I thought section four lacked a bit of rigor; you should have cited the studies done by Chicken (1984) and Chicken (2003) to substantiate your thesis a little more. It's a fine paper to let roost among your achievements otherwise.
Is it actually possible that I now have a better understanding of hens? :s
But the presentation is so sad and the graphs need some clarity. Why didn't they put it into a PowerPoint Show?
Pierre-NormandOctober 29, 2015 at 00:43#16341 likes
The paper is a bit repetitive but contains many nuggets of wisdom nonetheless.
unenlightenedOctober 29, 2015 at 01:18#16401 likes
With such a small sample size, I would say that even 95% is hardly conclusive. If you can get the funding on the basis of this, I suggest an eggsaustive field study would settle the matter.
I went to a talk the other day about Social Choice Theory that used the identical graph to your p. 19. For some reason the guy presenting it didn't mention chickens once, though. Probably so no one would spot the plagiarism.
Comments (12)
Meow!
GREG
But the presentation is so sad and the graphs need some clarity. Why didn't they put it into a PowerPoint Show?