You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

fdrake

Comments

Let me try and formulate the converse then. 'I don't care about how to live ethically, I only care about what it means to live ethically'. Somewhat im...
November 10, 2017 at 17:16
I can imagine examples of how thinking in terms of consequences is different from thinking in terms of duties, but do you ever get any wisdom in how t...
November 09, 2017 at 23:23
I think you're interpreting my ire towards ethical systems as a kind of quietism towards them - that theory is irrelevant for motivating ethical decis...
November 09, 2017 at 18:53
It would be strange to love wisdom without trying to let that wisdom influence your actions, no?
November 09, 2017 at 17:30
That makes sense. Do you think being ethical is possible without this sense of doubt? I've met a few people who were convinced that they had good will...
November 09, 2017 at 15:04
I don't think your 'system' is one of the ones I'm trying to tar in this thread. It seems like a bunch of generalizations from difficult scenarios you...
November 09, 2017 at 14:55
I think something like this. All ethical inquiry consists in reasoning about what to do. This includes what it means to do something right (is this th...
November 09, 2017 at 13:35
Can you elaborate on the darkness? I don't understand the allusion. I suppose being able to negotiate is a presupposition of conflict resolution.
November 08, 2017 at 21:16
Bollocks. Whatever view you have that entails this contradiction should be discarded.
November 08, 2017 at 21:14
What's the difference?
November 08, 2017 at 21:03
Declaring something beyond philosophy, one must think both sides of the limit...
November 08, 2017 at 20:46
That's the kind of approach I was trying to promote. But I think there's some place for ethical systems. For example, if you're speaking with someone ...
November 07, 2017 at 22:13
Can you be more specific about how your system of values constrains the means you can use to achieve your ends? Regarding the independence of what's g...
November 07, 2017 at 22:02
In isolation, yes I think this is something that's ok. In principle, no, if a meta-ethics or normative ethics gives you no heuristics or ways of think...
November 07, 2017 at 17:28
Examples of how your ethical system has guided you towards certain actions concerning people?
November 07, 2017 at 16:11
If using ethical systems in your day to day life is an important part of ethical philosophy, it is a glaring omission that we speak about what structu...
November 07, 2017 at 16:03
Time is mysterious. Duration in every day contexts is not. It isn't as if the mysteries of time impede interpretation and calibration of watches. That...
November 07, 2017 at 15:16
They're almost certainly not independent lines of inquiry though. Do you think it would be normal for someone to study normative and meta-ethics all t...
November 07, 2017 at 15:12
Ok Wayfarer, I can see the link directly to 2. Someone who practices mindfulness or meditation is probably more able to deal with that, maybe also som...
November 07, 2017 at 08:40
A few examples would be nice. Say your friend turns up really late to a restaurant you're eating at, you can see they're a bit flustered and worried w...
November 07, 2017 at 08:07
I exempted you from it because, if I've understood your comments and some of your blog posts, you actually care about the description and structure of...
November 07, 2017 at 07:57
I don't think that people who have ethical systems or meta-ethical beliefs on the philosophy forum are hypocrites. What I'm criticizing is the idea th...
November 07, 2017 at 07:51
I made an effort to act less like a jackass when I was 21, it worked. Unfortunately maybe, but it did.
November 06, 2017 at 22:58
I used to get a thrill out of committing small social faux pas, I imagine they annoyed some people. My favourites were: (1) When someone asks you to g...
November 06, 2017 at 22:35
The kind of time we're talking about isn't some phenomenological or lived time, it's temporal duration. So: Ways of measuring duration - decided by co...
November 06, 2017 at 22:10
Since I couldn't do a text impression of Zizek with a link (sorry whatever mod deleted the post), he has an interesting view on love. At least romanti...
November 06, 2017 at 13:51
I don't have a problem. Was only asking for clarification.
November 05, 2017 at 22:55
Aight, I read the link, were you using it to say symmetry breaking is still a thing, contra the OP?
November 05, 2017 at 22:30
O I thought you were a staff. Sorry. But thanks!
November 05, 2017 at 22:29
What informed you about: amount of symmetry breaking is insufficient and lurked in the big bang, chiral symmetry breaking in the weak force through th...
November 05, 2017 at 21:46
Supporting links?
November 05, 2017 at 21:38
Or alternatively 'no reason to assume the universe is anything but a contingent accident'.
November 05, 2017 at 20:45
If, then at least until someone stops you.
November 05, 2017 at 20:43
Can you guys stop your bickering please. Neither of you is going to back down, neither of you is going to 'win', there's absolutely nothing at stake i...
November 05, 2017 at 19:26
What's the book?
November 04, 2017 at 12:29
Enjoying studying stats?
November 03, 2017 at 18:53
You're leveraging the principle of indifference to assign these probabilities, which is inappropriate without constraints on the situation. You also s...
November 02, 2017 at 22:25
You can ascribe a 50% chance to a conscious creator with blue hair, a 50% chance to a conscious creator with red hair, and a 50% chance to a conscious...
November 02, 2017 at 19:47
I'm gonna re-post something I did in your previous thread @"Marchesk", but will add to it. This is one of those philosophical issues that I don't see ...
November 02, 2017 at 16:19
@"unenlightened" fiddles while Rome burns.
November 01, 2017 at 20:45
This is one of those philosophical issues that I don't see the point in, but I don't think this is because of quietism, rather because I don't really ...
November 01, 2017 at 18:25
Thanks for the clarifications Tiff. I usually have difficulty telling parodies, sarcasm and ironic chatter from the real thing, so it was a request fo...
October 31, 2017 at 14:18
No Posty, if the system contained enough arithmetic it would still be subject to Godel's theorems.
October 31, 2017 at 01:35
It applies to any system that contains arithmetic. This is why it's so important. If you want a system to do maths in, it should definitely contain so...
October 31, 2017 at 00:09
I'm just going to leave the Painting Fool here. Neural nets can already learn ontologies (operational stratifications of concepts). It's probably bein...
October 30, 2017 at 23:09
If every atom of oxygen is equally likely to be drawn from a series of independent random draws, this implies that the probability of obtaining a part...
October 30, 2017 at 23:05
I don't know how the law of excluded middle relates to Godel's theorem, or how rejecting it relates to Godel's theorem. One way to find out how it rel...
October 30, 2017 at 22:53
I couldn't tell if that exchange between you both, @"ArguingWAristotleTiff", @"Sapientia" was sincere, camaraderie, camaraderie laced with poison or s...
October 30, 2017 at 22:48
I think @"andrewk" did a thread on the old forum going through Godel's original proof, so he might have some good input here. I have a hazy understand...
October 30, 2017 at 14:52
Makes sense. Doesn't it feel disappointing to you that 'the odds were in our favour', so to speak, but we still failed to have many active woman poste...
October 30, 2017 at 00:51