I find it hard to imagine how anything like 'a world' could exist without the possibility of suffering. After all, animals predate each other. Evoluti...
:up: Incidentally do you happen to know if the James Gleick book The Information is worth reading? There's a copy for $20.00 at the local second-hand ...
DNA and RNA encode information. That is why I quoted the 'central dogma of molecular biology'. So I understand what you're saying, but I think it's in...
He most assuredly is not. He is claiming that there's an ontological distinction between living and inorganic matter and so, presumably, in the kinds ...
The point about biological information is that it is morphological. It's causal - as said, it retains information and transmits it. Random sounds or p...
Because he felt that the science should stand on its own two feet. I think it's an important principle to understand. A scientific thesis has to have ...
Deep question. William of Ockham was one of the first and most influential of the nominalists. Nominalists were those who dispute the reality of unive...
Popular myth. Properly speaking, it’s indifferent to the subject. It’s up to metaphysics to accommodate the empirical discoveries of science, which it...
At least someone is. I bought a really expensive textbook on the subject, which I was just starting to absorb, but haven't been able to find it since ...
Not at all what I said. If you're going to paraphrase something, you need to understand it. The statement I made was supported with a reference to the...
Hence the emphasis in biosemiotics about the centrality of signs and signalling to biological processes. 'Transmitting meaning' to knowers requires th...
That example is entirely bogus, which is why you had to enclose “knows” In scare quotes. It’s medieval - the stone “knows” is must be nearer the earth...
On the plus side, I note that you're making an effort to relate your idea of metaphysics to Aristotle's. Also on the plus side, you go to a lot of tro...
You haven't addressed the argument concerning the sense in which mathematical objects, numbers, and by extension also, scientific laws and physical pr...
Hang on. Where we started was with this exchange: It was at that point that I brought up the significance of 'falsifiability'. I made the point that P...
Don’t know whether to put this here or in the Trump thread but oh well. https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2022/03/exclusive-kremlin-putin-russia-uk...
Where he and I seem to differ, from my perspective, is that although he gestures towards 'downward causation', ultimately all causation has to be bott...
There is a technical term in Advaita Vedanta, 'nirvikalpa samadhi', ' a state of awareness where the ego and samskaras have been dissolved and bare aw...
But the issue there is that the 'criterion of falsifiability' was devised by Karl Popper specifically to differentiate an empirical from a non-empiric...
I’m generally sympathetic to your motives, although I have to say, critical of your methods. I’m on the same side of the ledger as yourself - critical...
Took me years to work that out! Here’s a hint: select an instance and click QUOTE and you will see how it’s done. That Richard Lewontin quote was from...
It doesn’t sound like Kant. What it sounds like is garbled version of the Heisenberg quote, ‘what we observe is not nature itself but nature exposed t...
Got a reference for that? No, not what I had in mind. Some way in which human existence is part of a cosmic story, and not simply a fluke occurence, t...
Comments