You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Jamal

Comments

My position doesn't demand that I address such a possibility, because I have been fairly explicitly presuming all along that it is not the case. That ...
November 07, 2015 at 05:28
No, like I said, "what I accepted was that there are times when I can't tell whether or not what seems to be there is there", but in the wider context...
November 07, 2015 at 05:07
Indeed, I tried to make that point in various ways, but it doesn't satisfy TG.
November 07, 2015 at 02:32
The dream argument works against anyone who takes what is evident in experience to warrant belief in anything at all. It is cogent insofar as one thin...
November 06, 2015 at 21:10
No, I don't agree. I was hallucinating then, and now I'm not. But wait, I can't know that I'm not now hallucinating either: what if it's all hallucina...
November 06, 2015 at 20:38
But I never said that I can't make that distinction. What I accepted was that there are times when I can't tell whether or not what seems to be there ...
November 06, 2015 at 20:06
When you say "your theory", do you mean the following claims taken together? Subjectively, I can't tell the difference between a hallucination and a g...
November 06, 2015 at 18:09
Like I say, subjective indistinguishability does not entail that I cannot successfully make the distinction based on what I know hallucination to be, ...
November 06, 2015 at 17:39
I don't know why my answers haven't been enough. Maybe I just don't know what you're getting at. And I've already said I had no interest in defending ...
November 06, 2015 at 16:58
Is that because he's a well-known masochist. ;)
November 06, 2015 at 16:29
If we agree there's a difference, then I don't know what the problem is. Knowing there's a difference between hallucination and perception doesn't dep...
November 06, 2015 at 16:24
I pretty much agree with this, but I think there's another way of looking at it. Kant regarded metaphysics as a natural disposition, and if this is th...
November 06, 2015 at 08:33
When I was reading the CPR I found this glossary of Kant's technical terms extremely useful: http://staffweb.hkbu.edu.hk/ppp/ksp1/KSPglos.html
November 06, 2015 at 07:41
I don't see the difference. Can you explain it? As far as I can see you're saying that the realist is not warranted in drawing a distinction between h...
November 06, 2015 at 06:59
Done. I suggest first reading the Preface ("Introduction" in Bennett's version) and Preamble and then comparing notes. Looks like you're already there...
November 05, 2015 at 22:28
Welcome :)
November 05, 2015 at 22:18
It strikes me this discussion would work well as a more formal reading group, especially if @"Moliere" is on board. So, you'd agree to read a section ...
November 05, 2015 at 08:00
@"The Great Whatever", you make three important accusations: 1. That I misrepresent indirect realism or ignore its strongest versions 2. That I falsel...
November 05, 2015 at 07:53
Are you saying this from the point of view of someone thinking about how best to do metaphysics? In saying that metaphysics is non-empirical, Kant is ...
November 04, 2015 at 20:29
But wouldn't we then say that we're doing natural science when we go by empirical evidence, but when we ask, e.g., about what is beyond them--for whic...
November 04, 2015 at 19:43
This is a great idea; I similarly struggled to understand his posts but liked a lot of what he had to say. I'll add it to the list for December. The o...
November 04, 2015 at 18:26
In the old PF you also have to scroll to find the post you want to quote, and then you would click "Quote" and it would take you to the reply page. He...
November 04, 2015 at 17:23
Not sure what you mean about the menu bar. And as for having to scroll up, are you talking about in discussion threads? Isn't it inevitable that you h...
November 04, 2015 at 17:06
All right, it looks like it's Davidson for this month. Anyone got a nice version and I'll start a new thread?
November 04, 2015 at 15:55
By the way, @"The Great Whatever", work is getting in the way. I'll reply to you as soon as I can. I'm going to address these accusations: 1. That I m...
November 04, 2015 at 07:18
Thanks John, I'd love to see your comments if you do get around to reading it.
November 04, 2015 at 07:15
Yes indeed. There is much more than mere line, colour, texture and so on in most abstract paintings, and I haven't done justice to that in my comments...
November 04, 2015 at 07:08
Personally I find abstract art far less confusing than figurative art. Confronted with a scene by Caravaggio, for instance, I struggle to work out wha...
November 04, 2015 at 04:17
He joined already, as you can see here. Hasn't posted anything though.
November 04, 2015 at 03:44
On the face of it, abstract art seems even more naturally suited to channel a perception or contemplation of the Ideas than representational art is. T...
November 04, 2015 at 03:39
Your linguistic analysis looks good to me, but I still don't see how it goes against my criticism of The Argument. To see this, here is Russell's vers...
November 03, 2015 at 19:11
For what? I.e., for what search term? That's what matters. After all, we're at the very top of the search results for "thephilosophyforum.com" (with t...
November 03, 2015 at 11:47
Shot of a lifetime, that one!
November 03, 2015 at 06:28
See the thread for feature requests: thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/30/feature-requests. The OP has a continually updated list. I've asked support ...
November 02, 2015 at 20:21
Thanks Street, I'll read that Lingis article.
November 02, 2015 at 11:48
First I'd like to say--and I don't say this to absolve myself of the responsibility for defending the article--that I wrote this article a couple of y...
November 02, 2015 at 11:37
Thanks :)
November 02, 2015 at 10:36
I really like square and abstract too. Those are great. Me, I started taking photos of people this summer, which I've never done before. /uploads/resi...
November 02, 2015 at 09:52
The solution is to overcome your prejudices.
November 02, 2015 at 05:39
In: Bad Art  — view comment
Unusually, I agree with you.
November 02, 2015 at 04:52
This is the proper thread for feature requests so I deleted your second comment. Thanks for the feedback. I've added it to the list in the OP.
November 02, 2015 at 04:04
Hi @"Agustino" We'll be setting up a thread here on the forum for artistic work, and we don't intend to publish poems or stories on the Articles site,...
November 02, 2015 at 03:53
Two others have mentioned this as well so I've added it to the feature requests here: http://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/30/feature-requests/p1 ...
November 01, 2015 at 11:19
8-)
November 01, 2015 at 05:12
I'm not surprised someone pounced on the weakest sentence in the article, "If I think about my own perceptual experiences, it is obvious that...", whi...
November 01, 2015 at 03:02
Who could argue?
October 31, 2015 at 19:10
By the way, I didn't include these because I thought something longer and meatier would be more suitable. And my guess is most people have read the Na...
October 31, 2015 at 11:12
Personally that's the one that appeals to me least among those mentioned. But once we have a couple more suggestions, including one on ethics, I'll cr...
October 30, 2015 at 11:11
Oh right, I see. Fair enough.
October 30, 2015 at 10:58
I'd like to give some anecdotal evidence that for me lends weight to the thesis that the mind is not bound by the skin and skull. As some of you know,...
October 30, 2015 at 07:48