You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Deleteduserrc

Comments

edited out, post was too extra.
July 20, 2019 at 05:07
In: Bannings  — view comment
:grimace:
July 20, 2019 at 04:36
In: Bannings  — view comment
personality disorders. intense emotions, unstable sense of self. I have at least one toe dipped in myself.
July 20, 2019 at 04:28
OP makes sense to me. It feels right, looking back on my own memories growing up and also watching kids grow up into the world. It seems like a certai...
July 20, 2019 at 04:23
In: Bannings  — view comment
I have some theories as an amateur DSM reader. Something cluster B. I hope he finds a soft place to land.
July 20, 2019 at 04:17
In: Bannings  — view comment
I got the sense he was a deeply-damaged guy who was picking up the pieces.I didn't like his posts, but I was morbidly fascinated by his presence. It s...
July 20, 2019 at 04:02
get out of here zombie librarian number one trauma guy
July 12, 2019 at 05:09
addendum: the real-as-trauma model renamed 'wires' by phillip larkin The widest prairies have electric fences, For though old cattle know they must no...
July 11, 2019 at 22:55
My thought, against Lacan (who I'm annoyed with, because he set up shop in my head for a long time, starting in my late teens) is that trauma is two-p...
July 11, 2019 at 22:49
I've had a very similar experience, recently, in my case involving drinking after work to 'wind down.' Just as you say - I had a shift from commuting ...
July 11, 2019 at 22:26
But maybe, pace Bataille, having sex near your mother's corpse while wearing a mitre isn't a necessary prerequisite for rolling in the flowers. Even i...
July 10, 2019 at 22:45
that's a soberer way to put it, but yes.What's important tho is that the world is our games and something else as well.
July 06, 2019 at 02:20
But also the obscure source that can disrupt the game, even when we're playing in way that has always before been right.
July 06, 2019 at 01:51
Or make that Beijing, continued Sally coquettishly. I'm being earnest! Bob said earnestly. Ok, so let's say conceptual or language games take place wi...
July 06, 2019 at 00:42
It's clear in that case, but above we were reducing the information-transfer aspect of language by focusing on the game-like nature of actual fact-exc...
July 06, 2019 at 00:25
The rainbow metaphor is Schop. I'm saying he had recourse to the fluctuating emotional states of his readers when he deployed it. It works, its a good...
July 04, 2019 at 01:12
Snarkily : there are ways of looking at one's life that aren't centered, like room service, around how comfortable you are. Use it the wrong way and @...
July 03, 2019 at 23:22
Another way at this. (1)Replace 'conceptual schemes' with 'conceptual games' - various ways of knowing-how, rather than knowing-that. (2)Retain Davids...
July 03, 2019 at 22:56
Only laboring the point because I think you're right to offer a corrective to the idea of language as information transfer. But if it isnt also inform...
July 03, 2019 at 21:32
I mostly agree, and was hinting at something similar in my paragraph about the historian vs the studying-to-test-well student (tbf it was an edit so m...
July 03, 2019 at 21:30
Right but this transcendental root of suffering, if you like, says that there are guaranteed to be minus strokes. What makes these minus strokes minus...
July 03, 2019 at 21:22
That's a possible thing, but it's neither nor here nor there, since I'm not talking about a situation like that, but about people learning what date a...
July 03, 2019 at 20:37
But, with the structural perspective, you still have minus-strokes. Only now you have a conceptual apparatus that allows you to see them as contingent...
July 02, 2019 at 01:13
Perhaps, yeah. The correct title would be 'not *all of language* is moving information.' @"StreetlightX" already solved the problem in a very short po...
July 02, 2019 at 00:47
Not necessarily. I mean that if you're doing away with 'moving information from one head to another' then, though you've improved our understanding of...
July 01, 2019 at 22:30
@"Banno" Doesn't making language about what we do in this way leave us vulnerable to the maundering, marauding post-truth postmodernists? Is there no ...
July 01, 2019 at 01:06
I think I'm on the same page as both @"Baden" & @"fdrake". I liked the gills/cruise ship metaphor. I think its right to focus on its function rather t...
July 01, 2019 at 00:37
@"Wallows" OP is veering toward r/iamverysmart territory. It's good to acknowledge strengths, including intellect - but be wary of fetishizing any att...
June 30, 2019 at 17:01
Like Duchamp's fountain and all the stuff the came after, esp conceptual art. Art that's less about the artwork itself than how it makes you think abo...
June 28, 2019 at 19:39
Sometimes, too, art is just about the act of creation itself, and its effects on the audience/viewer are of secondary concern. Think of playing with t...
June 26, 2019 at 21:38
You gotta do you. I certainly didn't intend to try to pull you away from something personally meaningful, something which draws you toward it. I respe...
June 25, 2019 at 07:03
Alright, got you. (By the way, my first, gut, reaction to your prose was that it sounded a little like legalese, rather than any particular author.) I...
June 25, 2019 at 06:30
if I read you correctly, you're objecting to the charge of imitating past authors with the defense that you simply favor a similar prose style. Bolste...
June 25, 2019 at 05:31
Right, but what are you saying to me? ( I'm pretty sure I understand now what you're saying but --) Just say it! It's ok if it's simple in plain langu...
June 25, 2019 at 05:00
recap of last post: ---The recognition of simply being fake is based on a falsehood, and so has uncertain worth. To make sure that one seems different...
June 25, 2019 at 04:33
The flower is a good one but is imitating other, older flowers, and it distracts. makes some ppl think its a false flower when its not.
June 25, 2019 at 04:08
tldr: youre clearly smart, but everyone seems smarter when theyre themselves. thats what draws people in.
June 25, 2019 at 04:07
ha, closer! But for real just imagine you're talking to your friends, or even yourself, and no one cares (no one does, alas) and just say what you wan...
June 25, 2019 at 04:01
Caveat: don't get tricked into thinking occasional vulgarity safeguards the real shit. Don't oscillate - integrate!
June 25, 2019 at 03:53
:cool: theres the real ontological requisite
June 25, 2019 at 03:49
@"Vessuvius" I like polished classical prose as much as the next guy, but it seems like the prose style you favor is cramping you here. As others have...
June 25, 2019 at 02:37
@"Wallows" Sorry you're going through that. I've been there a few times, it sucks. I think fdrake has the right approach, in terms of looking at what ...
June 24, 2019 at 23:44
Yeah, I think that's a fair analysis. It seems like both? If I read you right, do you mean a larger participation in an existing set of privileges?
June 11, 2019 at 02:40
I'll admit I don't know much about the history of Eugenics (or the period from 1870-1920 in general.) But... the pharaoh let Moses and his people go a...
June 11, 2019 at 02:16
That sounds right. If your post is supposed to be a standalone exercise in standalone ethical questions, then I'm out of line. I'll leave you to the s...
June 09, 2019 at 04:52
I've been having a philosophical conversation with you. But it seems like nothing registers as 'philosophical' until that person either agrees with yo...
June 09, 2019 at 04:25
To play devil's advocate, Roman society rewarded - and cultivated - ambition and determination. Rewarded it with wealth and power. And it worked! for ...
June 09, 2019 at 02:17
No worries at all, I'm usually having a mood myself. My feeling is that, you're right, social darwinism and freudianism have a lot of mechanistic qual...
June 09, 2019 at 01:11
Ok
June 06, 2019 at 01:34