You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

creativesoul

Comments

QM interpretations are fodder.
October 10, 2018 at 02:16
Doesn't the argument set that out? :wink:
October 10, 2018 at 01:51
It does not follow from the fact that we cannot definitively know the causal sequence of events that there is no causal sequence of events.
October 10, 2018 at 01:48
This argument presupposes an external world in p4, or at least it could be argued that it does. So... It's interesting to me on several different leve...
October 10, 2018 at 01:39
Well, not quite actually... Although my position - and this argument - situates the presupposition of correspondence within thought and belief formati...
October 10, 2018 at 01:34
Well, actually yeah to some extent. However, there's still much work to be done in terms of setting out the content of correlations. Progress is comin...
October 10, 2018 at 01:33
I was going to show the inherent inadequacy of "arbitrary" when defined as you have, but it's no matter now. Banno wants the thread back on track. I'l...
October 10, 2018 at 01:29
Nothing wrong with that.
October 09, 2018 at 05:51
God got in Kant's way... Heiddy got in his own way... Neither had a good grasp upon human thought and belief.
October 09, 2018 at 04:22
Doesn't seem very arbitrary to me. Clearly there are different accepted usages for the term "arbitrary", and not all place adequate value upon our own...
October 09, 2018 at 03:56
Thanks. And a worldview(a collection of one's own thought and belief about themselves and the world)?
October 09, 2018 at 02:52
I would be more than willing to offer a separate argument/reasoning for all of the premisses(1,2,4,6,9)...
October 09, 2018 at 02:32
I'm just curious... you and litewave are talking about a subject that underwrote our discussion as well... What's the difference between arbitrary and...
October 09, 2018 at 01:47
What are the contents of this purported correlation? What things are being connected, correlated, and/or associated with each other? Do you have an ex...
October 09, 2018 at 01:40
Knowledge of the changes in behaviour after introducing the bell. Knowledge of the physiological make-up of the animal. Knowledge of what the attribut...
October 08, 2018 at 05:56
That question has been answered more than once.
October 08, 2018 at 05:21
Do you have an example of meaning that does not consist of a plurality of different things and a creature capable of drawing correlations, connections...
October 08, 2018 at 04:49
And I'm accused of anthropomorphism?
October 08, 2018 at 04:44
Outstretched leaves of the rainforest undergrowth and sunlight.
October 08, 2018 at 04:44
Some thing eliciting a response from a creature does not equate to that thing being meaningful to the creature. Venus Flytrap and an insect on it's in...
October 08, 2018 at 04:42
Unpack this... What is "it" referring to...
October 08, 2018 at 04:38
...
October 08, 2018 at 04:36
How does it become so?
October 08, 2018 at 04:35
Oh good! We agree then? The sound of the bell is meaningful/significant to the dog?
October 08, 2018 at 04:33
Involuntary salivation and heading towards the food bowl is more than adequate evidence that the bell is meaningful/significant to the dog. What's the...
October 08, 2018 at 04:30
Are you actually denying that the sound of the bell is meaningful/significant to Pavlov's dog?
October 08, 2018 at 04:19
This coming from someone who has yet to have offered a valid refutation to the argument on any level.
October 08, 2018 at 04:11
Pots and kettles...
October 08, 2018 at 04:07
Your rhetoric is boring. What counts as "superfluous and anthropocentric"?
October 08, 2018 at 04:06
By knowing what all examples of meaning are existentially dependent upon(what they all consist of) and the subsequent judicious application of that kn...
October 08, 2018 at 03:34
I can see the conversation getting too loose... Before long we will need to draw and maintain the distinction between some and all...
October 08, 2018 at 03:07
This presupposes that a creature can draw correlations, connections, and/or associations between things that have yet to have been perceived, sensed, ...
October 08, 2018 at 02:57
Sure. Glad you asked. Do you have an example of meaning that does not consist of a plurality of different things and a creature capable of drawing cor...
October 08, 2018 at 02:47
All meaning is attributed. All attribution of meaning requires a plurality of things and a creature capable of drawing a correlation, connection, and/...
October 08, 2018 at 02:03
Yes, sensation is part of meaningful experience. No. In and of itself, sensation is utterly meaningless. Venus Flytrap.
October 08, 2018 at 01:58
No. Meaning is not existentially dependent upon language. Nor is sensation. Sensation is a necessary elemental constituent of both meaning and languag...
October 08, 2018 at 01:42
Do you draw this distinction between sensation and experience?
October 08, 2018 at 01:36
All experience, on my view, must be meaningful to the creature. I do not conflate sensation with experience. Rather, the latter consists, in part at l...
October 08, 2018 at 01:34
All meaning requires a plurality of things and a creature capable of making connections between them. So, it is clear that existence precedes meaning,...
October 08, 2018 at 01:21
That's still false.
October 08, 2018 at 01:15
This bears repeating...
October 08, 2018 at 01:05
You weren't leaving aside the question of whether or not experiences are meaningful when you first asked me what was being interpreted if not for thos...
October 08, 2018 at 01:04
October 08, 2018 at 00:55
I'd love to have an audience capable of allowing that to take place. You'd be a great participant in such a situation.
October 08, 2018 at 00:41
Sensation... Is it existentially dependent upon language? I would argue in the negative.
October 08, 2018 at 00:39
You weren't leaving aside the question of whether or not experiences are meaningful when you first asked me what was being interpreted if not for thos...
October 08, 2018 at 00:18
That's false.
October 08, 2018 at 00:13
Well, we could always compare/contrast our respective conceptions of "sensation"... Something tells me that none of you will.
October 08, 2018 at 00:12
Your questions were based upon your framework(your notion of "sensation" to be exact). Your framework is different than mine. That's a problem all by ...
October 07, 2018 at 23:08
The quality of the question plays a significant role too, right?
October 07, 2018 at 22:08