You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

_db

Comments

Yes, "triumphalist" is a good way of putting it. Reminds me of Hegel's quote from his Phenomenology: "The more conventional opinion gets fixated on th...
September 04, 2017 at 04:56
One of the main things I'm concerned about is the desire to assimilate all philosophy into a "scientific" methodology, in the sense of, divide-and-con...
September 04, 2017 at 04:35
While I agree "the public" has lost its understanding of philosophy, it is informed by the pop-scientists who continue to label themselves as "rationa...
September 04, 2017 at 04:23
I have no issue with the methodology of science, and I don't deny that science has bequeathed us with many helpful things (but also many harmful thing...
September 04, 2017 at 03:11
The Right and the Good by W. D. Ross.
September 03, 2017 at 23:29
I'm not sure.
September 03, 2017 at 23:22
Contraceptives. They were instrumental in getting us out of the Malthusian trap.
September 03, 2017 at 22:49
Scientists =/= atheists. There are plenty of theistic scientists. Actually, more specifically, science =/= (metaphysical) naturalism. Scientists are n...
September 03, 2017 at 22:45
But in philosophy, if you call yourself an atheist, you better have good reasons for believing God to be non-existent. If proving a negative is so dif...
September 03, 2017 at 22:41
Another question would be, is it the ball that shatters the window, or is it the individual atoms that collectively shatter the window? Is the ball an...
September 03, 2017 at 21:31
Compassion
September 02, 2017 at 08:16
A contradiction in terms. :s
August 31, 2017 at 04:32
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMmRac5wYv4
August 31, 2017 at 04:31
I will reply to you when I get around to it, I'm fairly busy.
August 29, 2017 at 03:59
oky doky.
August 29, 2017 at 01:15
Can you give an example, I don't know what you mean.
August 29, 2017 at 00:59
Thanks.
August 29, 2017 at 00:39
The issue I see here is that you're wanting a foundationalist structure of belief when there in fact is none. Phenomenologically, we do not "live" by ...
August 28, 2017 at 16:52
Do you have a background in biology? You seem to know more about this than the average person like me. I most exposure I had to biology was my high sc...
August 28, 2017 at 16:41
What do we know about the development of sexual organs? Did the male and female sexual organs develop concurrently, or was one organ around before the...
August 27, 2017 at 23:13
"Science rushes headlong, without selectivity, without “taste,” at whatever is knowable, in the blind desire to know all at any cost. Philosophical th...
August 27, 2017 at 22:36
Very true, good point. Interesting points, thank you. It's not really about gender more than it is about biological sex. If we define biological sex a...
August 25, 2017 at 01:31
ouch
August 25, 2017 at 00:41
It's hard to say how much pain is necessary for survival to be lexically removed. I can't give you a precise amount but I would say that any amount of...
August 24, 2017 at 21:18
Why? Error theory is an extremely implausible hypothesis. Are you absolutely committed to the thesis that the wanton torture of innocents is amoral? G...
August 24, 2017 at 17:12
Of course there are definite good reasons for contributing the majority of one's disposable income to charity. The consequentialist has to find the ba...
August 24, 2017 at 17:02
One of the non-obvious aspects of consequentialist thinking is that we are not normally consequentialists in our everyday living (which of course rais...
August 23, 2017 at 23:31
I feel like what happens a lot when people study philosophy is that they don't actually really learn anything, but somewhere along the line they get t...
August 22, 2017 at 17:07
No, this is wrong. Are you seriously telling me Nietzsche advocated his metaphysical scheme based on faith?! No, this is also wrong. Quantum mechanics...
August 22, 2017 at 13:09
Not mine, don't kill the messenger! No, please don't start this. I want scientific theories (which you graciously provided), not a debate about antina...
August 22, 2017 at 05:36
I have thought about this before as well. The phenomenology of planning is that there are multiple options, choices, that are possible. So the questio...
August 22, 2017 at 04:20
Might want to look into Simon Blackburn's quasi-realism. It still runs into the difficulty of justifying how exactly morality is objective, but it man...
August 22, 2017 at 00:02
It's really the only thing that truly gives me an enduring sense of satisfaction and fulfillment, other than close friends and family. I came across i...
August 21, 2017 at 23:06
No, science does not dodge "why" questions, it just traces the answers as far back as is needed to make the model work. There's no need to insert some...
August 21, 2017 at 23:01
Intuition. Moral naturalism is a lost cause, and divine command theory is either ad hoc or fails from Euthyphro.
August 20, 2017 at 19:07
I'm not finished reading Braver's book yet, but as I recall Dummett equated realism with the principle of bivalence because he wanted to steer as far ...
August 16, 2017 at 16:57
Antifa wouldn't exist if it wasn't for the neo-Nazis imo
August 16, 2017 at 16:45
Sure, science has done a lot of nice things. But it's still pretty boring.
August 16, 2017 at 06:13
Ermahgerd Wersherngtern equerls Rerbert ee Leee kek kek
August 16, 2017 at 05:56
Fuck the alt-reich
August 16, 2017 at 05:36
In many (most?) cases, philosophy is born from a certain desperation. Wittgenstein seemed to be aware of this, but so was Heidegger, and Descartes' wa...
August 16, 2017 at 05:23
Philosophy Forums user, Thorongil, ends friendship with darthbarracuda. Subtract 100 respect.
August 15, 2017 at 21:19
No I'm not trolling. I'm making a joke.
August 15, 2017 at 21:14
This is wrong. Lemons only need to exist at the moment of lemonade-making.
August 15, 2017 at 21:13
I don't know how else to account for your inability to comprehend a very simple issue. But oh well.
August 15, 2017 at 20:21
Anyone got some lemonade, I'm getting thirsty
August 15, 2017 at 20:19
Christ, be charitable. Lemons do not need to exist beforehand in order to make lemonade, if that clears things up. They need only exist at the time of...
August 15, 2017 at 20:17
???
August 15, 2017 at 20:16
How does acknowledging a lemon's prior existence contradict my claim that the only thing that matters is that the lemon exists at the moment of lemona...
August 15, 2017 at 20:10
No, that's not what I meant at all. I said the duration doesn't matter because it doesn't matter at all whether or not lemons exist before lemonade-ma...
August 15, 2017 at 20:04