Rorty also states: It may be that what Hacking calls the death of meaning at the hands of Quine, Wittgenstein, Davidson and Feyerabend brings with it ...
This is somewhat iffy. Because if one states the above, the implicit assumption is that somewhere meaning arises, as if through the conversation with ...
So, the method of analysis in philosophy otherwise known as the 'linguistic turn', has dismissed 'representation' as a form of meaning. What else woul...
I disagree, most of what pragmatists wanted to accomplish has been already accomplished by linguistic philosophers, or it was some sort of natural ten...
That really couldn't really be answered, instead of this one, Banno. Like, who's going to verify such a statement that the linguistic turn is indeed d...
This gives me a mental-cramp and creates a ill feeling. Namely, reading this as if it were definitional based, one can claim that this is closer to pr...
I'm operating from the counterfactual, that linguistic philosophy was not treated as the mainstay, and instead analytic philosophy had its mainstay mu...
Well, my knowledge doesn't seem to be a deterrent for some kind of discussion. All that I have concluded now is that there's no determined method to q...
What kind of truth about this whole issue do you think this has in common with category theory or perhaps this is sort of some kind of new logic at pl...
Or maybe the act of inquiry and arising insights to sound more pragmatist? A lot of people are baffled by this topic for some reason, where I see this...
Totally. It's no mistake nowadays that analytic philosophy has proffered from logical positivism and figures such as Quine and Carnap as well as Schli...
Congruent? It's a travesty that logical positivism got shat on and Cambridge wanted to go for common sense philosophy, whilst America steadfast follow...
Not really, as nothing profound has actually changed in the field of philosophy. Go ahead and read the afternotes of Rorty's The Linguistic Turn. Meta...
I posted this in another thread about logical positivism/atomism/monism being, quite possibly, a precursor to formal languages like programming langua...
But, but, we're all using the internets, and the computer positivists are smiling in their graves with all this formalism in language with Grammarly! ...
I was expecting something like: Mathematics is deterministic, and yet, this situation arises. Maybe some stuff in maths can get organized better with ...
Where a unit of a good is defined much more precisely in digital goods, and the brand of a product doesn't influence the quality factor of the good, t...
I seem to have run into issues with describing the part about complexity due to the fact that there's no (extra)-systematic way of formalizing mathema...
Geometry, mainly. I think it is better understood in number theory for example. Is every theorem able to provide for a proof that is least or more com...
It's a pitiful psychology to find a niche in terms of dangly parts instead of something so much more complex and sophisticated as a computer. Be it as...
Isn't it humiliating to think a computer is superior to you in every single regard? As much as you'd like to pitifully think you are better or greater...
Seemingly, an example cannot be provided since, I think, it cannot ever be determined if it really is conscious or even sentient according to the info...
Comments