The Matrix Trilogy. Smart?
I think in general the first Matrix movie was well received and largely understood. But in general I would say the sequel films were not as well appreciated. I was told by a coworker at the time that they were simply doing a Christ/Antichrist dynamic and otherwise the sequels weren't that clever. I've heard it said the sequels were much smarter than the original and simply way ahead of their time. In the light of a 4th film and nearly 20 years since the last one, were the 2nd and 3rd films that smart?
Comments (13)
Money, it seems, can bring people back to life. :lol:
:rofl: For once I agree.
I loved the first. I could pick holes in it now, but it was just pure entertainment during that first view (almost alone in the theatre for a matinee, with blaring speakers.) The following two were just weak, though the action scenes were still state of the art (from what I remember.)
More like “Matrix Exhumed.”
I really wouldn't know, I fell asleep soon after the beginning.
I just assumed since the movies address reality itself and how the mind can be fooled that it was a philosophical topic. I am not asking about esthetics of the films.