You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Moliere

['Member', 'Moderator', 'Subscriber']Joined: October 21, 2015 at 10:49Last active: February 25, 2026 at 23:3959 discussions6450 comments
Location: Republicantopia, USA

Bio

My mind is spaghetti -- satisfying yet tangled.

Typical autodidact, warts and all.

He/Him

I honestly should be reading more

oossian = USian

Favourite Quotations

“Our well-conditioned materialistic contemporaries are liable to burst with excitement over events such as the moonshots, the double helix, nonequilibrium thermodynamics. But let us look at the matter from a different point of view, and it becomes a ridiculous exercise in futility. It needed millions of dollars, thousands of well-trained assistants, years of hard work to enable some inarticulate and rather limited contemporaries to perform a few graceless hops in a place nobody in his right mind would think of visiting – a dried out, airless, hot stone. But mystics, using only their minds, travelled across the celestial spheres to God himself whom they viewed in his splendour receiving strength for continuing their lives and enlightenment for themselves and their fellow men. It is only the illiteracy of the general public and of their stern trainers that makes them reject such comparisons without further ado. A free society does not object to such an attitude but it will not permit it to become a basic ideology either.” (P. Feyerabend, Science In A Free Society, Verso/NLB 1982, p.31).

Discussions (59)

The Cogito

November 18, 2024 at 22:46 203 comments Metaphysics & Epistemology

Asexual Love

February 14, 2024 at 21:23 27 comments The Lounge

Ye Olde Meaning

August 01, 2023 at 00:03 112 comments Philosophy of Language

Masculinity

June 22, 2023 at 23:44 743 comments Ethics

New Atheism

February 18, 2023 at 01:37 42 comments The Lounge

Brains

December 09, 2022 at 01:25 97 comments Philosophy of Mind

Poem meaning

October 06, 2022 at 17:36 233 comments Philosophy of Art

Kuhnian Loss

July 09, 2022 at 18:34 23 comments Metaphysics & Epistemology

A holey theory

June 22, 2021 at 00:14 118 comments Metaphysics & Epistemology

Soundness

November 27, 2018 at 22:05 23 comments Logic & Philosophy of Mathematics

Modes of being

June 13, 2017 at 04:44 24 comments General Philosophy

Identity

July 21, 2016 at 18:44 42 comments General Philosophy

Comments

That makes sense to me. It's not like I know either way. I'm just following another path in the philosophy forest, as I like to call it.
February 16, 2026 at 23:15
Hrmm... almost a reason to suspect it already.... :D
February 16, 2026 at 23:13
If no physical instance is mathematically exact, and physicalism is true, then that does seem to imply that circularity is an invention of the mind be...
February 16, 2026 at 22:24
But those aren't circles. They look like circles in a rough sort of way and we can make approximations about its dimensions using the idea of a circle...
February 16, 2026 at 21:51
Good question. I'm sure that we don't know what meaning is. :D Or, at least, it's always appeared to me to be something like a mystery. To a point tha...
February 16, 2026 at 20:26
Hrm, well I feel like I do, which is why I was hoping you'd say what's not clicking :D In an effort for understanding I'll try and pick up the other s...
February 16, 2026 at 19:35
Unsuccessful Materiality-at-Hand Adorno starts by noting materiality-at-hand was thought of as a kind of way outside of the categories of the subject....
February 16, 2026 at 19:10
Here I want to note I agree. It's only that the outstripping is what makes it seem like it is unintelligible, and it's us who are making up the meanin...
February 16, 2026 at 16:41
By affirming an insight into the patterns which arise rather than affirming something of the nature of Being. I'm still talking about the world -- one...
February 16, 2026 at 16:17
I rather thought we got somewhere on this. I'm offering my objections from a different perspective, but I'd still say his reasoning is just fine. It's...
February 16, 2026 at 14:32
How do you know that? I'd rather say circles didn't exist prior to minds arising. Now maybe mind pre-exists humans and is in some way interwoven into ...
February 16, 2026 at 14:14
I suppose to me it is odd in relation to what philosophy purports to aspire towards, but you're right about human nature. But, then, human nature can ...
February 16, 2026 at 14:09
I've had a few thoughts in response to this. One is to go into truth-aptness to demonstrate how truth-aptness does not justify an inference to somethi...
February 16, 2026 at 13:57
I've been challenging this notion that metaphysics underwrites all science. I can understand what you say here. I suppose I believe that we can grasp ...
February 13, 2026 at 23:42
That's interesting. Yes, many fields do. Would judges, in a court of law, count? I think logical positivism is a worthy area of study. Basically I thi...
February 13, 2026 at 00:24
:rofl:
February 12, 2026 at 23:37
I think that's the attitude I'm encouraging. Though, to be fair, the children second-guess everything the parents/grandparents do, too -- and it'd be ...
February 12, 2026 at 23:19
I don't think so, no. But I don't know, either -- I'm not sure if we'd be able to even poll the group "All Scientists" due to lack of ability to ask e...
February 12, 2026 at 22:19
