You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

S

Comments

No, why would there be? I suppose that you could say that there's a conflict more broadly, in that a consequence of the variation of feelings means th...
September 03, 2019 at 19:22
If we have rights in an ethical and subjective sense, then why wouldn't it be true or the case that we have rights (in accordance with the aforementio...
September 03, 2019 at 18:59
Why? Because people disagree? People disagree regardless, and always will. No, it's neither of those things. It's not the former because that's simply...
September 03, 2019 at 18:50
It's not that simple, and it's not as absurd as it sounds. I'm not so much saying that they're not real, as that they're not objective. They're as rea...
September 03, 2019 at 18:27
I agree, but then there doesn't need to be. It doesn't have to be universal. There are enough of us where I'm from for it to be the norm. What do you ...
September 03, 2019 at 18:22
No, you're a loony, out there, outspoken, fringe view kind of guy.
September 03, 2019 at 18:04
Right. The typical anti-natalist stuff always involves responses where people explain why they think that people are entitled to have children, wherea...
September 03, 2019 at 18:01
They didn't so much live under the sea, as float lifelessly around, decaying over time.
September 03, 2019 at 17:56
Yes. You attacked a much simpler and weaker stance which you came up with yourself: What you're quoting out of context is a logical consequence of wha...
September 03, 2019 at 17:44
I approve of the discussion merger.
September 03, 2019 at 17:34
It definitely isn't, because those whose arguable justification depends on the existence of a Creator have the infinitely harder task of first establi...
September 03, 2019 at 17:28
We're entitled to have children by default, in accordance with liberalism, and we only lose that entitlement if there's a valid reason for it, which w...
September 03, 2019 at 17:15
What of it? I'm not a realist on rights, and I'm the one who made the claim. There's no contradiction there because obviously as an ethical anti-reali...
September 03, 2019 at 17:07
On the contrary, it's because I'm interested in actual philosophy that I'm so critical of lines of inquiry which are a waste of time because we alread...
September 03, 2019 at 16:51
You made a point about a circular definition without addressing my criticism that you know the answer to your question without my assistance, and that...
September 03, 2019 at 16:35
You're deliberately picking examples which are more likely to skew the outcome in your favour, just like Terrapin Station has done a couple of times n...
September 03, 2019 at 16:23
Okay, so... what? You expect me to believe that you haven't a clue what a right is, what it entails, and that you can't think up any examples, despite...
September 03, 2019 at 16:13
I understand that this is a philosophy forum. I joined it years before you did. And of course I understand what entitlement is. Why should I care abou...
September 03, 2019 at 15:57
Hardly. And I only felt it necessary to clarify in greater detail because you were evidently so confused over my initial more brief and straightforwar...
September 03, 2019 at 15:48
In: Brexit  — view comment
Yeah. Also, nationalising the railways, for example, is known through polling to be highly popular with the general public.
September 03, 2019 at 14:47
In: Brexit  — view comment
I agree, just don't let my party know about my agreement. I'll be voting for Labour, of course.
September 03, 2019 at 14:41
In: Brexit  — view comment
The same Jeremy Corbyn who won a larger share of the vote than Tony Blair in 2005?
September 03, 2019 at 14:40
In: Brexit  — view comment
You can't risk basing your decision on the notion of safe seats. What were thought to be safe seats were taken by both of the main parties in the last...
September 03, 2019 at 14:31
It'll be fine. We have paper straws now.
September 03, 2019 at 14:08
I reckon it's under one of her armpits.
September 03, 2019 at 14:07
Too many syllables. I reckon that would come out like, "Brashvurrrghsh".
September 03, 2019 at 13:56
Username. Maybe that can be today's word of the day.
September 03, 2019 at 13:54
It's not a perpetual roller coaster, it's a perpetual roller coaster ride if you never reach a point where it isn't worth continuing. Personally, I'd ...
September 03, 2019 at 13:39
My doorstop just bit me.
September 03, 2019 at 12:50
Is that someone trying to order a ham sandwich whilst suffering a stroke?
September 03, 2019 at 12:44
Number of letters in my first name: 6. Number of letters in my middle name: 6. Number of letters in my last name: 6.
September 03, 2019 at 12:39
Okie dokie.
September 03, 2019 at 12:35
Just buy yourself a scuba diving kit. You'll be fine. You can live "unda da seeeee", like in that film. You'll be surrounded by beautiful mermaids.
September 03, 2019 at 12:32
Already on it. Apparently it's owned by a Mr. Porat, though he's selling it for £100,000.
September 03, 2019 at 12:15
No, it's basic reasoning of a form we all make all of the time: that's worth doing, so let's do it. Not that it matters, but it's easy to think of cou...
September 03, 2019 at 11:37
The Worthless Pseudo-Intellectual Nerousis Waste Of Time Trivial Folly Inconclusive Incoherent Play Dumb Charade Pathetic Morons I Hate You All Die Mo...
September 03, 2019 at 11:31
You know what a right is without requiring me to define it, and you're capable of thinking of examples.
September 03, 2019 at 07:59
Your request for me to effectively spoon feed you actually offends me.
September 03, 2019 at 07:47
Of course it does. What an absurd denial. Yes, there's a distinction, and obviously the reasoning is that because life is an experience worth living t...
September 03, 2019 at 07:43
Yeah we can. Look around you. You'll see a world full of people. People have been sure enough to make that decision for hundreds of years. Your object...
September 03, 2019 at 07:29
Exactly. I completely agree. That's what I mean about how shortsighted what he said is. It's like he either hasn't thought it through properly, or wor...
September 02, 2019 at 19:03
This is astoundingly shortsighted when you think about it. I was a child once. You were a child once. We all were a child once. We've all hurt and bee...
September 02, 2019 at 18:44
I deliberately ignored that because it should be blindingly obvious what I was referring to. How many times have I referred you to the remarks deliver...
September 02, 2019 at 18:34
Entitlement is part of ethics. It means having a right. You don't seem to understand what entitlement is. It isn't the same as freedom. Your question ...
September 02, 2019 at 18:18
Do you not understand what entitlement means? And regarding what you say about people not wanting their child to hurt anyone or get hurt, that's fine....
September 02, 2019 at 18:09
Did you not read the remarks delivered by the judge in Choudary’s sentencing? Did you not read about the cases linked to Choudary's hate speech? The j...
September 02, 2019 at 17:57
Try not to lose track. It shouldn't be that difficult to follow the logic. We were talking about the media publishing a censored hate speech, as oppos...
September 02, 2019 at 17:45
No, I'm not suggesting that it's true because lots of people believe it, I'm suggesting that it's none of your business to presume that you know bette...
September 02, 2019 at 17:29
Surely you've heard this before. All the people who think that life is worth living.
September 02, 2019 at 17:23
No argument can support such a conclusion. There's no such thing as an immaterial soul, except in religious fiction.
September 02, 2019 at 17:18