You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Jamal

Comments

Excuse me for butting in. That passage does not to me show what you think it shows. At most it shows he condemns thinking when it's a complacent or do...
July 29, 2025 at 19:09
One thing I particularly liked was the idea that the history of analytic philosophy recapitulates what happens in Hume’s Treatise: from deference to s...
July 29, 2025 at 18:54
I think hermeneutics began among the bible bashers interpreters, and Gadamer is a relative, and relatively secular, latecomer. Aside from his philosop...
July 29, 2025 at 18:36
Like so many podcasts it's messy and rambling, but it's very interesting and I'm tempted to read the book, A Social History of Analytic Philosophy, wh...
July 29, 2025 at 13:48
This looks right to me. :up: A strong statement of the problem, but I think this bit is wrong: 'Relations between objects "affinity" is something cate...
July 29, 2025 at 11:51
Introduction: Idealism as Rage I'm backtracking here. Reading the following from J. M. Bernstein in the Blackwell Companion to Adorno made me realize ...
July 29, 2025 at 11:19
Introduction: Argument and Experience (i) A hell of a passage, ultra-compressed and dialectical. Adorno is criticizing Hegelian dialectics but at the ...
July 28, 2025 at 19:08
Others are welcome to go over the system sections in more detail, but since we discussed the stuff about system quite a lot when reading the lectures,...
July 28, 2025 at 09:52
No doubt you're confused because your circadian rhythm is disrupted by living in the wrong timezone.
July 28, 2025 at 05:44
The horarium was originally based on rough, flexible divisions, stemming from Roman timekeeping, which had variable hours. Certainly, clock time came ...
July 28, 2025 at 05:35
Clock time was invented to coordinate exploitation.
July 28, 2025 at 03:34
@"Moliere" I feel like I might want to read his Aesthetic Theory after ND. Since it was written after ND, it might actually be a conscious application...
July 27, 2025 at 16:34
That's an interesting point that I will ponder.
July 27, 2025 at 12:03
Again, ND is in a sense doing just that, since the idea of immanent critique is to confront ideological concepts on their own terms and push them to b...
July 27, 2025 at 11:40
Yes, because ND itself tries to see the world without the distortions of ideology (he notes the importance of the appearance/reality discinction). Eve...
July 27, 2025 at 11:28
Since we are not reading the original, I take it you think my recent post about how Adorno performs the content of his philosophy in the form of his w...
July 27, 2025 at 09:58
Things like this belong in the Lounge, so put it there yourself next time please.
July 27, 2025 at 07:22
:up:
July 25, 2025 at 23:40
This does not even begin to address or even acknowledge my points. But some of us think you're thinking about it wrong.
July 25, 2025 at 23:35
https://youtu.be/U2ALPRaRhn0?si=T1xdaoiE4J6tj1Ak
July 25, 2025 at 23:10
At age 11, this was probably the second album I ever owned. https://youtu.be/daeqb6f7GrY?si=0P2OLZzIQxfREahs
July 25, 2025 at 23:00
https://youtu.be/5bIeYqpn0Gk?si=osXgJJ-lRSCXhdP6
July 25, 2025 at 22:31
@"hypericin" You've contrasted pragmatic function with usefulness. But when Oscar Wilde said that "all art is quite useless"—and I believe @"Moliere" ...
July 25, 2025 at 09:17
I'd probably be interested in Baudrillard's criticism of genealogy but I don't understand it from what you've quoted or from the interview it's taken ...
July 24, 2025 at 12:41
It should be a new discussion. It doesn't belong in this one.
July 24, 2025 at 04:44
I agree, but tell that to the bat mass-murderer @"Mikie".
July 23, 2025 at 20:03
Today I was reading Revolutionary Spring: Fighting for a New World 1848–1849 by Christopher Clark. It describes some of the counter-revolutionary acts...
July 23, 2025 at 19:58
In the "Relation to System" section there's a remarkable passage that charts the rise of the philosophical system and accounts for this in starkly Mar...
July 23, 2025 at 19:26
Very interesting post, MU, I like it. I think your interpretative scheme of death/religion, profound/profane, sacrosanct/blasphemy, is inventive and e...
July 23, 2025 at 07:18
Yep.
July 22, 2025 at 16:37
So how does this play out in the text? Take the following sentence as an example. The thing to notice is how compressed it is. It awkwardly crams in t...
July 22, 2025 at 16:05
Maybe something like this. Darstellung or the moment of expression is the deliberate interpretation of the given facts, whereas Vorstellung, the repre...
July 22, 2025 at 14:46
Exactly. And the sentence I've bolded hits the nail on the head. Adorno's version of speculative thought is only negative; it doesn't offer a positive...
July 22, 2025 at 07:51
Introduction: Speculative Moment This section is about speculation and depth, covered mainly in lecture 9. There's something I missed in my post about...
July 22, 2025 at 07:18
Modernity and the Holocaust by Zygmunt Bauman. I've been meaning to read Bauman for years, and I happened upon this one, which happens to work very we...
July 21, 2025 at 17:54
I’ll just respond in a rather arcane and non-topical fashion to this particular point, without addressing the main question. Some of the most influent...
July 21, 2025 at 09:36
Interesting! It's definitely thingly, since he uses it again later on in the book, where it's helpfully accompanied by the German: A.I. gives me the f...
July 18, 2025 at 09:19
Before I say something about the "Speculative Moment" section, I'll just pick up on something in the previous section. The last sentence expresses an ...
July 18, 2025 at 08:14
:brow:
July 15, 2025 at 10:28
@"Moliere" I intend to respond in a few days. Just so you know I’m not ignoring you.
July 11, 2025 at 16:15
Fair enough. From my standpoint it's laughter without clarification. Clarification is to philosophy as explaining a joke is to humour.
July 10, 2025 at 20:50
Sheesh
July 10, 2025 at 20:25
Like these?
July 10, 2025 at 20:25
You're a slippery customer. But there's no argument in your post for this. It's clear to me that the meaning you find internally (talking to yourself)...
July 10, 2025 at 20:14
I believe you now. But who or what is doing this? I mean, aside from TC. The rejection of metaphysics is important to a lot of modern philosophy, star...
July 10, 2025 at 19:21
What are you referring to here? Who or what do you think is guilty of this? Why do you think so? Are you trying hard to be cryptic, because it’s appro...
July 10, 2025 at 17:47
Which area? I thought it was about knowledge in general.
July 10, 2025 at 17:01
No. Adorno saw suffering, and considered the need give voice to suffering to be the motivation of philosophy properly so-called. Thus, from feeling an...
July 10, 2025 at 15:02
I'm inclined to say that knowledge is about the interpretation of facts. To know is to be able to understand the facts, which is about context and rel...
July 10, 2025 at 09:38
That looks like a basic justification for esotericism, mysticism, or religion: since the truth cannot be reached rationally/conceptually, we have to o...
July 09, 2025 at 22:04