You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

T_Clark

Comments

In: Choice  — view comment
I don't think we have any difficulty answering Mew's question, we just have difficulty agreeing. And then you brought free will into it. If you and Ti...
June 03, 2017 at 15:44
I know you are, but what am I? Or - Oh yeah!? Or something like that
June 03, 2017 at 15:34
The etymology of the word "philosophy" is from the Greek for "love of wisdom", but that's not what the word means. Should we define it?
June 03, 2017 at 15:28
Go through all the posts on the website. I would not call the general tone "happy." People who think too much tend to be a melancholy and self-involve...
June 03, 2017 at 15:23
What's different for different people is the balance between ignorance and examination. Different things work for different people. Why all this fanfa...
June 03, 2017 at 15:20
I like the phrase "play the game" in this context and I don't see it as dismissive. I don't think "we have no idea why." We have too many ideas why, a...
June 03, 2017 at 15:11
As I said in a previous post, here is a possible answer to the question "what grounds them?
June 03, 2017 at 14:43
Perhaps that is a good definition of "relativism." Or is that what you were saying.
June 03, 2017 at 14:31
More evidence - we'll argue about anything.
June 03, 2017 at 14:27
No, no, I insist.
June 03, 2017 at 14:23
Isn't that true of any except the simplest idea, perhaps something as definite as mathematics as Srap Tasmaner has been writing.
June 03, 2017 at 14:22
I don't think we will resolve our differences on this matter. Whatever I say will just be a repeat of something I said before, so I'm going to leave t...
June 03, 2017 at 14:11
I disagree. As I said, at the level we are discussing, i.e. restaurant bills and similar situations, math is just arithmetic. It's trivial. The capita...
June 03, 2017 at 02:18
Agreed. But there aren't all that many questions that are just about the math. Math questions are easily answered without conflict not because they ar...
June 03, 2017 at 00:40
Have you ever split up a bill before? "I think we should just split the bill three ways." "No way, I only had one drink but Bill had three and I had a...
June 03, 2017 at 00:01
Maybe "legitimate" is not the right word. Maybe "reasonable" is better. Reasonable in that basic principles are 1) clearly stated and 2) justified bas...
June 02, 2017 at 23:56
In a previous post I laid out an impressionistic list of basic human values I think could form the basis of a legitimate relativistic moral code. Hows...
June 02, 2017 at 22:30
In: Choice  — view comment
Choices don't have to be rational. As a matter of fact, I think they generally aren't. My wife asks me - "would you like pizza or shrimp for dinner?" ...
June 02, 2017 at 22:14
Yes, we could split the bill with few issues. We could just as easily agree that it was morally or ethically wrong when Tim Wood snuck off without pay...
June 02, 2017 at 20:50
I like the emphasis on cultural and societal context. I think it makes a relativist position more rigorous and more consistent with human nature. Both...
June 02, 2017 at 19:07
In: Choice  — view comment
Thanks. I'd like to hear what Mew has to say too.
June 02, 2017 at 19:02
I described a philosophical approach - "The doctrine that knowledge, truth, and morality exist in relation to culture, society, or historical context,...
June 02, 2017 at 18:59
In: Choice  — view comment
I didn't say that preferences or strong desires dictate choices. I made a specific distinction between desires and other factors which motivate action...
June 02, 2017 at 18:52
You and I are using the word "relativism" differently. As is my wont, I've gone to the internet and looked up five definitions The view that truth and...
June 02, 2017 at 18:15
In: Choice  — view comment
My first reaction is "no," but I'm not sure about that. What difference does it make if it is?
June 02, 2017 at 17:53
Math is only objectively true as long as it is abstract. When you start filling in the blanks with information from the real world, you get all the un...
June 02, 2017 at 16:11
I am getting a little tired of this misrepresentation of the relativist position. Here's a definition I used in a previous post on this thread - "the ...
June 02, 2017 at 16:05
No paradox. Irony maybe. Both willful ignorance and searching for understanding can have positive or negative results. There's a lot going on the worl...
June 02, 2017 at 12:56
In: Choice  — view comment
Here's how I experience choice. I'm not sure what the philosophical or psychological implications are. I picture a spring, water bubbling up from unde...
June 02, 2017 at 12:35
It is not a matter of what I expect you to believe, it is a matter of the actual meaning of the phrase "ad hominem." What I said was in no way, direct...
June 02, 2017 at 00:41
Let's see. So. Are you saying that criticism that is snotty and condescending can still be constructive? There was no ad hominem attack in my post. I ...
June 01, 2017 at 23:34
I don't want to go getting into a discussion of "truth" here. There are 457 other threads where that has been beaten with a stick. Be that as it may, ...
June 01, 2017 at 23:15
Are you saying you're going to use force against people because they disagree with your philosophy? You talk about absolute moral values, I would have...
June 01, 2017 at 23:06
In common English usage, when we're talking about physical rather than moral matters, incorrect and wrong are synonyms. They mean the same thing, with...
June 01, 2017 at 22:27
Here is a definition of "relativism" from a dictionary site - "the doctrine that knowledge, truth, and morality exist in relation to culture, society,...
May 31, 2017 at 23:26
I went on line. Here are five definitions of “anger” I found on dictionary sites and Wikipedia: A strong feeling of annoyance, displeasure, or hostili...
May 31, 2017 at 22:44
Your criticism is not constructive, it is snotty and condescending. Which would be ok, I guess, if it were helpful and responsive, but it's not. Most ...
May 31, 2017 at 20:55
Here's my opinion. The rules of philosophy, those that make it useful, are the rules of reason. Are they strict? They are unavoidable. If you don't fo...
May 30, 2017 at 20:56
I am lost with this whole "existence = logical consistency" thing. In what sense is a billiard ball logically consistent? How can a physical object be...
May 30, 2017 at 20:00
That would be an interesting question for another thread.
May 30, 2017 at 19:31
I must admit, I've gotten lost in this back and forth between noAxioms and litewave, so I've been reading, but not participating. I do have a problem ...
May 30, 2017 at 16:17
Nitpicking. They compare sets with uncountably large numbers of members. It exists to the extent I understand that the universe, which does exist, may...
May 30, 2017 at 00:48
I don't want to go down this path now, it's off post, but I'll say this - Love is no more the pattern of neurons blinking in my brain than the basketb...
May 29, 2017 at 23:30
And yet mathematicians talk about and use the concept of infinity in productive ways all the time.
May 29, 2017 at 14:34
"...objective existence, a term with which I have yet to find any meaning." We sort of agree, but I think the terms "objective existence" and "objecti...
May 29, 2017 at 02:25
"naming a new concept can at times bring awareness of the concept into existence within the minds of others …" Let's see. Maybe I'm saying "awareness ...
May 29, 2017 at 02:12
"Ah, but these stated givens don’t exist because they were named. They were named, and conceptualized, because they exist." And I say it is useful to ...
May 28, 2017 at 17:32
And my response to you is the same as mine for Owen.
May 28, 2017 at 17:02
Of course Vulcan, Pegasus, and Santa exist. Or are you saying that only things that have a physical representation exist? By that standard, mathematic...
May 28, 2017 at 17:00
"to exist is to be spoken of." Yes. As Lao Tzu may have written - "The unnamable is the eternally real. Naming is the origin of all particular things....
May 28, 2017 at 16:07