You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Postmodern Beatnik

['Member']Joined: October 28, 2015 at 05:00Last active: March 28, 2016 at 05:31None discussions69 comments

Bio

Just an old-fashioned cowboy.

Favourite Philosopher

David Hume

Favourite Quotations

The dangers for a philosopher's development are indeed so manifold today that one may doubt whether this fruit can still ripen at all. The scope and the tower-building of the sciences has grown to be enormous, and with this also the probability that the philosopher grows weary while still learning or allows himself to be detained somewhere to become a "specialist"—so he never attains his proper level, the height for a comprehensive look, for looking around, for looking down. Or he attains it too late, when his best time and strength are spent—or impaired, coarsened, degenerated, so his view, his over-all value judgment does not mean much any more. It may be precisely the sensitivity of his intellectual conscience that leads him to delay somewhere along the way and to be late: he is afraid of the seduction to become a dilettante, a millipede, an insect with a thousand antennae; he knows too well that whoever has lost his self-respect cannot command or lead in the realm of knowledge—unless he would like to become a great actor, a philosophical Cagliostro and pied piper, in short, a seducer. This is in the end a question of taste, even if it were not a question of conscience.

Add to this, by way of once more doubling the difficulties for a philosopher, that he demands of himself a judgment, a Yes or No, not about the sciences but about life and the value of life—that he is reluctant to come to believe that he has a right, or even a duty, to such a judgment, and must seek his way to this right and faith only from the most comprehensive—perhaps most disturbing and destructive—experiences, and frequently hesitates, doubts, and lapses into science.

Indeed, the crowd has for a long time misjudged and mistaken the philosopher, whether for a scientific man and ideal scholar or for a religiously elevated, desensualized, "desecularized" enthusiast and sot of God. And if a man is praised today for living "wisely" or "as a philosopher," it hardly means more than "prudently and apart." Wisdom—seems to the rabble a kind of escape, a means and trick for getting well out of a wicked game. But the genuine philosopher—as it seems to us, my friends?—lives "unphilosophically" and "unwisely," above all imprudently, and feels the burden and the duty of a hundred attempts and temptations of life—he risks himself constantly, he plays the wicked game...

—Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil (§205)

