Yeah, you are. I'd like a clear run at the dialogue; your interjections detract from that for me. It seems I am not the only one who thinks so. By all...
We could try appealing to his better nature... @"Apollodorus"? Your objections having been duly noted, please allow the thread to continue without obt...
Of course. There is an obvious methodological error in I am not surprised to see this in Apollodorus, having observed a habit of first forming a concl...
An interesting wedge... I have long found the discussion of recollection unconvincing; but this shows how it might have seemed plausible to our Greek ...
You don't want to learn. It threatens your Christian values. https://www.livescience.com/48103-evolution-not-random.html https://www.newscientist.com/...
Sure; what can't be said, don't say. There's a muddle in the first sentence of the OP{ in that it suggests a supernatural explanation for "happenings"...
That's pure observation... The odd thing about the descriptions in science, in contrast to the title of this thread, is that it doesn't much care what...
...and I have a question, too. Presumably - I haven't checked - the word translated as "art" is "techne"? So immediately we are involved in the issue ...
Ah, here it is! Thank you, @"Fooloso4"; it would be remiss of us not to take advantage of having someone who knows what they are talking about to hand...
Waffle? So you thought I'd called you a cunt? How odd. Rest assured, if I had desired to call you a cunt, that's what I would have done. There's a cer...
Doing what is in your best interest is not the same as doing what is right. Serving yourself is not being moral. Doing what is in the best interest of...
No mistake. Ethical propositions state what one ought do. @"Seditious" still has to address the issue of what to do, with or without social coercion, ...
SO we might proceed by citing a paper or book on necropolitics and having a conversation about that particular item. That strikes me as preferable to ...
Perhaps we can look for a meeting point. I'm reading the chapter "They are both worse!", in which Žižek points out the third alternative in any dilemm...
Oh, sure. But that isn't the question in the OP - it's about reading as opposed to making shit up. Unless one need a university education now in order...
Take a look at Critical Race Theory, Whiteness, and Liberalism, in which @"ToothyMaw" admits not to have read much critical theory. https://thephiloso...
Call me a boomer if you like, but I sort of think that knowing a little bit about a topic is a not unreasonable prerequisite to entering into discussi...
Psss. The thread fades gently into the night, having achieved little. It's telling - and somewhat amusing - that the thread ends with a discussion of ...
What's most notable about the OP is the lack of almost any discussion of Critical Theory, racial or otherwise. The first paragraph sets out some unsup...
Perhaps the trouble is, it's too fucking nice here. We can do "She'll be right" and "No worries". We can afford to have a useless, corrupt, self-satis...
Comments