You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

_db

Comments

The Fascism This Time, Theo Horesh. Also Heart of Darkness, Joseph Conrad. Cannot read it right now, the copy I got has so many notes on every page th...
October 09, 2021 at 16:02
Why is it so difficult to pin down what makes a life good? Why is it the case that countless pages have been written on this topic (in philosophy, poe...
October 08, 2021 at 21:01
In: Hobbies  — view comment
That's cool, had no idea you had that deep of a background in RPGs. I played 5e off and on through college and afterwards; I was a DM for a Star Wars ...
October 04, 2021 at 02:16
Wait, so let me get this straight: Journalists, with no expertise in the field they are reporting, can publish inaccurate articles, and may even do so...
October 03, 2021 at 22:50
In: Hobbies  — view comment
Looks good, I love roasted kale with olive oil and salt. DnD, Shadowrun...? I got into 5e back in college; during the pandemic I played some virtually...
October 03, 2021 at 20:33
Yeah, my argument rests on the absurdity of someone having a good life when they don't recognize it as such. The very possibility of doubting the good...
October 02, 2021 at 02:59
In: Realism  — view comment
Very interesting, thanks.
October 02, 2021 at 02:30
American Extremist: The Psychology of Political Extremism, Josh Neal. Well, I'm an idiot, that guy's a white supremacist :vomit: Neither could I, it w...
October 01, 2021 at 21:35
Indeed, though one objection, and I mean no offense, but wrapping a word in quotes makes it suspiciously imprecise. Either someone is forced to live b...
October 01, 2021 at 02:11
For what reason can it not be said how much the pain hurts, as a matter of fact?
October 01, 2021 at 01:47
There is a long history of debate about what qualifies as a good life, but what I have not seen much of is a meta-analysis of the debate itself; we de...
September 30, 2021 at 04:09
So yeah, it's as @"schopenhauer1" alluded to earlier, if the value of something is entirely subjective, then there won't be any sense in which we can ...
September 30, 2021 at 02:46
It might not be absurd for someone to hold a socially-conditioned belief (i.e. we can make sense of why they believe what they believe), but it does n...
September 28, 2021 at 03:12
Yes. Just as Stacey must believe that Paul is her boyfriend in order for Paul to be her boyfriend, Stacey must believe that she has a good life in ord...
September 28, 2021 at 03:02
Yeah, I wasn't able to follow your objection, can you clarify it?
September 26, 2021 at 19:06
No, they'll figure out some reason to be against it. :up:
September 26, 2021 at 02:57
An interesting question, something I have also wondered a lot about too :up: Fundamentally, I believe it is an issue with technology, and not just thi...
September 26, 2021 at 02:12
This is not as controversial as you might think. Against the Grain has already been mentioned, fantastic book. After the Ice is another which explicit...
September 26, 2021 at 01:30
Castle to Castle, Céline. The Murder of Professor Schlick: the Rise and Fall of the Vienna Circle, David Edmonds.
September 25, 2021 at 20:22
I am preaching to the choir here, but procreation is taken to be a sacred activity. Having children is taken to be one of the most critical and sublim...
September 25, 2021 at 19:38
Not sure I follow, my point was that both Stacey having a boyfriend and having a good life depend on objective and subjective components.
September 25, 2021 at 19:26
I started off with the assumption that it seemed obvious that it does entail this recognition, though it seems not everyone agrees. Consider the propo...
September 24, 2021 at 21:49
Okay, so you disagree with the initial premise. I never argued for it, that's fair. I did not include the possibility that utterances about life might...
September 23, 2021 at 03:53
Probably not poetry, but lyrical nonetheless and one of the most profound pieces I have ever read.
September 23, 2021 at 02:58
Sorry, I don't mean to be flippant or rude, but I don't understand your objection. What do you find problematic about the idea that, while we can't ha...
September 22, 2021 at 17:26
I don't think that's a charitable interpretation of my argument. I said a complete representation of a good life will forever remain a mystery. This d...
September 22, 2021 at 00:23
I don't know if that is the case. From my perspective, believing that one has a good life is a necessary, but not sufficient, component of having a go...
September 21, 2021 at 03:05
Nonsensical in what way?
September 20, 2021 at 20:04
That consequentialism can entail treating people as means rather than ends, and that this is absolutely valid in some situations, demonstrates the imp...
September 20, 2021 at 02:04
I think this would entail absurd conclusions. Firstly some degree of subjective satisfaction with ones' life does seem to be essential to having a goo...
September 20, 2021 at 01:46
What does it matter if most people would equate the good life with liking life, if we have good reasons to think that the good life is more than just ...
September 20, 2021 at 01:38
You could apply that skeptical regress to just about anything. That because I don't know absolutely 100% without-a-doubt that something is the case sh...
September 20, 2021 at 01:30
I guess they could utter that, but I would expect there to be various contradictions and absurdities in the proposition itself, if it were to be analy...
September 20, 2021 at 01:12
Another line of reasoning: 1. It is necessary but not sufficient to have a justified true belief that one has a good life in order to have a good life...
September 19, 2021 at 23:56
I have already read past the first book of the Transcendental Analytic, though the consolidation of my notes is lagging a bit. Transcendental Logic. F...
September 19, 2021 at 23:23
One of the better introductions I have read about philosophy of mind was written by E. J. Lowe. I really do not recommend you purchase any of these so...
September 18, 2021 at 01:52
The book is wild, loving it.
September 17, 2021 at 22:50
Neuromancer, William Gibson
September 16, 2021 at 03:56
@"schopenhauer1" any thoughts to add?
September 16, 2021 at 02:04
There are better presentations of the same ideas. Gary's funny sometimes in his lack of self-awareness, though. The actual arguments themselves are st...
September 16, 2021 at 01:59
It's pretty cringe, like any YouTube-based philosophy.
September 16, 2021 at 00:53
:up:
September 15, 2021 at 02:35
The ambiguity of what either one is, is part of the argument (points 2 & 3). We can say some things about what a good life is (that it is worth living...
September 14, 2021 at 02:26
I might add an additional premise: a bad life is whatever is not a good life; the set containing the attributes of a good life is finite, while the se...
September 14, 2021 at 00:16
And you are free to disagree with that premise, though I haven't a clue why you would.
September 13, 2021 at 23:57
I raised a similar point about this same issue here: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/11642/the-critique-of-pure-reason-discussion-and-readin...
September 12, 2021 at 23:35
THs do, apparently
September 12, 2021 at 07:17
Look, people have this habit of trying to fix things that they don't understand or have any good reason to be messing around with. There's this notion...
September 12, 2021 at 06:56
It's naive and arrogant.
September 12, 2021 at 06:37
I'm confused by your comment, not sure what it means.
September 11, 2021 at 17:14