I want to say that intelligibility, causation, and the idea of an ordered world can be metaphysical presuppositions, but I don't believe they must be ...
February 12, 2026 at 20:52
Is science built upon philosophical axioms? Is "Reality can be understood" an axiomatic belief? My thought is that scientism is the belief that scienc...
February 12, 2026 at 15:11
Yes. I'd put it that science shares a genealogy from philosophy, but has become something a bit different than what philosophy has pursued in doing me...
February 12, 2026 at 03:20
I'd like to differentiate myself from positivists in some way. I wouldn't put it like that. To use Srap's story -- it's not like the grandparents ceas...
February 12, 2026 at 02:00
I've enjoyed your contributions to this thread. Does this then mean that philosophy actually has evidence that it "does" something?! :D I never though...
February 12, 2026 at 01:00
That helps put him in perspective for me. Both/and here as well. I say that naturalism is my prejudice, though, because I don't believe that it's an o...
February 11, 2026 at 16:11
That's a fair question. I think I've thought "no" to this question so long, while being sympathetic to naturalism and pondering it, that I find the ar...
February 09, 2026 at 23:26
Something along those lines though I don't want to put the onus on "ingredients" as if there's a material world with powers invested in it and these p...
February 09, 2026 at 20:19
For me I found myself saying "But..." at his depictions of naturalism. I find phenomenology -- even participatory metaphysics -- as compatible with a ...
February 09, 2026 at 13:54
Heh thanks. I didn't know and mostly was just worried that I went out into left field too much.
February 06, 2026 at 23:21
Fair point. I'll try to stay more focused. These were just my first thoughts. Cool. Sorry for starting out critically, then. It was my first instinct ...
February 06, 2026 at 23:07
I agree. Not "merely" aesthetic -- but aesthetic. Epistemic virtues work well enough for me. I wouldn't draw a hard distinction between ethics and aes...
February 06, 2026 at 22:41
Let me try a different formulation then. The argument is going to sound plausible to those who reject naturalism as an adequate metaphysics and not pl...
February 06, 2026 at 22:14
I'd say there's no measure to reality itself. When we're distinguishing theories with these criteria -- scope, unification, etc. -- we're comparing an...
February 06, 2026 at 18:53
Relating back to @"Tom Storm" (sorry for going a bit off topic there) I find this argument lacking because it depends entirely on one's beliefs. If on...
February 06, 2026 at 16:02
This is where things are a bit tricky I think. It's not so much that it failed to track what was actually the case but that a different way of looking...
February 06, 2026 at 15:04
:up: Cheers. I want to note that I only meant that we're talking about how we talk about when we're talking about metaphysics, epistemology, science, ...
February 06, 2026 at 03:53
Oh, yes. Definitely. I love science because of this magnificence. I'm of the opposite opinion. I'm sure you're surprised ;) Yes, it is like winning th...
February 05, 2026 at 23:27
I don't think so. This is the co-constitution going on, I think. Yes, we're talking about something. That's what talking often is. And we can satisfy ...
February 05, 2026 at 23:09
My thought is we do both, and more. There is sometimes an asymmetry -- but I'd put it that this is when we're approaching a collective practice. The a...
February 05, 2026 at 22:48
A bit. Though I ought note that scientists have already ventured beyond "the big bang" in terms of physics and such. Scientists don't stop. The natura...
February 05, 2026 at 22:29
My thought here is that I jumped in when you were on board with the general phenomenological thrust of things: to use an idea from @"fdrake" "warrante...
February 05, 2026 at 22:26
I'm not sure that they are. Though... I don't think that follows, either. Couldn't it be the case that norms are always historically bound -- situated...
February 05, 2026 at 21:35
I think this gets an understanding of scientific laws backwards: it isn't that there are laws to which we are approximating but rather we crave certai...
February 05, 2026 at 21:32
Sure it's unbelievable, on its face. Why else would it take so much effort to demonstrate, and even after such demonstrations people's beliefs often p...
February 05, 2026 at 20:28
I'd say statements are normatively answerable to truth because our communities are set up in a manner such that we can demonstrate "true" or "false". ...
February 05, 2026 at 20:22
Have you heard of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller%E2%80%93Urey_experiment ?
February 05, 2026 at 20:02
Your implausibility is based upon: Implying that complexity cannot be the result of physical processes without at least a divine spark or push to give...
February 05, 2026 at 19:02
I'm finding your pre-Kant, Kant, post-Kant descriptions spot on and very clear and concise. Nice.
February 02, 2026 at 20:07
Nice.
January 30, 2026 at 23:14
Today I did a fast read from Disempowerment of the Subject to No-Man's Land. I feel like I understand his argument a bit better now and want to put it...
January 30, 2026 at 01:20
M'kay. I think I'm tracking well enough: "overall experience" is the synthesis of experiential qualities into a whole. Would the experiential axes all...
January 29, 2026 at 23:24