You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

Indeed.
September 10, 2021 at 06:38
Good to see you two have each other's company to enjoy. When you can be interesting, let me know.
September 10, 2021 at 06:14
Yeah, I'm always avoiding explaining Wittgenstein - over more than a dozen years and thousands of posts. Never mention him, that's me. Won't enter int...
September 10, 2021 at 05:55
Folk keep asking the questions that Wittgenstein answered, but refusing to read Wittgenstein. :roll:
September 10, 2021 at 02:14
Wittgenstein doesn't make use of essences; that's part of the point of rejecting meaning as stuff in people's heads, together with showing how what is...
September 10, 2021 at 02:13
How to talk to a science denier Not the best of interviews, but there are some cogent points here.
September 10, 2021 at 00:56
Did you read my discussion above with Cheshire?
September 10, 2021 at 00:09
Nuh. Have a read of Philosophical Investigations. Especially the first forty or so paragraphs.
September 09, 2021 at 23:54
But you implied meaning was a thing in your head. Immediately, the thing in your head is not the same as the thing in my head, and we do not have a sh...
September 09, 2021 at 23:09
Hm. let's see. Can you put something to use accidentally? Intent is built into an analysis of use. Indeed, there's a whole branch of work on the topic...
September 09, 2021 at 22:59
Seems as you are having difficulty following the plot. No worries. Keep thinking on it and come back when you are ready.
September 09, 2021 at 22:54
No, that's not at all what "meaning is use" is. Quiet the contrary, the meaning is found in the place of the words used in the language game being pla...
September 09, 2021 at 22:22
And what have you found out about her work? Is it her work with animal rights that is not useful? OR her work on global inequity? Or her feminism? Her...
September 09, 2021 at 22:00
Are you agreeing with Humpty or with me? You can't have both.
September 09, 2021 at 21:54
Indeed. Take a swatch of french grey out of the paint shop and into the sunshine, and it will be different. Which is the french grey you love? It does...
September 09, 2021 at 21:53
It wasn't a putdown so much as a request for clarification.
September 09, 2021 at 03:20
The metaphysics of poetry thread is leaking into the shoutbox. Or, more fashionably, Into the shoutbox from the metaphysics of poetry poor verse escap...
September 08, 2021 at 21:12
I've come back to your three long replies several times, trying to work out a suitable response. But I've just no clear idea of what your point is. Th...
September 08, 2021 at 21:04
...but no, you are choosing one use over another use; that being the effect it has on your friend.
September 08, 2021 at 07:08
Being certain is easy. Any fool can be certain. Demonstrating that your notion of French grey doesn't change - that'd be interesting. My point, exactl...
September 08, 2021 at 07:05
No, that's Wittgenspear. ...or was it Shakenstine?
September 08, 2021 at 06:24
ay, there's the rub: The meaning is the use.
September 08, 2021 at 06:18
...and then we ask Wittgenstein's question: How do you know that what you think of as french grey doesn't slowly change in your mind... so that what y...
September 08, 2021 at 06:10
I pretty much agree; as I said int he linked thread, "I love you more than words can say" doesn't say how much I love you, it shows it.
September 08, 2021 at 06:04
I hear Ozymandias was the Greek name for Ramesses II; hence this is the "shattered visage"... https://www.worldhistory.org/img/r/p/500x600/3033.jpg.we...
September 08, 2021 at 02:53
Is it what Aussies call "Duck-egg blue"? The point is that despite it being indescribable, there are descriptions. A bit like "I love you more than wo...
September 08, 2021 at 02:43
...and yet the thread has 18 replies already. Bitch to a Mod if you are unhappy. ...and yet it is "more green than grey..." A "a deep, grey, twilight ...
September 07, 2021 at 23:33
She would perhaps agree. None of that detracts from her work.
September 07, 2021 at 23:12
Sure. She uses that status to improve the world for others. I don't see as problem with that. Do you think cunning is a virtue? Do you strive to build...
September 07, 2021 at 22:38
Who, me? I don't. But I have helped folk to learn to swim.
September 07, 2021 at 22:37
I think I've answered that: one is obliged to choose. The measure of a human is what they choose. Deontologists tend to pretend that there is a rule, ...
September 07, 2021 at 22:36
Deontology makes the mistake of thinking that there is a rule to which everyone must agree - usually on pain of being thought irrational - and that th...
September 07, 2021 at 22:17
In an iterative process, it won't matter where you start, the process will lead you in the right direction. You sound like a broken record. Who choose...
September 07, 2021 at 21:59
A quick trip home to see the kids in Sydney. Then back to Canberra for work. The rules do not apply to him. They are for other people. Why not bring y...
September 07, 2021 at 21:40
Dunno. The OP seems to have been sufficient to create a viable thread. The world is all that is the case. What is the case can be stated.
September 07, 2021 at 21:35
I'm thinking you'll see the benefits in the capabilities approach to virtue ethics, since your roll is the improvement for those in your charge - as i...
September 07, 2021 at 21:23
You will not see what is going on here unless you grasp the relevance of direction of fit. ...really? See how you demand a base? There's the problem. ...
September 07, 2021 at 21:21
See my comments regarding direction of fit, immediately above. Expecting a universal law here is a mistake. One chooses to improve some aspects and no...
September 07, 2021 at 21:06
There's something fundamental about ethics that needs attention here. Direction of fit. When you sat that the cat is on the mat, you seek to modify yo...
September 07, 2021 at 21:00
Yeah it does. See Nusbaum for my preferred list. If your point is that the list is not agreed on universally, then sure; you have to choose.
September 07, 2021 at 20:54
No, it's what I say it is. That follows directly from
September 07, 2021 at 20:51
What? No, forget it. I doubt it worth the effort to understand this non sequitur.
September 07, 2021 at 01:08
Oh, fuckety fuck, fuck off. I'm Australian. SO fucking get your fucking mind around the fucking fact that we fucking use that fucking word in every fu...
September 07, 2021 at 00:11
That's a very crude analysis. Not all naked women are fuck-worthy; and no all naked women want to get fucked by you. You talk as if she had no say in ...
September 06, 2021 at 21:50
You can't; because existence is a secondary predicate. That's the short answer. Of course there are complications folk can introduce, such as a first-...
September 06, 2021 at 01:56
:rofl: Righto - I'll leave you to it then.
September 06, 2021 at 01:38
Indeed, it does. But then: ...so you didn't learn the lesson - you are still talking about it. I have nothing in my pocket. You think I can take it ou...
September 05, 2021 at 23:28
OK. So... ...an expert with an opinion... ...so being an expert his evidence is very low grade. Ok, so you are arguing that we not trust Popper. Cool....
September 05, 2021 at 12:06
No, were are back at illformed; it's not false, it doesn't say anything. So the same goes for any deductions that one attempts to derive from it. Than...
September 05, 2021 at 10:36