You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Benkei

Comments

In: Euclidea  — view comment
double checked but it really is 4.11. Maybe you need a certain amount of stars.? I have 24 in delta.
July 11, 2021 at 07:53
Yeah, I've heard that one before too. It's unfortunately the fame type of people that came over on the weekend to party in Amsterdam. The one benefit ...
July 11, 2021 at 07:28
In: Euclidea  — view comment
@"Banno" any hints for 4.11?
July 11, 2021 at 07:26
Just because of the behaviour of some of their supporters they should be disqualified. Animals.
July 11, 2021 at 07:24
Well, we could put something like that to a vote. I'm not married to a number, 2 is what I'm used to as a lawyer and if life and death situation can b...
July 11, 2021 at 07:15
I think debates could improve if a limit to the amount posts is established. 2 each should be enough.
July 11, 2021 at 06:06
In: Euclidea  — view comment
2.7 with only 1 line is fun. I had to think about that again.
July 10, 2021 at 10:30
Then at least with regard to the Grundnorm we're in agreement. I hated it already in my first year of law school. Hart always made the most sense, for...
July 10, 2021 at 10:28
In: Euclidea  — view comment
Yeah, I have that solution in my history but I no longer understand why this gives me the correct points. If I ignore 1.5 for now I can solve at least...
July 10, 2021 at 10:27
In: Euclidea  — view comment
Meanwhile, still stuck on 1.5 :rofl:
July 10, 2021 at 10:01
In: Euclidea  — view comment
Take the base line, extend it to the left with the length of the diagonal, extend it to the right with the vertical length, divide that total length b...
July 10, 2021 at 10:00
That's a bit of an "open door" as we say in Dutch. Dancing could be a source of law based on such a description. I was hoping to go a bit deeper than ...
July 10, 2021 at 08:14
https://chinanever.com/categories/phones-not-made-in-china they have some other categories as well.
July 09, 2021 at 13:46
In: Euclidea  — view comment
Not for me thanks. I remember that if you don't really understand why a solution works you'll get stuck again at a later point. So if someone explains...
July 09, 2021 at 08:16
In: Euclidea  — view comment
I just started again. Already stuck at 1.5. Can't understand how I ever got to theta! :sweat:
July 09, 2021 at 08:06
thanks. Google translate resulted in fomenting legible and understandable. :up:
July 09, 2021 at 08:05
In: Euclidea  — view comment
Are you getting all the stars? I only got all the stars for beta and never got beyond theta level 1.
July 09, 2021 at 07:48
Do you have links in English to those cases against inditex and zara? Could be a blueprint for more. In an ideal world, we would be raising tariffs. N...
July 09, 2021 at 07:35
In: Euclidea  — view comment
I got stuck regularly in this game and never finished it. I did complete that one about 2 years ago and just started it again and I'm stuck in level 2...
July 09, 2021 at 06:14
So I've just written to an electronics review site to start including information about sourcing of materials and start taking human rights abuses int...
July 09, 2021 at 04:58
Does anything change because we discussed it here? I'm discussing it because I think it's interesting and I'm in a good mood which means I'm more open...
July 08, 2021 at 21:09
In: Bannings  — view comment
Report. Report. Report. I have a lower tolerance for low quality posters in certain areas than other moderators, which means I often don't propose a p...
July 08, 2021 at 14:58
Mainly this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_norm Hanover and I have a long-standing disagreement about whether, for instance, international law i...
July 08, 2021 at 14:51
In: Bannings  — view comment
What are you trying to accomplish? That I'll suddenly change my behaviour because some internet random says I'm a coward and don't have integrity? Wha...
July 08, 2021 at 12:52
In: Bannings  — view comment
I don't have balls so yeah, easy enough.
July 08, 2021 at 12:43
In: Bannings  — view comment
There's nothing inconsistent about it, you're just disappointed. You're welcome to vent in this thread.
July 08, 2021 at 12:32
In: Bannings  — view comment
The reason for banning has previously been given by Baden. He's previously been discussed by moderators for several reasons, given the benefit of the ...
July 08, 2021 at 10:44
In: Bannings  — view comment
We're generally lax with moderating swearing and name calling because this is the internet after all and if it's accompanied with decent philosophy, w...
July 08, 2021 at 10:24
It is a theory but it's not recognised as such in analytical jurisprudence. The closest to it would probably be legal positivism which suffers from "t...
July 06, 2021 at 14:51
I reject procedural requirements because you end up with circular reasoning. Procedural laws are after all laws themselves, so you end up with: the la...
July 06, 2021 at 13:42
We should get @"Tobias" in here as well. :smile: I'm not convinced I'm arguing for higher laws or principles and I'm not sure what I said that makes y...
July 06, 2021 at 12:28
I think there's a fundamental difference then, which was exactly the reason I raised the example of inability to enforce first. A more extreme example...
July 05, 2021 at 09:09
I thought vaccination did lower spread as well, since not everybody gets sick and asymptomatic infection happens but also at a lower rate than symptom...
July 05, 2021 at 05:02
True. The problem with politics is that they are too often a zero sum game and people take positions instead of enter interest based negotiations. The...
July 04, 2021 at 18:16
Of course there's a difference. I was responding to the idea that enforcement is a criteria between whether something is the law or isn't. I guess we ...
July 04, 2021 at 18:10
I know this but that doesn't mean it wasn't illegal by international law standards, which, by the way, the US tried to underline again by pretending S...
July 04, 2021 at 13:53
If you agree by treaty that your won't go to war except in self defence or with UN security counsel approval then not abiding by those rules makes the...
July 04, 2021 at 12:24
No, you haven't addressed this, you've only demonstrated you don't know how international law works. When you sign a treaty it's pacta sunt servanda. ...
July 04, 2021 at 11:46
As I said, this is a retarded argument on par with climate change denialism. The US has signed the UN Charter and thereby willingly submitted to those...
July 04, 2021 at 08:20
Succinct as usual.
July 03, 2021 at 21:09
This is first and foremost a red herring, whatever we can say about Saddam has no bearing on the fact the war in Iraq was illegal and started on a lie...
July 03, 2021 at 20:54
I'll remind you that in my first post I already referred to the multi national force, so I'm quite aware. Are you referring to the token forces from A...
July 03, 2021 at 16:11
Really? Which ones?
July 03, 2021 at 11:20
Yes, but that wasn't what you were talking about because that is not the war that was the basis for removing Saddam.
July 03, 2021 at 10:02
said the #£@@&# who won almost all of them in the past! :rage:
July 02, 2021 at 18:12
Which 35 countries? Those that were part of the multi-national force? No countries in the region were part of that. And I'd argue that 35 countries di...
July 02, 2021 at 11:50
I think it's perfectly fine to come to that decision by yourself for yourself. What I reject is judging others for making different decisions in such ...
July 02, 2021 at 04:47
What was Arendt's argument that such a person has moral agency? Because I don't see it. You take someone's freedom, then you give him two shitty choic...
July 01, 2021 at 20:14
you have a weird idea of morality. Should I care about redeeming qualities of Rumsfeld in his personal life when I have no personal relationship with ...
July 01, 2021 at 16:53
But don't you think that's weird? So ok to celebrate and remember a good person's life but not ok to piss on the memory of someone because he was an a...
July 01, 2021 at 15:45