (hedonism, most people do this), the rejection of the former two but the continuation out of weakness (i.e. existentialism) and the rejection of all three and the embracing of suicide (i.e. the strong). It is the strong who kill themselves, and the weak who persist for no apparent reason whatsoever.
Terrapin Station November 14, 2016 at 13:37 #32773
This is certainly an aside, but just fyi, Africa is actually as complexly varied as the rest of the world. We're talking about 54 different countries, and most of those countries are complexly varied, too, with the complete range of economic, technological, ideological, etc. options.
schopenhauer1 November 14, 2016 at 14:08 #32776
Quoting Terrapin Station
This is certainly an aside, but just fyi, Africa is actually as complexly varied as the rest of the world. We're talking about 54 different countries, and most of those countries are complexly varied, too, with the complete range of economic, technological, ideological,


This is obvious Terrapin, but that was not the point. It's not about Africa's complex varied range of economic, political, socisl phenomena, but the idea of poverty in Africa as a way to try to diminish the relative suffering of "complainer" in the first world. It's a strategy to keep the malcontent at bay and regulated. It's simply a meme that is used against those with negative experiences..similar to other memes of this variety that tries to stop the malcontent in their tracks by comparing to "worse off" situations.

Terrapin Station November 14, 2016 at 14:18 #32777
Reply to schopenhauer1

I hadn't been following the conversation for a number of posts. I just saw the comment about Africa. Yeah, the "these folks are worse off than you" thing is kind of silly, and it's also not something I even agree with on any hypothetical level, as I've expressed before. Happiness isn't dependent on one's socio-economic etc. statuses.