Comments

Here are a few contemporary works, some of which are bleeding edge current: • Craig Bourne - A Future for Presentism • Ross Cameron - The Moving Spotl...
March 07, 2016 at 03:30
The problem is that the example is bad. No one has interpreted it that way. If you think so, then you are thoroughly confused. Well, all of the claims...
January 04, 2016 at 14:20
If the example isn't evidence (even if just by way of illustration), then what was the purpose of presenting it? Yeah, that's called "evidence." I was...
January 04, 2016 at 04:28
Before I say another word, have you actually taken the time to read the thread and notice the various clarifications that have been given along the wa...
January 03, 2016 at 18:14
Good thing I'm not doing that, then. No. Of course I am going after the example. The example was your evidence, so the point doesn't stand if the evid...
January 03, 2016 at 18:12
Since this seems to be so confusing for some people, here is the revised version of the argument: P1 If any gratuitous suffering is preventable and kn...
January 03, 2016 at 15:41
Which means it was never true that all Ys ought to save X. So again, the argument is unsound. And more importantly, it is not analogous to anything th...
January 03, 2016 at 15:37
Then the two of you shouldn't have presented your comments as objections. If I point out that "all" entails "some" and you guys respond with some vers...
January 03, 2016 at 15:35
Okay, but what's the problem here? If the premises are true, then the conclusion is true. But if you think the conclusion is false, then you ought to ...
January 03, 2016 at 06:20
But then it's not your contribution. It may be the case that boycotting a farm could result in the farmer changing his practices. But your example of ...
January 03, 2016 at 05:23
If we're talking about literal villages, then sure. But then they expand. Or they spawn a new generation of inhabitants, which ends up split between t...
December 30, 2015 at 21:35
For the same reasons we form non-global villages (e.g., social cooperation, economic benefits, a unified justice system). This is just as true within ...
December 30, 2015 at 20:05
And yet no one else does. P6 isn't about gratuitous suffering simpliciter, though. It's about gratuitous suffering caused by food production practices...
December 30, 2015 at 17:39
You know, that's the kind of point that the developers might actually be sympathetic to. It might be worth asking them to change it (or even suggestin...
December 30, 2015 at 05:23
No problem! This has been fun, even if it is just an exercise. Right. This is the point to focus on. You let me push you into a corner before by sayin...
December 30, 2015 at 05:18
This doesn't strike me as either an accurate or an informative explanation of cosmopolitanism. In political philosophy, cosmopolitans reject the legit...
December 30, 2015 at 04:56
Well, your uncertainty notwithstanding, it's still a basic fact of logic. This argument is invalid. I have already dealt with cases like this above. T...
December 30, 2015 at 03:05
I've been posting links to the principle of charity (as well as certain fallacies) the first time I mention it on a thread for ten years. It's a habit...
December 25, 2015 at 15:19
You seem to be confused. All I was saying with the point about charity is that the one interpretation is obviously not what was intended that there's ...
December 25, 2015 at 03:40
But I don't think one has to be a hard-line skeptic to deny the strong version (which is what I was responding to). There's a very soft kind of skepti...
December 24, 2015 at 17:09
If I were focused on "being right," I wouldn't be admitting that my argumentative resources had run out on the issue. Instead, I'd be trying to bring ...
December 20, 2015 at 16:05
I don't have to assume what your comments reveal. And in any case, my point about becoming more familiar with the discipline was just a repetition of ...
December 20, 2015 at 01:37
On the actual topic of this discussion, Simon Blackburn recently published an essay on the value of studying philosophy. In it, he makes some comments...
December 20, 2015 at 00:21
Well, of course you're not. At this point, you are too invested in saying that there aren't any to suddenly see them. And as I've already noted, there...
December 20, 2015 at 00:20
Thanks for letting us know, hyena. It's good to hear from you, though I'm sorry that this was the occasion for it. I hope all is well with you and you...
December 19, 2015 at 18:22
Let's take a simpler example. Suppose that agent subjectivism is true: statements of the form "x is permissible/obligatory/wrong" mean something like ...
December 16, 2015 at 15:51
I think it is a mistake to tie these questions so closely together. It is completely possible to think both that there are real moral facts, but that ...
December 16, 2015 at 02:28
I don't understand the criticism. For one, realism, nihilism, and relativism aren't theses about moral language. Realism is constituted in part by a c...
December 15, 2015 at 22:48
But when there are two interpretations and one of them has no problems, you assume the one with no problems is the one that was intended. It's called ...
December 15, 2015 at 17:11
Great. But in fact, "some" always follows from "all." To say that something is true of all members of a set is to say that it is true of each member. ...
December 15, 2015 at 01:34
Whether there is a direct link depends on the subject. But you have yet to show why a direct link matters to the validity of the argument. It's unclea...
December 14, 2015 at 17:19
That depends on the person. Not everyone gets their food from a supermarket or a restaurant. But the choice is not between reading P6 as meaning "by e...
December 14, 2015 at 04:17
I suppose. You would need to specify that you are intending this as a stipulative definition, however, or else you're going to get objections from "st...
December 12, 2015 at 19:09
Sure. But the standard way of writing that would be to identify P7 as following from P6 (which would make P7 C3), and then C3 (which would now be C4) ...
December 12, 2015 at 16:25
@"MIchael" @"darthbarracuda" From the OP: "If there is an interest to discuss the soundness of the premises, I can create a spinoff thread elsewhere."...
December 11, 2015 at 15:14
Ethics is about how to live (with some people focusing more on what makes a life good, others focusing on what counts as living rightly, and still oth...
December 03, 2015 at 17:25
Yes, I realize that I might be missing a lot for not having read the other threads. But I do wonder where you are seeing these broad tendencies. At le...
November 20, 2015 at 18:04
I actually don't agree with either of these. There may be such a thing as proper English and deficient, derivative, or distorted versions of it, as we...
November 20, 2015 at 05:16
It would be nice if we could retain the formatting when quoting highlighted text.
November 19, 2015 at 03:21
And according to some ways of thinking, the main part—and the part towards which all others are aimed. But we can leave such claims to the side. Ethic...
November 17, 2015 at 00:34
A distinctly modern notion. The ancient philosophers would have argued that philosophy simply cannot be done in isolation and without cross-examinatio...
November 16, 2015 at 22:52
I'm pretty sure we're in agreement here, but I would like to clarify. I take it you are saying that even in these unsatisfying cases (when we think th...
November 16, 2015 at 21:22
I agree that this is a real issue for those who would decry the study of problems they have deemed unresolvable, and I have serious doubts about many ...
November 16, 2015 at 02:35
Options > Edit Profile > Show Ratings? > No I still don't think this is true. In addition to the reasons I have already presented, I think it would ma...
November 16, 2015 at 00:28
Correct. Which was more or less my point. 8-)
November 16, 2015 at 00:18
I accept your apology. No problem. I agree that taste is going to be a large part of it. I'm not sure we can achieve this in any context. It's less a ...
November 15, 2015 at 16:06
First, the antecedent of your conditional is false. That's not the point of likes (and there would be no accumulated karma score if option 3 succeeds)...
November 15, 2015 at 06:01
Do you, perchance, have an argument for this? It might be helpful to actually defend your view (not just to get your way, but also to enlighten others...
November 14, 2015 at 19:46
I know there have been a lot of articles written about the factual errors behind Rubio's statement, but here's a nice (and short!) piece from Neil Sin...
November 14, 2015 at 16:59
Sure, but I take it that the issue here is about undue influences, which context (the general category into which each of your examples falls) does no...
November 14, 2015 at 16:51