You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

Much of what you say is well-crafted, but then you write something such as this. Taking words as the names of ideas - "are these ideas the proper refe...
June 29, 2020 at 00:29
@"Metaphysician Undercover" has deified the individual. The prime commandment is that One must be kept whole. At the alter he sacrifices all of mathem...
June 29, 2020 at 00:15
The issue is, that's not were you start in philosophy, it's where you finish.
June 29, 2020 at 00:11
That's the one. Probably a Boomer thing. We have all the best music.
June 29, 2020 at 00:09
It's just that philosophy uses words, and hence philosophers take words seriously. Hence, starting with a definition is likely to be problematic, sinc...
June 29, 2020 at 00:04
I find what you said very hard to follow, but it seems that you are working with a theory of meaning that involves the coding of a private meaning in ...
June 28, 2020 at 23:54
:up: There's a philosophical approach that seeks to force a wedge between an inner self and an outer world, usually following this up with a diminutio...
June 28, 2020 at 23:35
Waiting for Godot was presented by the Lockdown Theatre Company last night; it was four in the morning here, a somehow apt time. A dreadful play, one ...
June 28, 2020 at 23:31
Who else can't read this without adding an emphatic shout of "Absolutely nothin'"? Good Lord!
June 28, 2020 at 23:22
I like your linked post. Not quite how I would phrase the issue, but we do overwhelmingly agree as to the facts; our disagreements being forced to the...
June 28, 2020 at 23:14
What does this mean? Are you saying that when you look at the quote above, you are not seeing the same thing as I see? But there is a clear sens ein w...
June 28, 2020 at 23:08
I am agnostic as well. The point I was making is methodological, in that insofar as god answered every question god is sufficient for us to divest our...
June 28, 2020 at 23:04
You're far too modest. Not everything you make up is shite.
June 28, 2020 at 22:43
https://i.pinimg.com/236x/96/44/e8/9644e82f37a35d8dd22c63c9311c5fd4--hamster-wheel-royalty-free-stock-photos.jpg
June 28, 2020 at 03:19
That seems to be the usage on Stanford and IEP, much as one ought not appeal to authority. It's the view that morality is merely the opinion of this o...
June 28, 2020 at 02:26
I don't know where to go with this. You've framed the discussion in terms of subjective/objective truths in morality, and I have shown that that disti...
June 28, 2020 at 01:51
Yeah, I disagree. If you deserve some specified consequence, then it is true that you deserve it. Nothng is gained by adding that you objectively dese...
June 28, 2020 at 01:37
Wishful thinking ...or just making shite up. :up:
June 28, 2020 at 01:23
The OP is arguing that relativism is muddled. I agree. Our discussions about the world would indeed be entirely meaningless if there was no truth. Tha...
June 28, 2020 at 01:21
That I prefer vanilla is justified subjectively. The answer to "why do you prefer vanilla" can be "I just do". Objective justifications can be contras...
June 28, 2020 at 01:16
The distinction between objective and subjective truth breaks down on analysis. What can be maintained is a distinction between objective and subjecti...
June 28, 2020 at 01:08
No, I removed a source of ambiguity. Edit: Cheers,
June 28, 2020 at 01:00
A zombie thread. Better to start a new topic. Who is being identified as a "PM poster" here?
June 28, 2020 at 00:49
So I'll answer my own question. It's truth that is important, not objectivity.
June 28, 2020 at 00:29
Quite the opposite. Scientists can do the predictions despite there not being a cause. The electron in a double split will go right or left with a 50%...
June 28, 2020 at 00:28
You do take things so personally. It's just that I don't see you post here are contributions to the topic. I'm giving you enough rope. Do with it as y...
June 27, 2020 at 23:57
Is this one of those "last post wins" things?
June 27, 2020 at 23:44
Mind your manners. No need for name-calling. Folk tend to assume causation as a hard-and-fast rule, which it isn't. First it is unclear what causation...
June 27, 2020 at 23:43
Taking your example, a discussion of Calvin's view of free will might take either of two paths. In one, it would be argued that it is true because the...
June 27, 2020 at 23:37
And hence, so far as I am aware, I haven't.
June 27, 2020 at 23:22
And yet you reply in my threads, not I in yours.
June 27, 2020 at 23:19
I've re-read this with eyes that are less wearied, but still think it muddled. Yes, i was thinking of omnipotent deities when I wrote the OP. But I do...
June 27, 2020 at 23:18
Seems this thread has had the unintended consequence of getting @"Gnostic Christian Bishop" banned. Result. Your damnation thread is at best borderlin...
June 27, 2020 at 23:14
In: Bannings  — view comment
Are there mods here who were mods in The Other Place? They might know more detail. I think that the main motivation from the mods perspective was not ...
June 27, 2020 at 22:59
In: Bannings  — view comment
Sure you did. :cool:
June 27, 2020 at 22:57
You went for the science; the ethics arm of the argument might have been more fun. I'll try to be clear. Science operates independently of religion, i...
June 27, 2020 at 22:56
In: Bannings  — view comment
Somethign similar was implemented in the previous incarnation of the forum. Roughly, folk could post to an equivalent of the lounge, that did not show...
June 27, 2020 at 22:37
In: Bannings  — view comment
Bring it.
June 27, 2020 at 22:29
I'll read your comments again tomorrow.
June 27, 2020 at 11:52
I'm becoming increasingly astonished that this thread continues. https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/586b1327bebafbc747451130/1507042827759-...
June 27, 2020 at 11:34
Notice that the OP says pretty much the same thing, even though I removed the word Objective. How's that?
June 27, 2020 at 11:28
What? Not following your post at all. I did not say that philosophers should not consider god.
June 27, 2020 at 11:23
Perhaps it is; but it is not so because it is the principle tenet of religion. If religion happens to be ethical, it's not because it is religion. Con...
June 27, 2020 at 10:00
They are? That wasn't intentional.
June 27, 2020 at 08:56
I've argued elsewhere against over-reliance on commencing with definition. it's often better to allow the definition to grow alongside the conversatio...
June 27, 2020 at 08:44
To be sure, the titles listed are examples to be discussed, not examples of what should be banned. And yes, the answer is not hard-and-fast. So take t...
June 27, 2020 at 08:16
In: Bannings  — view comment
Good. Nasty little troll.
June 27, 2020 at 07:50
In: Bannings  — view comment
So...are we panning theists?
June 27, 2020 at 07:50