You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Michael

Comments

Every word is invented by imagination. So what about the word "omnipotence" makes its definition wrong?
July 19, 2021 at 14:07
I don't know what you mean by the definition of "omnipotence" being wrong.
July 19, 2021 at 13:21
This is just a misguided question, giving too much significance to a word. It is said that there is a being, God, which created the universe and has t...
July 19, 2021 at 12:49
If omnipotence includes being able to commit suicide then if someone is omnipotent then they can commit suicide.
July 19, 2021 at 10:51
For sale: baby.
July 19, 2021 at 09:46
The best thing about the reputation stuff is that I can now channel my inner YouTube content creator and end every post with "don't forget to like, co...
July 15, 2021 at 14:56
Wittgenstein, Dummett, and anti-realism Lottery paradox The Raven Paradox The simulation argument and the Boltzmann brain paradox The problem with the...
July 15, 2021 at 13:46
:lol:
July 15, 2021 at 13:38
Kremlin papers appear to show Putin’s plot to put Trump in White House
July 15, 2021 at 11:59
We introduced a new "No Akanthinos" rule.
July 15, 2021 at 08:26
That's what I did?
July 14, 2021 at 18:53
Yes, and neither is an example of modus ponens. The syntax of the problematic version simply gives the false appearance of one. Much like a sentence s...
July 14, 2021 at 18:48
Yes, I'd say this.
July 14, 2021 at 14:14
Sort of misleading. They were warned of potential air raids, but it was specifically decided not to warn them about the nuke. And in the case of Nagas...
July 14, 2021 at 09:43
They tell you, just like they tell you their name. The post you were responding to was responding to the OP saying "the issue comes from when Person B...
July 14, 2021 at 09:15
One issue is that the icon to like a post is hidden by default unless you hover over the post (on desktop) or click the post twice (on mobile), so I t...
July 14, 2021 at 08:57
For someone with gender dysphoria the mismatch between their biological sex and their gender identity is a cause of distress for them, which coupled w...
July 14, 2021 at 08:18
Love that album. Although Plans is my favourite of theirs.
July 13, 2021 at 19:57
Not because of Planck-scale constraints, although it may be that the Planck-scale happens to be the smallest movement possible. I would say that conti...
July 13, 2021 at 15:35
Illicit minor
July 13, 2021 at 14:49
Continuous motion. Yes. However, motion is possible, therefore motion is discontinuous as the OP suggests.
July 13, 2021 at 14:29
There is no first point to pass, and so motion cannot start. Just as there is no first fraction to count, and so counting the fractions (in order) can...
July 13, 2021 at 14:27
I'm sorry, but I made a promise not to like them and I never break my promises. Kant demands it!
July 13, 2021 at 14:11
The issue about the time it takes to pass each point is only one of the issues to resolve (one that can be resolved if the time taken per point is a c...
July 13, 2021 at 13:57
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/paradox-zeno/#Dic
July 13, 2021 at 13:51
Then I promise to never like your posts.
July 13, 2021 at 12:55
1. A ? (B ? C) 2. ¬(B ? C) 3. ¬A If a Republican wins the election then if it's not Reagan who wins it will be Anderson If it's not Reagan who wins it...
July 13, 2021 at 12:50
See here. When you replace A ? (B ? C) with the logically equivalent (A ? B) ? C you'll see that it isn't modus ponens. The former just gives the fals...
July 13, 2021 at 11:56
I thought your point was that it was supposed to be an example of an invalid modus ponens? Except it's not a modus ponens at all.
July 13, 2021 at 11:38
A ? (B ? C) is equivalent to (A ? B) ? C (see Exportation (logic)). So the argument above is: 1. (A ? B) ? C 2. A 3. B ? C Which isn't modus ponens.
July 13, 2021 at 11:04
If movement is infinitely divisible then to move from one point to another requires having passed an infinite sequence of points in between, which for...
July 13, 2021 at 08:55
What did Southgate and his team do?
July 12, 2021 at 08:27
True, I suppose it could be argued that the mind and brain are distinct but that both are physical, so it would be neither substance nor property dual...
July 07, 2021 at 13:22
I wonder if an answer to this is even needed at this stage. Can the debate be reframed as "is the mind a property of the brain or a separate entity th...
July 07, 2021 at 12:22
Matter, strictly speaking, is any substance that has rest mass and volume. There are aspects of the physical world that do not have rest mass or volum...
July 07, 2021 at 09:19
Yes. I'm not sure what you're asking for. You want me to visit you and physically present you with the evidence? Because I can't do that, and it's unr...
July 07, 2021 at 09:10
Yes. Creation of a Bacterial Cell Controlled by a Chemically Synthesized Genome
July 07, 2021 at 08:12
I agree with this. I don't think quoting should be allowed in these debates. It should flow as an offline debate would. Also standard grammar and punc...
July 06, 2021 at 12:37
This debate seems to have the same issue that the previous one had, and reaffirms my belief that the general format of these debates should be that ea...
July 06, 2021 at 12:34
Not if God is omniscient. An omniscient god will know -- have a justified true belief -- that it is raining, and so "but no one believes it is raining...
July 06, 2021 at 11:21
What's the minimum?
July 05, 2021 at 15:00
Unless it's the Second Amendment. That's effectively the Eleventh Commandment.
July 05, 2021 at 14:56
The metaphysics of laws. Quite the discussion for the shoutbox.
July 05, 2021 at 12:59
It derives from the German “Fußball”, or “fussball”, referring to players “fussing”, or “showing unnecessary or excessive concern” over a ball.
July 04, 2021 at 11:57
As someone who doesn’t watch football, the sooner England lose the better. It’s getting hard to find somewhere to drink on the weekends when everythin...
July 04, 2021 at 11:39
Happy illegal rebellion day my colonial friends.
July 04, 2021 at 11:33
We turned likes on, and that number is how many you’ve had.
July 03, 2021 at 22:32
There is no puzzle. There are times when we call a collection of sand grains a heap and there are times when we don't, but there is no clearly defined...
July 01, 2021 at 13:42
Less interesting, but correct. Essentialism is false. There isn't a set of (mutually exclusive) necessary and sufficient conditions that qualifies a p...
July 01, 2021 at 13:07
Yes. The implicit premise is "if P1) a single grain is clearly not a heap and P2) adding a single grain can never turn a non-heap into a heap then C) ...
July 01, 2021 at 12:11