You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

fdrake

Comments

I think we had interest, given that there were private discussions of issues raised on the forum between lurker-women and some of the staff. I suppose...
October 30, 2017 at 00:34
I've probably done it more times than I can count Wos, but I try hard not to use any of the implicit biases I have. I don't think the spirit of that m...
October 30, 2017 at 00:26
I used to administrate a reasonably large and active alt-left discussion forum. Besides people posting pictures of Mario-Stalin and those who were pro...
October 29, 2017 at 23:57
Fundamentally all of those terms, Gaussian curve, power law, fat tails and heavy tails, describe shapes of curves. The curves they describe are models...
October 29, 2017 at 17:59
You're describing two common symptoms of mood disorders and claiming that they're fundamental to depression; flattened affect, and inhibited prospecti...
October 28, 2017 at 22:13
One way of being persuasive is to provide a good explanation and be right!
October 27, 2017 at 17:49
Asking why something's right or wrong doesn't require believing in the necessary existence of a sufficient justification, only that to satisfy the que...
October 27, 2017 at 17:34
I've never understood why morality is the kind of thing that needs a ground or foundation. If you have an ethical system, it gets tested against intui...
October 27, 2017 at 14:18
Don`t see anything to pick at here. So long as the problem space for the demarcation of life and not-life is the space of possible genomic networks, r...
October 24, 2017 at 14:40
The nodes in neural networks are placed there by modellers and use a message passing algorithm to update parameters linking the nodes. The nodes in ge...
October 18, 2017 at 21:05
I'm not a biologist, and have only tertiary knowledge in developmental biology. For a specific gene network, precise estimation of parameters would be...
October 18, 2017 at 20:37
That's what I meant. Teleological language is useful to paraphrase stuff like that.
October 18, 2017 at 17:22
Responding with quote from a physicist friend: "I'm uncomfortable with science that deals with anything that isn't a state variable. (temperature, pre...
October 18, 2017 at 16:20
I remember how much you hate possible world semantics for modal logic, but I think some idea of possibility/necessity modality is useful here to sharp...
October 18, 2017 at 16:10
That a biological system doesn't contradict the laws of physics doesn't tell you much about the biological system. As you pointed out, stuff like air-...
October 18, 2017 at 14:48
@"Harry Hindu" Really? The types of question appropriate in biology are a lot different from the types in physics. There are differences on the entiti...
October 18, 2017 at 14:03
I think your OP's missing a step @"StreetlightX", you go straight from the influence of abiogenic factors on gene expression without mentioning their ...
October 18, 2017 at 13:43
I may have a few small problems with the methodology in the study - I need to close read it rather than skim to see what they're doing exactly with Pe...
October 16, 2017 at 10:48
Yeah, that was an attempt to show that applying Occam's Razor, under some arguably unreasonable constraints, gives theories which are more likely to b...
October 15, 2017 at 20:06
I think it might be illustrative to try to come up with a case where only Occam's Razor distinguishes between the accepted and unaccepted accounts. Im...
October 15, 2017 at 19:08
I don't think the filters by themselves are defeaters of the disembodied consciousness claim - it is possible that there are some testimonies which sa...
October 15, 2017 at 09:06
I hope it's allowed within the rules: there are a few posters on here that have a somewhat developed personal philosophy (@"apokrisis", Augustino, @"B...
October 14, 2017 at 01:11
Maybe this will move the discussion on a bit, @"Sam26", @"Michael Ossipoff" I thought of a way to better describe the scenario which would lead to an ...
October 14, 2017 at 00:53
I don't think that we'll make much more progress since we're at the stage of saying the other person has not answered previous points. I presented the...
October 13, 2017 at 23:15
I think the unintuitiveness of the quantitative behaviour of infinity is something isolated to the folk-mathematics idea of it. Infinity isn't just we...
October 13, 2017 at 20:38
I'm glad you agree that testimonial data which satisfies the criteria I outlined is rare. 4000 accounts quickly becomes a lot less when the data is fi...
October 13, 2017 at 20:26
Ascribing a probability to an arbitrary future or past event with no information at hand is impossible. It has to be done within a context to be meani...
October 13, 2017 at 16:52
Looking forward to it, it was a fun discussion before, should be again.
October 10, 2017 at 20:46
What denial? I just gave an example of an actually macroscopic scale quantum phenomenon. Regardless, people don't diffract through doors. The true pic...
October 10, 2017 at 19:51
I was expecting that response. The appropriate length scale is that of an electrical signal inducing a measurement in a quibit - a quantum state. That...
October 10, 2017 at 19:02
I think science outreach about quantum mechanics has been sensationalist. You see little bits of 'quantum weirdness' like entanglement and vague refer...
October 10, 2017 at 17:48
All of your threads are lists of questions that perplex you but which you assume are fundamental problems with contemporary physics. Is it then surpri...
October 10, 2017 at 13:10
Try this and then this for an introduction to how polarisation works.
October 10, 2017 at 12:59
Some solution attempts to Maxwell's Demon rely on a mathematical relationship between thermodynamic entropy and information entropy. So there's some p...
October 09, 2017 at 19:49
A reply to @"MikeL" and @"apokrisis" No worries. I wrote that post mostly to clear my own head and explore the ideas in the paper. I'm grateful to any...
October 09, 2017 at 19:39
Also @"apokrisis" and @"StreetlightX" for interest. As was pointed out in the previous thread you made on semiosis, one advantage of the Piercian view...
October 07, 2017 at 16:39
Sequences of divine entities are like the rationals, incomplete and thus irreal. *badumtisch*
October 04, 2017 at 21:27
Spheres aren't. Most human constructions aren't. Can you choose what to have for breakfast? Yes. Does the same effect usually follow cause in controll...
October 04, 2017 at 21:23
That's precisely what I intended. All of those words denote things which, at face value, exist in different ways.
October 04, 2017 at 17:24
That's ok, Ray Brassier is the usual answer. ;)
October 04, 2017 at 17:22
I think it's appropriate to imagine things into existence so long as there's not a unique sense of what it means to exist. EG, Gods are myths, chairs ...
October 04, 2017 at 06:01
Honestly I think the ambiguity in the domain of quantification is the essential feature of the argument. You want there to be a single way in which so...
October 04, 2017 at 05:42
@"Fuji" What got you interested in accelerationism?
October 03, 2017 at 23:07
I doubt there's any way to unambiguously evaluate which is the better choice. I've tried to come up with two 'recipes for deciding in an unambiguous w...
October 03, 2017 at 17:09
Have you considered starting a blog?
October 03, 2017 at 16:42
My favourite response to the ontological argument is an attack against the uniqueness of the entity it conjures into being. (1) An entity X has proper...
October 03, 2017 at 14:34
If: (1) Both accounts predict exactly the same bad things to happen. (2) All the predictions that each make will happen. (3) At least one of the accou...
October 02, 2017 at 14:26
Thank you very much.
October 01, 2017 at 19:29
Say you're measuring something's length. You make 10 measurements from a ruler whose smallest division is 1 mm. The measurements might be slightly dif...
October 01, 2017 at 18:33
Nutshell: If you have two variables - the mean of their sum is the sum of their means. If you have two variables with no correlation - the variability...
October 01, 2017 at 18:16