You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Streetlight

Comments

What specifically makes it anti-realist or idealist though? Like, you're missing a step. 1. Meaning and truth of statements like "the chair exists" is...
November 22, 2015 at 12:59
I'm not sure I follow. Why would it imply that?
November 22, 2015 at 12:36
But once you cash language out as a kind of significant behavior - as an action - it's no less puzzling than how me pointing to a chair 'refers' to a ...
November 22, 2015 at 00:36
Interesting you say that because the traditions that I draw these ideas from are almost exactly these two quarters: 'postmodernism' and Wittgensteinia...
November 21, 2015 at 06:26
Less as rhetoric than as incantation: "To make metaphysics out of spoken language is to make language convey what it does not normally convey. That is...
November 21, 2015 at 05:11
Would it not be better to say that the difference between language and reality is a difference that insinuates itself as reality? The way to cash this...
November 21, 2015 at 03:55
I think one needs to be careful with language here - I don't want to say that language is 'derived' from a more general set of behaviors so much as I ...
November 21, 2015 at 03:13
Not in the slightest. Constraints are always enabling constraints: their valence is entirely positive to the degree that 'restrictions' on the free pl...
November 21, 2015 at 02:04
Ooo, that Foot article (which I voted for), reminds me of another that might make for good reading the month after: G. E. M. Anscombe's Modern Moral P...
November 21, 2015 at 01:24
That's fair enough PB. I guess I didn't name any explicit targets because A) I'm trying to aim at broader tendencies and attitudes in philosophy than ...
November 20, 2015 at 12:56
Great quote. And I hasten to say that I don't disagree - if anything, these sorts of studies underline just the point of the OP: that the use of langu...
November 19, 2015 at 04:51
Francois Zourabichvili - Deleuze: A Philosophy of the Event & The Vocabulary of Deleuze
November 16, 2015 at 05:01
Yay, an @"Andrewk"!
November 15, 2015 at 03:29
Eh, I'll try and speak in the idiom of those I'm conversing with for convenience sake. If I were to be honest, realism - of any kind - is not somethin...
November 14, 2015 at 11:34
Trust you to ask the hard questions @"Aaron R"! Anyway, I'm not entirely averse to rethinking representation, and if I come off as being so, it's more...
November 14, 2015 at 02:50
This makes sense to me, both from a phenomenological perspective - Baggs writes alot about overload on her blog - and in terms of the language of cons...
November 13, 2015 at 12:42
Yes, but meaning is the parameter of distinction here; with respect to meaning, can we draw any metaphysically significant division? The argument says...
November 12, 2015 at 17:26
Actually @"Michael", @"Aaron R" is on point here, which is that once you include 'non-linguistic components' within the ambit of the linguistic, any h...
November 12, 2015 at 17:00
Content, content, content. Just fill this motherfucker up with content.
November 12, 2015 at 15:12
There's not much sense in talking about 'realism' or 'anti-realism' as abstract categories. One needs to speak about these things with respect to some...
November 12, 2015 at 15:11
It's precisely this nexus or interface, as you call it, that fascinates me so much. Once meaning becomes unmoored from language, you open yourself up ...
November 12, 2015 at 15:07
Surely you can give me more to chew on than this?
November 11, 2015 at 23:41
@"Baden" - Yeah, I think that is perhaps what I find stale, or at least artificial about some analytic approaches to language; it's treated as a sort ...
November 11, 2015 at 23:40
"Cuban" goes for 3! - and does not end up at "philosophy".
November 11, 2015 at 13:56
Oops, didn't read the rules. 13 it is!
November 11, 2015 at 13:25
Takes 4 for goat. This is clearly significant.
November 11, 2015 at 12:01
There is nothing intrinsically wrong with 'partial theories', and the onus is on you to show that language functions univocally if you want to make th...
November 10, 2015 at 14:33
A word on what I like about the whole Davidsonian approach to language, although it's not specific to this paper as such (hopefully it might throw som...
November 10, 2015 at 13:45
Right, gonna reel some thoughts off in order to work them out in the process of writing. It seems to me that the thrust of Davidson's paper is somethi...
November 06, 2015 at 06:02
Oh don't get me wrong John - my point is that it's precisely because VR or video games are never 'purely' video games, because the 'space' involved wh...
November 04, 2015 at 11:40
With respect to video games, I actually agree with TGW here, but not necessarily for reasons he might appreciate. I think that it is indeed disingenuo...
November 04, 2015 at 04:16
Sounds good to me! I think you're entirely right to say the the LEM in Simondon is not false per se, but simply inapplicable, or rather only applies e...
November 03, 2015 at 23:15
Erin Manning - Relationscapes: Movement, Art, Philosophy Erin Manning - Always More Than One: Individuation's Dance
November 02, 2015 at 22:31
Sure.
November 02, 2015 at 21:49
A lovely article, Jamal, one in keeping with my own sensibilities. I think one thing to keep in mind re: the pervasiveness of the argument is that it'...
November 02, 2015 at 06:41
Aw, I'm going to miss my brief stint with the banhammer. In any case, it's simply best not to go about mentioning this place on PF anymore, not even i...
October 30, 2015 at 15:28
Quine is always fun to read, and his "Two Dogmas of Empiricism" and "On What Is" have alot to be discussed in them. Otherwise, some other, more left o...
October 30, 2015 at 05:17
I think I understand what you're trying to say, and I think it's been something I've been grappling with in my own musings. I think one answer to what...
October 29, 2015 at 00:37
@"Jamalrob": I think you're right that what's interesting about the paper is that while it ultimately ends up laying the groundwork to undermine the f...
October 28, 2015 at 14:12
I thought section four lacked a bit of rigor; you should have cited the studies done by Chicken (1984) and Chicken (2003) to substantiate your thesis ...
October 28, 2015 at 11:48
I think this question, right here, is perhaps the philosophical question par excellence for our age. Ever since the post-structuralist onslaught again...
October 28, 2015 at 07:06
I'm more or less in agreement that the idea of moral principles (understood in terms of 'rules') are exactly the wrong way to go about thinking morali...
October 27, 2015 at 15:08
@"jamalrob": that's an excellent quote actually. I've been struggling over trying to frame the idea that memory is created in real time - while still ...
October 27, 2015 at 02:37
Woah, end of en era indeed. I'm going to stay on for a bit to clean up spam and so on, but I've lessened my contributions to the forum for a while eve...
October 26, 2015 at 14:48
Thoughts on rereading the paper: It strikes me that the paper is somewhat incongruously named with respect to the actual analysis that takes place in ...
October 26, 2015 at 14:39
@"fdrake": Yes absolutely is it a question of the the very conditions of affordances. What's important here is that this ties perception right back in...
October 25, 2015 at 01:40
Yeah this is a good point actually - a need to be careful with language. To thematise it though, Morris for instance frames the geometrical field as a...
October 25, 2015 at 01:15
This seems to be on the right track, and I'd suggest that what ties the sorts of things you've listed together is the 'mark' that they've left on the ...
October 24, 2015 at 15:22
Here's how Morris explains the Muller-Lyer illusion: "The line segments are welded into arrow structures the visual expanse of which bulges outward or...
October 24, 2015 at 14:57
To take up an old saying of Leibniz, the OP is right in what it denies, but wrong in what it affirms. I think it's more or less uncontroversial that t...
October 24, 2015 at 08:52