You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

S

Comments

Of course it matters. You don't think that it matters whether or not you're making any sense, or whether you're committing a fallacious category error...
September 04, 2019 at 10:41
:rofl:
September 04, 2019 at 10:28
That's more like it. But there's a noticeable problem with your very first premise, and this is a problem that has been raised countless times before,...
September 04, 2019 at 10:25
If it's Professor Brian Cox, I'm not going to be happy. And yet we can still spot a lie. Miraculous!
September 04, 2019 at 10:16
In: Brexit  — view comment
:gasp:
September 04, 2019 at 10:05
In: Brexit  — view comment
Let's say that there's a problem with immigration. Okay, but what annoys me is that this is given priority over economic prosperity. These people comp...
September 04, 2019 at 10:03
The God claims are laughable tosh. But I don't get why the justification which I presented isn't good enough for you. It is good enough for plenty of ...
September 04, 2019 at 09:57
Well, in spite of all of your lengthy replies and insinuations, and in spite of my "huffing", the bottom line is that no physics class in any formal e...
September 04, 2019 at 09:41
Ah, I think I see what you're getting at. So we've resorted back to insinuations of Scientism, and that I don't know enough about physics to have any ...
September 04, 2019 at 02:58
Indeed. You just can't resist responding to my little pearls of aggression on occasion. But in all seriousness, that was mostly good advice. Except fo...
September 04, 2019 at 02:41
It just sounds a tad revisionist to me. Anyway, so Schopenhauer's great contribution was to take the findings of Newtonian physics, and give it a diff...
September 04, 2019 at 02:21
But for good reason, given that "will" is taken to be something quite different these days. It doesn't generally have the meaning that Schopenhauer at...
September 04, 2019 at 02:12
Go on then, what's the Mahabharata supposed to be? The capacity for doing work, which exists in potential, kinetic, thermal, electrical, chemical, nuc...
September 04, 2019 at 02:00
I own two books by Carlo Rovelli. In one them he praises Democritus and the atomists, whilst criticising Plato. Yes, I would shut down much of Augusti...
September 04, 2019 at 01:43
There are different theories. I have a book on quantum gravity, for example. What's your point? You think that the philosophy of Schopenhauer would be...
September 04, 2019 at 01:35
What? The cause of what? What are you referring to with "their"? The force would be the cause. Physics explains that.
September 04, 2019 at 01:30
Mediums of knowledge. And nothing in particular, just the general basics of physics, which I studied at G.C.S.E. level in secondary school, which I ow...
September 04, 2019 at 01:28
A force, like gravity. What I'm questioning is why anyone would give Schopenhauer with his Will or Newton with his God the time of day, instead of goi...
September 04, 2019 at 01:25
Not the description. It wouldn't attribute that to "Will", surely?
September 04, 2019 at 01:19
Yet I won't find that from any physics book. Why would you give old Schopenhauer more credence than modern physics?
September 04, 2019 at 01:11
Aha! Now I know you must be lying. Caught you red handed.
September 04, 2019 at 01:03
Last minute replacement. I was supposed to be meeting Professor Brian Cox, but instead I got Chevy Chase. You can imagine my disappointment.
September 04, 2019 at 00:54
They have quite a few similarities. Although, whereas Gove metaphorically knifed Boris in the back, Castlereagh literally shot Canning.
September 04, 2019 at 00:17
But there are some clear enough cases where we can tell. You're just setting the bar unreasonably high, as usual. And I don't think that it's intellec...
September 03, 2019 at 23:59
In: Brexit  — view comment
Well, if those numbers suggest that you'll be voting Labour, then you have my support. Where I'm from, we've been stuck with a Tory MP since 2010, and...
September 03, 2019 at 23:48
I could actually, because I could change my mind part way through. But this was a digression anyway, wasn't it? It doesn't even seem to matter. Not a ...
September 03, 2019 at 23:09
Ethical rights, not human rights. We are discussing a broader concept than human rights, specifically. And I don't need you to give me a rundown on th...
September 03, 2019 at 22:29
So, you claim that it's ridiculous, and then you respond by referencing way more ridiculous notions like natural law? Okay. Excuse me for looking for ...
September 03, 2019 at 22:16
Just hang 'em, then.
September 03, 2019 at 22:11
But the question is whether or not they're lying, and whether or not you can tell, not whether or not you're worried about it. Most of the time I'm no...
September 03, 2019 at 22:08
Do you feel better after that little vent? I clearly presented a foundation in moral sentiment. And those longer-term members who are familiar with my...
September 03, 2019 at 22:02
It would be an extremely remote possibility, so not something that I'd take seriously, because I'm reasonable like that. (As is Chevy Chase. He doesn'...
September 03, 2019 at 21:56
What? Wait, if this is some sort of subtle practical joke, given the title, then hats off to you. Yes, I do think that people can have some beliefs. A...
September 03, 2019 at 21:50
Seriously?
September 03, 2019 at 21:45
It can be difficult. It can also be pretty obvious. If I told you that I'm on the moon right now with Chevy Chase, would you believe me? Would you thi...
September 03, 2019 at 21:41
Well, close enough as a rough picture of how rights tend to work, and as a rough picture it's pretty obvious. But there are most probably deviants fro...
September 03, 2019 at 21:34
Hang, draw, and quarter.
September 03, 2019 at 21:16
Yes.
September 03, 2019 at 21:08
Jesus Christ. I'm talking about a world that must seem very strange to you indeed. I'm talking about the strange world of combining logic with your ow...
September 03, 2019 at 21:06
Oh, c'mon. I'd respond as you'd expect me to.
September 03, 2019 at 20:50
Academy Of Daft Ideas Academy Of Fuck Your Ideas Academy Of High Arrears Academy Of Great Big Ears Academy Of Fine Wine Academy Of Cheap Cider Academy...
September 03, 2019 at 20:31
I wouldn't disagree, because it's obvious. Isn't philosophy just great? You get to spend ages enquiring into things that you already know, and then, r...
September 03, 2019 at 20:05
If being philosophical means drawing no lines with regards to sensible enquiries, then I'm happy to be unphilosophical. But of course, it doesn't mean...
September 03, 2019 at 20:00
But it's the only possible justification. What's the supposed alternative? There is only subjective morality, irrespective of what you think moral sta...
September 03, 2019 at 19:55
Do you know how many discussions, and how much time I've spent, reading and participating against my own best interest? I only have so much self-contr...
September 03, 2019 at 19:50
Anyone else feel like this is spending too much time going over the basics... stuff we already know? I don't feel like I have been proven wrong over m...
September 03, 2019 at 19:42
We decide how we usually do, by consulting our respective conscience. I say it's wrong.
September 03, 2019 at 19:38
What of it? I already agreed with Hanover on basically the same point. In practical terms, obviously that would be a problem. Would it mean I'm wrong?...
September 03, 2019 at 19:35
Right, ethical rights can coincide with legal rights. They're not mutually exclusive. And it's no coincidence that they often coincide like that. Ther...
September 03, 2019 at 19:33
I think the answer's obvious either way. It's obvious that there are ethical rights in the subjective sense, and it's obvious that there's no basis fo...
September 03, 2019 at 19:27