You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Chany

Comments

Notice how we went from "the nature of God's plan is obscure to us" to "God must withhold knowledge from us in order to protect us". First, we must di...
February 16, 2017 at 02:12
http://www.iep.utm.edu/evil-evi/#SH3c Look at the skeptical theist responses and the replies to them (this particular analogy is not fully addressed, ...
February 15, 2017 at 17:15
First, we do not know how consciousness works. However, not understanding the perfect interworkings of something does not prevent up As to the general...
February 15, 2017 at 13:00
No arguments here.
February 15, 2017 at 03:28
What is the quantity of happiness, how do we go about measuring it, and how can we see the accuracy of quantification? Again, I feel no need to pull o...
February 15, 2017 at 03:26
[r But why? You have not provided evidence for this. All these words indicate is that we like making relationships between things. Saying, "I like hoc...
February 15, 2017 at 03:11
Which would you prefer: the life of 1) or the life of 2)? I prefer 1), and I would venture most would agree with me. Also, I do not like people using ...
February 15, 2017 at 01:27
Well, your English is a bit weird with odd sentence structures, so it is a bit hard to read. If you are arguing for hedonism, the maximization of plea...
February 14, 2017 at 06:16
I don't really see how the Democrats are going to pull out of this one. The problem is one of dissatisfaction. It doesn't matter how things go: Barack...
February 14, 2017 at 00:30
Or it could be that the ass cannot make a decision or its mind has a built-in deterministic way of dealing with situations like this. Trolley problems...
February 12, 2017 at 14:40
No, you have not. Read the replies again. They explain the issue the thought experiment brings up: how do we choose between two equal choices when we ...
February 11, 2017 at 16:25
What does that mean, particularly knowledge?
February 10, 2017 at 14:36
This is all about the definition of mind. If you define mind in as that of a human, then, obviously, animals do not have minds. However, this is nothi...
February 10, 2017 at 13:05
I just want to let you know that I have not had time to sit down and do a proper response. I still want to respond.
February 07, 2017 at 22:25
No. You are just making assertions that do not make sense with what we know about reality, as well things that don't make much sense. The only good id...
February 07, 2017 at 17:03
Perhaps my language was not the clearest. Allow me to explain. We start with meanings first, or the "content" of the word, before we get to the label....
February 07, 2017 at 00:17
I'm not entirely sure what your point is. Yes, if we called "blue" by another name or used "blue" to refer to something else than we usually use it, t...
February 06, 2017 at 14:24
Generally, the fact that people believe something is nuetral. It may, at best, serve as very minor evidence or an indication of something that require...
February 06, 2017 at 00:36
That's a discussion in itself. Each religion makes unique claims, so you would technically have to one by one and show how they are false (though you ...
February 05, 2017 at 17:03
If you can, try to find a book called Anarchy, State, and Utopia by Robert Nozick.The book is political and he argues for a libertarian minimal state,...
February 05, 2017 at 16:36
Utilitarianism is a system of morality. Classical utilitarianism claims that what is good ultimately comes down to what is pleasurable and what is bad...
February 05, 2017 at 15:10
For the observation of religious belief? Directly, people's beliefs. People believe that their religion is true, and they act on their beliefs. Even i...
February 05, 2017 at 14:34
What rules of logic did you use to get from 1) to 2)? They appear to be saying difference things. Statement 2 doesn't seem to make sense. Try rewritin...
February 04, 2017 at 19:18
The entire field of how we know is epistemology. This is a philosophical field all on its own and we can spend generations talking about it. I'm going...
February 04, 2017 at 18:58
My argument does not aim to disprove God, it aims to disprove the argument you presented: God exists because many humans worship God and follow the ru...
February 04, 2017 at 16:15
Sure, whatever. I'm going to go with the understanding of doctors and other medical scientists, who are aware that there are germs in the body that do...
February 04, 2017 at 15:11
I am accounting for those religious observations. I'm saying that the hypothesis you are arguing for is unfounded and that the explanation for the rel...
February 04, 2017 at 14:46
This is just my experience: people gifted or capable at one form of communication are not automatically capable in another medium of communication. Pe...
February 04, 2017 at 14:06
Perhaps I should note that there is nothing wrong with doing historical speculation. I was more replying towards people like @"m-theory" brought up, w...
February 04, 2017 at 04:52
Historical speculation on alternate histories beyond very immediate and obvious effects carries approximately the same weight as my friends and I argu...
February 04, 2017 at 03:06
Yes, there is. Atomic theory (which is technically a hypothesis or a series of hypotheses that can be falsified) requires that atoms, molecules, and t...
February 03, 2017 at 13:57
To emphasize, I'm not attacking the existence of God, I'm attacking the notion that people worshiping God and following the tenets of a religion is sc...
February 03, 2017 at 04:33
Can we test these interpretations, or, at the least, collect more data and evidence to further refine them? Science is not my field beyond some resear...
February 03, 2017 at 04:11
Paradoxes, like Zeno's, have potential answers. The point is to resolve the paradox by rejecting the premises. Zeno's paradox is not really a paradox ...
February 02, 2017 at 16:46
Correction: light is observed in experiments to behave as both a wave and a particle and we have found that applying light as both a particle and wave...
February 02, 2017 at 16:37
No. Logic is a systematic way of dealing with propositions and their truth value. You don't get to say a rule of logic is bad or a fallacy is good jus...
February 02, 2017 at 15:36
But, scientifically, they can't, as they are mutually exclusive hypotheses, as they make contradictory claims about God, what God is, and what God has...
February 02, 2017 at 15:32
Let's try something more direct. Which of the following do you believe: 1. Judaism 2. Christianity 3. Islam 4. Zoroastrianism 5. Other Theistic Belief...
February 02, 2017 at 14:49
I think the claim: only works if the rejection is on mechanical grounds alone. By inverse, this means that we cannot use arguments against physicalism...
February 02, 2017 at 14:35
Scientifically: If we can directly observe the entity, well, we can look for the actual entity itself. If I want to prove that there are sharks, I fin...
February 02, 2017 at 13:41
You have that intuition because, as I explained in my original reply, we are biologically programmed and/or socially conditioned to desire to respond ...
February 02, 2017 at 13:13
You keep saying that, but you never actually addressed a single one of my criticisms. I am addressing your conception of science. If you have a decent...
February 02, 2017 at 04:26
I do not really like using the word justice because of how closely related it is to feelings of revenge and vengeance. I prefer to think of justice as...
February 02, 2017 at 03:12
Again, I agree with that assessment to a degree. I find arguments directly confronting dualism that amount to "your metaphysics are weird and has myst...
February 02, 2017 at 03:02
Nitpick time: I don't think this is the scientific method at all. There has not been an establishment of how to falsify the hypothesis, why the observ...
February 01, 2017 at 22:27
I've appeared to have misunderstood your initial point. My bad.
February 01, 2017 at 15:15
I don't think this analogy potrays the entire picture. The total mind-body problem, at least as I was taught, contains four premises: (1) the mind is ...
February 01, 2017 at 14:03
You put the problem right there in the first sentence. You assume (hold to be true for no reason) that causality can only occur in space-time, which c...
February 01, 2017 at 12:04
I agree with you if we are talking generally, but people (in my experience, usually dualists) try to use their viewpoint on the mind to defend a viewp...
January 31, 2017 at 17:00
That very well maybe the case and I honestly think lines like this are worth talking about and arguing for. I actually am on the physicalist side. My ...
January 31, 2017 at 16:53