You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

_db

Comments

No, I haven't, where are you getting this from? Honestly can you stop being an ass. That doesn't even follow either. If I really was making those two ...
August 15, 2017 at 19:59
Right. But they can be born?
August 15, 2017 at 19:48
You said: Implying that I said lemons do not need to exist before to make lemonade, and then said they do. But this is false because I explicitly said...
August 15, 2017 at 19:40
Yet the epicurean position is precisely that death cannot harm the person themselves because a person does not exist after they die. It seems ad hoc t...
August 15, 2017 at 19:37
No, I didn't. Read that again.
August 15, 2017 at 19:36
So why cannot birth harm a person? ...okay? How is that relevant?
August 15, 2017 at 19:33
Right but a person doesn't exist after they died so how can it harm them. This whole "argument" is going in circles, punctuated by emoji's and sarcast...
August 15, 2017 at 19:24
??? I meant specifically the person dying, not those around them. So you're taking the epicurean stance on this. Yeah...no.
August 15, 2017 at 19:09
No that's not right. The history of a lemon's existence is irrelevant at the time of lemonade-making. It doesn't matter if it existed for a century or...
August 15, 2017 at 18:57
I agree, it is well-written and very interesting.
August 15, 2017 at 18:38
Lemons don't need to exist "before" making lemonade. They just need to exist at the time of making lemonade.
August 15, 2017 at 02:06
It wouldn't be "helped", it would have been "benefited". Helped implies there is something harmful that needs to be removed. I mean, no shit. But why ...
August 15, 2017 at 01:39
:-| Criminal negligence is a thing. This makes it seem like existence does, in fact, help or harm someone by enabling them to be harmed.
August 15, 2017 at 01:22
But there is - the person who is being born. They are being born. Birth is happening - to them. If a person cannot be harmed by being born because the...
August 15, 2017 at 01:13
That's like saying you aren't harming a child by not making them wear a seatbelt, you're just providing the conditions that enable the child to be har...
August 14, 2017 at 23:09
??? You can't be harmed if you do not exist. Coming into existence implies you now exist. If this existence harms you, then you have been harmed by co...
August 14, 2017 at 21:51
A Thing of This World: A History of Continental Anti-Realism by Lee Braver.
August 14, 2017 at 20:52
That coming into existence can be harmful. You're going to need to explain why.
August 14, 2017 at 20:47
:-} No, obviously you need to exist to be harmed. You just don't need to exist before the harm occurs in order to be harmed. There's nothing incoheren...
August 14, 2017 at 20:41
Hardly, for we don't need someone to exist before they're born to be harmed. If something is bad to experience, then it is harmful for a person to exp...
August 14, 2017 at 03:28
As a side note, I am using deontology in a broader sense than Kant's ethics. Common sense ethics is often deontological.
August 14, 2017 at 00:36
https://i.redd.it/l1t9n9we0g6z.jpg
August 13, 2017 at 20:45
I'll take a swing at it, although my take is more ethical. Here's the argument I give in the book I'm writing: " Premise 1: If a person has an experie...
August 13, 2017 at 20:19
I think this is probably what van Inwagen was arguing for. The idea, I think, is that if God had prevented Evil Happening x from happening, then peopl...
August 12, 2017 at 18:33
I wasn't particularly focused on your brand of antinatalism, but I will say I disagree with it. It's not just aesthetic, it's a definite ethical probl...
August 12, 2017 at 04:33
I think that could be generalized and applied to basically any marginal ethical/political point of view, regardless of its validity. Radicals like to ...
August 12, 2017 at 01:13
Yo I'm gonna steal this (Y) 8-) I'll give credit, of course.
August 12, 2017 at 00:00
No, he puts animal suffering outside, not natural disasters and freak accidents.
August 11, 2017 at 03:58
What caused you to plan and deliberate to jump in the air?
August 11, 2017 at 03:36
Right, that's what I thought he meant, as I said in the beginning. That human free will is good, and God's reconciliation plan requires that this free...
August 11, 2017 at 03:28
An unexpected first reply. But I don't understand how it's relevant. The question is: if God could have prevented a terrible horror from occurring, wh...
August 11, 2017 at 03:06
The fact that many of the things we find to be of good character or virtue in a person are that which help meliorate against the many things we find t...
August 10, 2017 at 03:00
Conquest of Abundance by Paul Feyerabend.
August 08, 2017 at 01:17
Is this post simply a mechanism meant to sustain the continuation of life? What about actions that are clearly detrimental to the continuation of life...
August 07, 2017 at 17:42
Our common notion of causality requires the passage of time. What does it mean for something to "begin" to exist, or "have a cause" outside of time?
August 07, 2017 at 04:11
I think there's also an element of disbelief accompanying all this. Like it's actually hard to believe, not because it's far-fetched but simply becaus...
August 06, 2017 at 21:59
So we have the goal-seeking need for need, as in, we need more needs because needs entail goals and goals are good, and we have the "philosophical" pr...
August 06, 2017 at 19:39
Right, precisely.
August 06, 2017 at 17:48
I suppose what I was trying to get at is that, even if we recognize the repetitiveness of existence (existence being not simply that which exists righ...
August 06, 2017 at 15:24
So I think the problem of instrumentality is that there is no end to the "but why?" questions - how could there be? Why do I exist? Because my parents...
August 05, 2017 at 23:10
From Will To Power: "At the same time I grasped that my instinct went into the opposite direction from Schopenhauer's: toward a justification of life,...
August 05, 2017 at 19:19
What about Euthyphro, do the gods love what is just because it is just or is it just because the gods love it? If morality derived its legitimacy from...
August 05, 2017 at 18:34
I would have thought authority would have derived its legitimacy from morality, not vice versa.
August 05, 2017 at 04:24
If you haven't read Tolstoy I highly suggest you do. In A Confession, he explains how he thinks there are four general types of people: 1.) Those who ...
August 05, 2017 at 04:20
By most people I mean to say the vast majority. Not including those incapable of higher-level abstract thought, young children or the occasional and g...
August 05, 2017 at 04:12
Or a failure, yes. As opposed to not weak-willed? Strong-willed? Idk what you would call it. We lack the guts. ?
August 04, 2017 at 15:24
I mean sure you can "choose" to live but really what that means is that you choose to procrastinate your suicide. Trying to find a real reason to live...
August 04, 2017 at 06:09
Not mind reading but by studying human psychology which is close enough. Most people live out of habit or because they fear death. There's really no "...
August 04, 2017 at 05:45
You can choose to be a carpenter. You can choose to be a painter. You can choose to be a desk-job worker. You can choose to be a scientist. You can ch...
August 04, 2017 at 02:57
There isn't any.
August 04, 2017 at 02:44