You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

_db

Comments

I also do not wish to be seen as a close-minded bigot, but I suspect that if given the choice from the very start of life, most people would choose to...
November 28, 2016 at 23:30
What does pragmatism have to say about two competing theories of equal plausibility and appeal? You say you are a realist about an external world if I...
November 28, 2016 at 20:18
To put it another way, then, you can't criticize language without using language. You can't argue against argument without using argument. You can't f...
November 28, 2016 at 19:34
Just speaking from personal experience, I have to agree with . Not everything I do is from boredom. I often do things because I like to do them. I fin...
November 28, 2016 at 05:31
The hinge beliefs Wittgenstein primarily focused on were those required for reason itself. Skepticism and doubt are inherently rational. They depend u...
November 28, 2016 at 05:05
It still makes compressive waves in the air. Without a mind, though, no sound is made. In the same way your alarm clock beeps for a while before you w...
November 26, 2016 at 08:06
A Buddhist perspective on epistemology is that there are two types of "truth": ultimate and conventional. Conventional truths are made of ultimate tru...
November 24, 2016 at 21:34
Keeping Ourselves in the Dark by Colin Feltham Is Nature Ever Evil?: Religion, Science and Value by Willem B. Drees An Introduction to the Philosophy ...
November 24, 2016 at 21:09
Didn't Quine want to naturalize philosophy, and transform psychology into a sort of epistemology? In that knowledge would not be the only aspect of ep...
November 24, 2016 at 21:01
This is false. Wittgenstein disproved global skepticism by his analysis of hinge beliefs. Global skepticism is self-defeating. Skepticism in general i...
November 24, 2016 at 20:57
No, I don't think philosophers are trying too hard to sound smart. Philosophy is one of those things that you have to actually do yourself to understa...
November 24, 2016 at 06:25
Fuck off, then.
November 22, 2016 at 18:53
You seem to be contradicting yourself here. On one hand you claim that speciesism is ridiculous, but then claim that we ought to have a moral hierarch...
November 21, 2016 at 07:01
Yet how does reason begin if not from certain basic intuitions? (the external world exists, other people exist, I myself exist, x is a sound premise, ...
November 20, 2016 at 19:34
Indeed this seems to be a reasonable position, however it also seems to offer quite little in the way of prescriptive action. So we're left with a kin...
November 17, 2016 at 07:55
What the fuck is going on on this forum right now?! Seriously guys, get your shit together, it's a fucking internet forum.
November 16, 2016 at 05:29
Platinum rule is superior: treat others in the way they want to be treated. How you wish to be treated may not be equivalent to how someone else wishe...
November 15, 2016 at 15:30
I would personally argue that the most serious philosophical problem isn't whether or not we should cease our own consciousness, but whether or not we...
November 14, 2016 at 06:38
Well, he calls reasonable discussion (counterfactual analysis, phenomenological analysis, etc) "science". Which is really not that impressive of a def...
November 14, 2016 at 02:54
Of course, the command to us to go kill ourselves may be becoming more and more realistic, considering assisted suicide has been legalized in many sta...
November 13, 2016 at 23:16
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfryizBctss
November 13, 2016 at 19:21
"Why don't you just kill yourself?!" or "Stop being a lazy fuck!" I guess it depends on what ones' priorities are. If you're going for authenticity th...
November 13, 2016 at 18:03
I mean, I already presented some rough criticisms, like how he utilizes a vacuous definition of science, or begs the question with his consequentialis...
November 13, 2016 at 18:01
I should write a book.
November 13, 2016 at 03:33
lol, is that supposed to be an argument?
November 12, 2016 at 21:34
Yes, and he fails to provide anything useful to the debate. He begs the question by assuming consequentialism from the get-go and utilizes such a broa...
November 12, 2016 at 21:19
The sad thing is that Sam Harris (and co.) take this to the next level and publish entire books that are essentially just soap boxing.
November 12, 2016 at 21:13
LOL, I suppose you're right on that. But this all seems to be in the realm of communicating philosophy, not necessarily doing philosophy per se.
November 12, 2016 at 21:06
Should I have to read a book on homeopathy in order to rail against homeopathy?
November 12, 2016 at 21:03
Exactly. What is nice about philosophy though is that you don't have to have a LHC to understand the material. You just need some patience and bit of ...
November 12, 2016 at 20:56
Sheesh, you sound like the guys over at reddit. I'm not just accepting some guy's opinion based on nothing but authority. I already know some things a...
November 12, 2016 at 20:53
It's already been addressed ad nauseum by his reviewers, that's the point.
November 12, 2016 at 20:44
Indeed, and this is exactly what reviews of Sam Harris' books do.
November 12, 2016 at 20:19
Yes. I mean we still see this with rape victims. "You shouldn't have been out at night!"-like bullshit. Flow and in particular faith can justify the c...
November 12, 2016 at 19:34
No, the difference is that you can read reviewers that objectively quote the books and provide compelling reasons as to why the contents of the book a...
November 12, 2016 at 19:31
You need to realize that when we perceive anything, it's really just the reflection of photons traveling through a transparent gas or space.
November 12, 2016 at 06:01
I suspect it has something to do with liberalism being seen as naively optimistic. But we'll see what tgw has to say.
November 12, 2016 at 05:19
Stay tuned. If you want, you can read my warm-up posts on reddit. I don't wanna pull a muscle or anything.
November 12, 2016 at 05:10
I feel as though I should make a post with the sole intent of destroying new atheism, specifically Sam Harris. It will be gloriously savage.
November 12, 2016 at 05:06
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhILbGnpY-w
November 12, 2016 at 05:04
Because that's what it means to be see-through: photons are able to pass through the material.
November 12, 2016 at 04:54
The trouble with this idea is that, thanks to modern physics, we already know what makes things transparent. Depending on the grain pattern of a subst...
November 12, 2016 at 04:34
Of course. Do you think Sanders is done with politics now?
November 11, 2016 at 18:07
I mean, yes, I agree that the pessimistic perspective is helpful in toning down expectations and desires. That's fine. This is have an issue with. The...
November 11, 2016 at 16:38
Goddammit, why couldn't Bernie have won.
November 11, 2016 at 07:40
I always feel bad when I argue for pessimism, unless I have an desire to change people's actions for what I perceive to be the better (ethics). Like, ...
November 11, 2016 at 07:34
Please delete
November 10, 2016 at 04:24
Trump's speech was actually not too shabby. He still repeated himself a lot and asserted all these things that he'll never actually be able to do. But...
November 09, 2016 at 17:32
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHRNSeuvzlM
November 09, 2016 at 05:39
Honestly I think Trump doesn't even know what he's going to do when he's elected.
November 09, 2016 at 05:38