You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Jamal

Comments

What I said about them is based on what they have said they want to do and what they say motivates their actions, which are in turn consistent with th...
November 16, 2015 at 13:16
Frankly Benkei, this is rancid. I mentioned "secular values, freedom for women, reason and the diversity of cultural heritage, democracy, dissent, and...
November 16, 2015 at 13:12
This article points towards some answers: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/03/what-isis-really-wants/384980/
November 16, 2015 at 12:44
You might want to read the article instead of imposing your readymade cartoon narratives on to what I'm saying. I'm not making it about us and them, i...
November 16, 2015 at 12:36
I'll take that as a "no", at least to the first question. The problem is that there is a bunch of bloodthirsty genocidal dickheads with power and terr...
November 16, 2015 at 12:30
Have you read the article? Also, are you suggesting that the defeat of ISIS is not a worthy goal?
November 16, 2015 at 12:20
Thanks, got it.
November 16, 2015 at 12:15
@"ArguingWAristotleTiff" Okay now mention me.
November 16, 2015 at 12:13
Your characterization of my position does not follow from the words I quoted from Kenan Malik. You're joking, right?
November 16, 2015 at 12:12
Yes, and? What does that have to do with your characterization of my position--the one I objected to?
November 16, 2015 at 12:07
Just a note to point out that I did not say anything remotely like this, nor would I.
November 16, 2015 at 12:05
But ISIS is not a group whose immediate targets are Western states, and they are not motivated primarily by anti-imperialism, and they are not made up...
November 16, 2015 at 11:43
Yes, that article was an education for me too. It casts doubt on the oft-heard opinion, expressed already in this thread, that military action is usel...
November 16, 2015 at 11:35
Once again, many lefties and liberals rush to characterize this attack as an understandable response to Western militarism. It seems like a willful bl...
November 16, 2015 at 11:25
I can hardly imagine a sentiment further from the spirit of science and free enquiry.
November 15, 2015 at 08:28
I am willing to sacrifice my reputation for the good of the community. O:)
November 13, 2015 at 14:53
Thanks for the like :D
November 13, 2015 at 14:50
I think I agree.
November 13, 2015 at 14:49
Quick question: wouldn't "Hello!" be treated as a sentence in linguistics?
November 13, 2015 at 14:47
A supplementary question to that option is this. If it is not in fact possible to do that, or not possible for a while, would you rather have likes as...
November 13, 2015 at 14:45
That is very cool.
November 13, 2015 at 12:51
70s Iranian funk. I'm guessing 1979 put a stop to this sort of thing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2UxJ9LtsTs
November 13, 2015 at 12:31
Looks like it's a Bing thing. The same search here, without quotes, returns TPF in second place behind you know who. Pretty cool.
November 12, 2015 at 13:23
By "Man's primeval nature" I take Arkady to be referring to Kwalish Kid, but he's yet to find his way here.
November 12, 2015 at 09:21
You're welcome to submit it darth.
November 11, 2015 at 16:10
Talking of baking, my girlfriend made bagels today. I didn't realize the chewy texture came from boiling them.
November 11, 2015 at 14:39
You click on the first link that goes to another article.
November 11, 2015 at 13:21
Amateur! (Though it happened to me too)
November 11, 2015 at 09:56
Where did @"Hanover" go?
November 10, 2015 at 20:23
/uploads/files/ra/8g9ad36ve9aee7mt.jpg
November 10, 2015 at 18:15
Almost, but the first link in consciousness is 'quality'.
November 10, 2015 at 14:23
@"shmik"'s in the lead so far. The object of the game, I suppose, is to find the least philosophical thing on wikipedia. Note: when any links go to a ...
November 10, 2015 at 08:37
It was quite remarkable that in each case the last several steps were the same, beginning at natural science, even in the case of Bieber.
November 10, 2015 at 08:26
If you do know that the sun will rise in the east, we'll grant you all the rest. But do you?
November 10, 2015 at 06:19
But "I don't believe X: I know X" means "I don't just believe X: I know X", and this is often how the colloquial use is put. It's very much in line wi...
November 10, 2015 at 06:08
What empirical evidence?
November 08, 2015 at 12:16
Cool. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/color/
November 08, 2015 at 12:09
It's very controversial in philosophy, which is what we're doing here (saying that "I don't think it's a philosophical issue" is a philosophical point...
November 08, 2015 at 12:07
I and a great many philosophers (it's not a minority view as far as I can see) totally disagree. But I'm not here to argue the case; I intervened to e...
November 08, 2015 at 11:59
This really will not do. You are asking us to take your verificationist argument to be unassailable. I was inviting you to engage with the actual phil...
November 08, 2015 at 11:52
Good point. Done.
November 08, 2015 at 11:46
I wasn't trying to change your mind. I was showing that it was incumbent on you not to present a controversial thesis as if it were obvious. And if yo...
November 08, 2015 at 11:42
I thought that his use of analytic/synthetic to describe the different methods of the Prolegomena and the CPR respectively was mostly unrelated to his...
November 08, 2015 at 04:49
It's not a problem, John. The more discussion the better. :) But that's just an uncharitable reformulation of what I said. It is this interpretation t...
November 08, 2015 at 04:42
Only subscribers get to upload files as things stand.
November 08, 2015 at 03:55
Right, I wrote this too so I'll post it. Then I'll hold off for a while. And if anyone thinks these walls of text aren't suitable for the thread, let ...
November 07, 2015 at 20:20
Nice post @"Moliere". One thing I avoided when writing my own summary was this: Can you say more about what he means by this? I was never quite sure.
November 07, 2015 at 20:16
Note that colour realism and objectivism are popular views among philosophers. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/color/
November 07, 2015 at 16:20
You're right, I'm not very interested, but I'm smarting from the charge of internal incoherence, so let me try again. Between making use of the distin...
November 07, 2015 at 07:49
Here’s my bit about the preface. Preface or Introduction First, I like that it's well-written, which is not something Kant is famous for. But he could...
November 07, 2015 at 06:15