Euclidea
Euclidea
This sort of geometric reasoning is out of favour. It does not appear in modern curricula. But I think it is brilliant. There is so much exquisite beauty in the patterns of lines and circles.
Thoughts?
This sort of geometric reasoning is out of favour. It does not appear in modern curricula. But I think it is brilliant. There is so much exquisite beauty in the patterns of lines and circles.
Thoughts?
Comments (37)
The answers are somewhere between cogitation and intuition.
I know I've solved it before, but can't see it now.
I'll have a look if I accidentally remember how 7.1 goes.
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All play and no work makes Jack a grasshopper.
Side length of second square = y
Side length of third square = z
x² + y² = z²
3² + 4² = 5²
Pythagoras' theorem. :up:
I didn't enjoy maths as a child but I do remember finding the idea of Pythagoras' s hypothenuse triangle to be very exciting. I also do like the geometry of circles and lines too, but somehow got on so much better in exploring them in art, rather than in geometry lessons.
Art & Math go a long way back I believe: Proportio Divina.
Jack = 4 letters
Cummins = 7 letters
7/phi = 4.326 = 4
(7 + 4)/phi = 11/phi = 6.799 = 7
The gloves didn't fit O. J. Simpson!
Anyone?
Solution to 1.5
[hide="Reveal"]Bisect the diagonal from bottom left to top right. intersection with top and base gives your points.[/hide]
This is fun, more distraction from actual work, so thanks for pointing it out. I'm stuck on 2.8 though, I can't get the 3E solution. One element has to be the tangent itself, so that doesn't leave enough elements for the way I was taught to do it (back when we inscribed all this on clay tablets, of course).
If anyone has any hints - without giving the actual answer, I'd appreciate a pointer.
Got it! Thanks.