This is not true on a plurality of levels... The solipsist argument is false for it is impossible to arrive at such a complex high level of abstract t...
One can say something as many times as one likes. That doesn't make it true. It does make it 'maintained'... You have no idea what you're talking abou...
You're either avoiding the valid objection, or you don't understand it. I'll grant sincerity. You don't understand it. Of course I've provided you exa...
What you've called "philosophical" I would call "radical". It is borne of failing to draw the distinction between thought and belief and thinking abou...
Reason requires a baseline from which to reason. The baseline consists of language use which talks about the world and/or ourselves. Reason requires l...
Yes. Thinking doesn't have a definitive spatiotemporal location. It owes it's existence to a plethora of simpler things. One is physiological sensory ...
:yikes: No... and then explain why the correct answer is "yes"... So, you admit that thoughts and ideas are not existentially dependent upon physiolog...
Using a belief statement as a premiss requires metacognition. Metacognition includes thinking about one's own thought and belief. Knowing what "the cu...
One can know that the statement "there is a cup on the table" is true by virtue of knowing what the statement is talking about, and then looking to se...
So, if an average 8 year old child is asked if "there is a cup on the table" is true and s/he answers "yes" while pointing at the cup, you're saying t...
Surely everyone knows that self-satisfaction plays no crucial role in being justified... This lets me know what Moore and I have always had in common ...
Hey Marchesk... One could deny any one of the premisses, I would think. Common sense prevails to me... A correlation requires a plurality of things. A...
So... On what ground would one base such a condition for knowledge? Why must all knowledge claims(I'm assuming empirical claims) be able to be doubted...
Yeah. Sorry, I was more hesitant than was warranted. I wasn't certain about the accuracy of my recollection. It's been a while since I seriously read ...
I'm a strict determinist... :wink: You're right though. There are more than one legitimate relation between the brain state and groups of similar acti...
Yeah. My apologies... We agree here. I've no problem with Kant's Noumena, as I understand it to be... a negative limit on our thoughts, and that's it!...
So Sam... With Witt's strict application of the phrase "I know", aren't there things that we can surmise about his thoughts on the matter that perhaps...
I wholeheartedly agree with this... Here though, you take the equally extreme other end... The world is not entirely outside of ourselves that we expe...
I love ya Jeep... I agree that it remains a thorny problem. On my view, much of the problem is/was the result of poor conception. The objective/subjec...
Yeah, you're probably right. I mean I wouldn't argue against that. It wasn't the best supportive reasoning... I was more applying the consequences of ...
Yeah, I've heard that argument in different forms before as well. Nagel is pretty good. I'll have to have a look at that. Thanks. However, here's what...
Focusing on the author... is not necessarily an ad hom. This is true. It is also true that you have not focused upon the author as a means for objecti...
A child amidst language acquisition doesn't need to accept any premiss such as "auditory input is reliable" in order to know that that thing over ther...
No. This is confused. One can know that the statement "there is a cup on the table" is true by virtue of looking. There is no need for one to refer to...
I've heard this before. We've discussed this before as well. My viewpoint hasn't changed much regarding it. Why would we need to step outside our mind...
You're just jealous of the size and scope of this novelty... It is quite problematic for you. Your posts are beginning to degrade into nothing but rhe...
Does understanding how to use the English language count as referring to another premiss? All premisses are statements. Some statements are true. Some...
You asserted that physiological sensory perception isn't necessary for drawing correlations or meaning. Now you claim that thoughts and ideas are conn...
Comments