No, you're putting words in my mouth. The conclusion of anti-natalism is that it's immoral to have children. There are justifiable grounds to reject t...
I'm claiming that anyone with half a brain can work out the implications of what the judge was saying, and that your typical response of requesting an...
I find your tactic of trying to gain the upper hand in this debate by making unreasonable requests of very specific and explicit statements of your ch...
Nah, it's that you repeatedly make the same error of wording statements stronger than is warranted, then get called out, then backtrack. You'll probab...
Okay, Mr. Pedantic. Then why do you think that? Yes, it says that it seems to me that it's more supportable for reasons x, y, z, and your reply says t...
So you'd rather have his speech published to a wide audience, which is exactly what he wants. And if, out of that audience, a number of people are con...
What on earth are you saying "yes" to? Are you talking to yourself? Because I said nothing of the sort. No, it wouldn't. Think it through. The media p...
And that's not enough of a basis to reasonably draw any relevant conclusion. If we didn't have hate speech laws in the U.K., then we might have had ev...
I know. The idea is to prevent terrorism, and where intelligence work can and does fail, there are other potential means. No, there's not zero evidenc...
Intelligence work failed to prevent the acts of terrorism mentioned in The Guardian article, whereas the enforcement of hate speech law at an earlier ...
You've offered no constructive criticism. Could hate speech legislation be improved? Possibly. And the way to go about that would be to get expert adv...
Right, so in your world, law enforcement is out of the window with regard to terrorist inspiring hate speech produced by the likes of Anjem Choudary, ...
You're welcome. :ok: I put it just fine, and you responded with unconstructive worries. "Ooh, but what if the wording isn't quite right?", "Ooh, but w...
It doesn't need to be foolproof. It just has to work well enough, which it has done in securing convinctions like that of Jayda Fransen and others. Wh...
But he's making perfect sense. Allow me to relay his argument for free will: You know how ships travel behind the horizon and back, and that that impl...
You two are on a bit of a tangent, anyway. Forget about noise complaints and plaid shirts for just a minute. The crux of the matter is whether or not ...
We can forget about the appeal to funny feelings, or "innate understandings", as you call them. Just get on with describing these observations and put...
You've changed your tune. I thought that it was an "innate understanding", i.e. a funny feeling. Those are your words, and I don't see why my interpre...
Then there would only be what seems to be will, but isn't. And that's the point: from what you've said about the idea of free will, you don't really k...
It's not drastically different. Anyone with extreme enough views about climate change will agree, and anyone who is already an anti-natalist for diffe...
No, not thousands. The search function narrows it down considerably, and in this case, you only have to scroll down to the end of the homepage to find...
As mentioned earlier, the case of Anjem Choudary. It says that he was convicted of terrorism offences, because they were obviously going to nail him f...
Okay, so you also think that will is only partly free. Can you do any better than Shamshir at providing an acceptable basis for how you supposedly kno...
I found out recently that Herodotus is known as the father of history, but also the father of bias. I guess that would make you something like his les...
I am, because it isn't free, only partly so. Why not call it "determined will", on that same basis? So it's as I suspected: just a feeling. Nothing su...
Comments