You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

javi2541997

Comments

What, what? :eyes: What did I say wrong that you didn't understand me?
August 02, 2023 at 07:58
I understand. Thanks for your kindness, Jamal.
August 02, 2023 at 07:57
Nearly 500 pages of this deep philosophical substantive thread. Hey, instead of discussing like a Ping-Pong game, we should discuss why this was never...
August 02, 2023 at 07:37
Why we should know anyway? objective exists both separately and independently from us. It doesn't matter if we "know" or "are aware" if it does exist ...
August 02, 2023 at 07:34
Interesting. Thanks BC. I learned a new lesson on English grammar this morning, while I am taking my breakfast. :up:
August 02, 2023 at 05:56
Exactly. No, I use them as different terms as clearly. On one hand, we have "being" that needs a precise definition of its concept. Every object is a ...
August 02, 2023 at 05:52
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0ybW_hXhnUo
August 01, 2023 at 21:00
I didn't know that definition of Aquinas. I personally think that it is simplistic and drives us to reductionism. I would understand it in a theologic...
August 01, 2023 at 18:07
Wow! Thanks for sharing, Gnomon. That’s the definition of objective and subjective I urgently need. I am currently having a debate on this matter with...
August 01, 2023 at 16:39
I don't know if it is a platonic form of definition. But I would define truth as "the reality itself when it is perceived objectively". Exactly. What ...
August 01, 2023 at 13:26
Empiricists cut through the issue by reducing the objects of perception to the perceptions themselves. This would make it difficult to define what a h...
August 01, 2023 at 12:47
I like the reply of @"Philosophim". It is very clear. On the other hand, I respect your point that the problem of philosophy nowadays is giving defini...
August 01, 2023 at 06:54
Hello Bob Ross! I cannot say that truth is subjective either. But you claimed that reality is mind-dependent and thus, there can be no asserted being ...
August 01, 2023 at 06:48
Yes. It is a coincidence that @"Hanover" is from Georgia. :snicker:
July 31, 2023 at 17:58
Well, you are referring to your own criteria. You can't really know what the mind of the rest is or what they are attracted by. I simply do not unders...
July 31, 2023 at 17:21
I understand. The participation of many users in a single thread can be chaotic but the line of importance/attraction is blurred in these cases. Maybe...
July 31, 2023 at 08:43
I agree. But here we end up in the same dilemma. If one thread doesn't get one or five replies at least, it will not be considered as "interesting" or...
July 31, 2023 at 08:04
I know that some of you don't act in the way I refer to in my arguments. But you are just a few. What I tend to argue is some facts about why some dis...
July 31, 2023 at 06:35
Good point.
July 30, 2023 at 20:51
I agree with your opinion, Amity :up:
July 30, 2023 at 16:54
I am curious about this fact. I think there could be two groups of members: one group where the people don't take part in discussions because they don...
July 30, 2023 at 16:53
I agree that activity is not necessarily connected with the importance of a thread, but when any of them doesn't get any reply at all, it seems that i...
July 30, 2023 at 06:17
Interesting thought. You are right in this point. But I think it is complex to apply it on this site where the activity depends on the number of repli...
July 29, 2023 at 20:00
Yes, I am aware that it is not a "thread" at all, because it is posted in "article submissions" with the aim of having some exchanges and maybe not a ...
July 29, 2023 at 18:48
You are welcome, friend. :up:
July 29, 2023 at 17:00
Indeed.
July 29, 2023 at 16:03
What a good thread, Alkis! I do not understand why you didn't have any reply at all. You explained pretty well what each thread should have. I wish ea...
July 29, 2023 at 16:03
Yes.
July 29, 2023 at 15:46
Well, it is a big debate on what we consider "quality" on this site when the subjective interferes and depends (a lot) on who is the author of each th...
July 29, 2023 at 14:44
No. They should move this “thread” (just a question and an emoji) to The Lounge. :smile:
July 29, 2023 at 12:23
Can't believe that an OP of just two phrases is not put in The Lounge.
July 29, 2023 at 08:05
Clever move, indeed!
July 28, 2023 at 21:00
Interesting! I am going to use your wisdom from now on. Again, I appreciate all this information which helps me out. I agree! This is why I find this ...
July 28, 2023 at 20:58
Well, I don't see any, but I presume Jack is there, but the toy hasn't popped up yet. Having a picture of the toy can explain why I can only imagine "...
July 28, 2023 at 19:48
Thanks :up: I appreciate your comment and support. By the way, coming back to the original post and focusing on your analysis. I. It's interesting how...
July 28, 2023 at 19:38
Thanks for those books recommendations :up: Why are you keeping posting here? Didn't you consider this OP as “not philosophical”?
July 28, 2023 at 17:59
OK, I respect your decision! Muchísimas gracias Jamal! I thought you had a different opinion on me.
July 28, 2023 at 17:12
You can even remove it if you want. But please do not be a hypocrite regarding what OP deserves more respect than other. At least we are not debating ...
July 28, 2023 at 17:02
Oh! in each object, yes. You are referring to a scenario where there are multiple objects: twenty boxes and then twenty Jacks. I understand your point...
July 28, 2023 at 16:06
But how can we know that? I thought this word is tricky because of its plural conjugation precisely. Either you can pluralize Jack or pluralize box, I...
July 28, 2023 at 15:34
@"Sir2u" and @"T Clark" stated that there is plural of Jack. Thus, more than one Jack in a single box. The latter doesn't change.
July 28, 2023 at 14:56
OK. This is so interesting. Clarky is American, and sir2u is British. Yet, you both have interpreted the same regarding that there could be more than ...
July 28, 2023 at 14:53
I agree with you. When I was reading the paper by Steven Pinker, I had some difficulties with the pronunciation, and my tongue suffered instead of bei...
July 28, 2023 at 14:49
I like your comments and you contribute with good arguments. They make me think for a while, indeed. I was just debating with you, that's the nature o...
July 28, 2023 at 08:30
What is the main difference? You can seek for mercy in both controlled way and free will. I would include redemption in our acts. But a Christian (or ...
July 27, 2023 at 20:35
The relationship is contradictory because religion seeks purity while sex is, somehow, related to "corruption" of the bodies. With the aim of reaching...
July 27, 2023 at 18:27
Exactly. There is not a competition, and the activity is there to improve our creativity skills. I think it is worthy to take part in the entries. Thi...
July 27, 2023 at 11:28
I wish you will stay until the next week, when the literary activity starts, and I remember that you were a good commentator in the stories. :smile:
July 27, 2023 at 10:18
Glad to see @"Amity" posting in TPF again. :flower:
July 27, 2023 at 09:45
Wow! you are deep in Murakami's world! I know that feeling. When you start reading his books, it is impossible to get rid of him.
July 26, 2023 at 16:19