180 Proof

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=keDpxp892Og "I Wish It Would Rain" (2:49) Wish It Would Rain, 1967 The Temptations * https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-Mk18...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6rwDjoaxAus "Rain" (3:02) The Beatles Rock Bank Custom DLC, 2020 writers Lennon-McCartney, 1966 The Beatles

:fire:

:fire: & D. Schweickart, R. Dahl, M. Bookchin ... Not just "ignorance" (inexperienced? uneducated? the illusion of knowledge?) ...

:smirk:

Perhaps eupraxia rather than episteme (of arete)? Reflective practice, not just "knowledge"? They seem a compatible, even complementary, quartet.

"Skeptical" of what? (Atheism?) :up: :fire:

My 2 drachmas:

Calling on @"Tobias" @"Maw" @"apokrisis" ...

I'm surprised there aren't more frequent micrometeor strikes on satellites and space craft given that the (inner) Solar System is a veritable debris f...

As I wrote in the post you only half-quoted: So if you still have to ask, baker ... :brow: Maybe so, but I neither claim nor implied it could be, so I...

If your quote of my post isn't clear enough, my apologies, Smith, but I can't make my meaning (& parentheticals) any clearer.

:up:

:up:

No doubt, words both of us can profit from in circumstances such as this ...

Your "students" have my sincerest sympathies. :lol:

:smirk:

:fire: :up:

(Re: ontological locality) :up:

So you can't refute Plato's reasoning for a tripart soul (i.e. divisible mind). Of course you can't; I just wanted to confirm that. Thanks, Bratshitz!...

:fire:

"There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning." ~Warren Buffet (2006) Interview 2015: htt...

Discontinuities (i.e. quanta).

:up: :clap: :sweat: How do you square "mind is not divisible" with Socrates'/Plato's idea (which is based on reason alone)? source: https://www.encycl...

Is it? I thought philosophy's about folly (i.e. being unwise) – how to reduce foolery, how to unlearn foolish habits. :chin:

No. Like I wrote, "equivalent to a tautology" (i.e. self-repetitive, lacks information) because a "rule without exception" is inapplicable (i.e. appli...

:up: Thanks for this! I'd never made this connection either. Taking both off the shelf now ...

A "rule without exception" is, ceteris paribus, equivalent to a tautology (i.e. inapplicable).

Wow! I'm sure I have heardn't this song since when it was new on my transistor AM radio at summer camp. :sparkle: :clap: Another oldie from that era ....

:100:

:fire:

:up: :clap:

That's a fair summary. :up:

:yawn:

:eyes: :sweat: Wtf, kid. Space "does not occupy space" and it's divisible above 1 planck length.

Pro tip: We live on the surface of the Earth which is not navigable body in space whereas astronauts live inside a navigable spaceship; ergo, inapt me...

Not at all. Dubious assumptions / distinctions simply undermined his conclusions (e.g. substance dualism, pineal gland, machine animals). Algebriac ge...

:ok: Nothing personal, just ... we disagree.

:up: Neither. IMO, a mind is an embodied, metacognitive process constituted by a system of hierarchically tangled (D. Hofstadter, T. Metzinger) cognit...

:roll: :ok:

Neither do I.

This deserves a savage beating! :brow:

:up:

If I understand you right, "the framework" is "validited" by the efficacy of (i.e. feedback from) C, which is external to "the framework", and not C i...

I'm not following you ...

3 does not follow from 1 or 2 because both are nonsense (i.e. circular definitions, not valid premises). I guess you're really really not as "smart" a...

I say no one exists without the living body. I may be wrong and you may be right. So refute my contention if you can – make the case: (A) How do "you"...

:flower:

:smirk: