You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

god must be atheist

Comments

Now close your eyes and open your mouth wide, and try to figure out if there is any awkwardness in this opinion. Jokes aside: if the patient can live ...
February 11, 2021 at 04:29
Yes. All the time. Whether I follow your instructions or not.
February 11, 2021 at 04:23
The potency is there. The capacity to do so. The ability to do so. Yes, god can create a stone that he can't lift. Can he? Let's suppose that he can. ...
February 04, 2021 at 23:35
I find no unintelligibility about "god is capable of creating a stone he can't lift" if it comes to his power of creation. I find no unintelligibility...
February 04, 2021 at 23:18
People here haven't heard what my grade 6 classmates back then 50-60 years ago were saying: If god is omnipotent, he can create a stone so heavy that ...
January 30, 2021 at 00:39
the chain does not need a starting point. The proof does not state it, but it assumes that everyone will agree that it has a starting point necessaril...
January 29, 2021 at 02:58
I have no understanding of what you could possibly mean. Contingent means "pending on the outcome of independent events". This 1) is incomprehensible ...
January 29, 2021 at 02:48
why would they be better at anything, if they are the same as us?
January 29, 2021 at 02:42
This is the faulty logic, or rather, the incorrect observation, or incorrect interpretation of theory, that you use as a premis for your thesis. If th...
January 29, 2021 at 02:35
That's just it, HarryHindu. You equate the two: conceptual thought and dots a scribbles. That is, if I may make this observation, your mistake in your...
January 29, 2021 at 02:26
There are two perfect questions. Distinct and uniqe. 1. What has been the stupidest question anyone has ever asked you? 2. Do you want to make out aft...
January 27, 2021 at 23:35
you are absolutely right. I don't see any point in your objection. If you insist on equating conceptual thought to dots and scribbles, and you deny th...
January 27, 2021 at 23:25
There are a lot of people on the forum who are introspective, immersed in deep thought or else soaring with the eagles in pinnacles of sacrosanct trut...
January 27, 2021 at 03:10
A priori proofs or truths don't need justification by observation, but they do need a sentient being with powers of reason, which in our experience co...
January 27, 2021 at 03:03
I will answer your interesting objection, HarryHindu, I'm not avoiding, it, it's just not convenient for me to think right now for a few days.
January 26, 2021 at 22:35
Some famous dude said, "Love is the pleasant interval between meeting a beautiful girl, and realizing she looks like a haddock." I am not plagiarizing...
January 24, 2021 at 01:47
Yes. I keep repeating that you are repeating yourself saying that I'm repeating myself.
January 24, 2021 at 01:44
Agrippina's trilemma: it seems to be a reasoning, which tackles the a posteriori knowledge with a priori tools, and shows its points that way. A brill...
January 24, 2021 at 01:35
Lot of talk to refute the reason's power to defeat the values found by using reason. There are two kinds of truths: a priori and a posteriori. The fir...
January 23, 2021 at 18:42
I like this trilemma thing. I am indebted to you, PfHorrest, for enlightening me. I don't think it has a refutation. But it does not need a fefutation...
January 23, 2021 at 04:16
You just keep repeating yourself, as if you couldn't get out of the groove you feel comfortable in. There is no progression here; I refute you, you re...
January 22, 2021 at 04:59
Looked up The Trilemma. It's an economic theory. That is not quite the same as philosophy.
January 22, 2021 at 04:48
Erm... I don't think philosophy is based on axioms. Argumenting is based on assumptions or else on premises. Math is based on axioms, and math is a br...
January 22, 2021 at 04:45
Thanks, jgill, for your good wishes for me.
January 21, 2021 at 00:15
My advice: read them in alphabetical order. Makes referring to the content much easier that way.
January 21, 2021 at 00:11
This just begs another can of worms to be opened: Is awareness possible without self-awareness, or conciusness? You say it is only one factor, but do ...
January 20, 2021 at 23:10
There is a problem with your use of the verb tenses that suggest too much logic. You look at the present giving too much strength to statics, and too ...
January 20, 2021 at 22:51
This assumes that the hard question of free will has a resounding "yes" as to its existence.
January 19, 2021 at 16:33
It might be. For all I know.
January 19, 2021 at 16:29
Bot does not necessarily need to do a forceful action like saving your life to make you love it. As an autistic kid, I was in close emotional ties wit...
January 19, 2021 at 16:27
It hears the space bar's screaming of pain. Or did you mean when you walk into a bar on Pluto.
January 19, 2021 at 01:20
I'm at my wit's end in trying to publish something in an academic journal. I gave myself one more chance. If it does not work out, then I'll present i...
January 19, 2021 at 01:18
Joining late, and I'll prove it to you. (That I'm joining late.) I always answer the OP. Not the issue of the side-track. Calling physical laws and hu...
January 19, 2021 at 01:13
I wonder if those molecules with some sort of consciousness have philosophical discussions on to what part of them, and how their consciousness connec...
January 19, 2021 at 00:37
Leona, what about the person who has never thought of his life in terms of "what is the meaning of my life", or even more basically, he never thought ...
January 18, 2021 at 01:11
I've forgotten the feeling of missing the lack of lacking something.
January 17, 2021 at 14:29
Some ideas that REALLY ought not to be tolerated: - eating babies - performing scientific experimental surgery on unwilling living people without anes...
January 17, 2021 at 14:17
Sometimes it's the lack of lacking something.
January 17, 2021 at 12:49
Thanks for making sense of the OP. I see the script describe facts in a believable fashion. My only objection is that (1) nepotism is renamed neo-feud...
January 15, 2021 at 12:22
Image a world without time. You have five minutes to get it done.
January 15, 2021 at 11:58
I'd like us to consider that solipsism is not valid. Without that assumption the following will be meaningless. Belief is a probability knowledge. You...
January 14, 2021 at 23:47
I stand corrected as charged. I am functionally illiterate, not blind. For your information. I lived in a country where the proletarian revolution was...
January 14, 2021 at 23:22
I'd like to hear the argument in no more than seven sentences for each point. I don't have patience to read an entire book that has only two or three ...
January 14, 2021 at 23:11
Sorry, I forgot racism and Frankfurt Schoolism in the list.
January 14, 2021 at 23:07
Right. The new left ruined everything, by way of showing and advocating the ending of the complete oppression the ruling class had on the not-so-rulin...
January 14, 2021 at 23:05
There is no name like "new left" left. It left with the one thing or person that took it as you say. We're here, left behind, not knowing which way to...
January 14, 2021 at 23:01
How do we know these women on the photo are social democrats? To me they seem the exact same bunch that was the spill-over from the last wife-swapping...
January 14, 2021 at 22:53
In: Bannings  — view comment
In a way all counter-arguments are complaints. In a way. In fact, if anyone says anything, they want to make a point; which point is different how the...
January 14, 2021 at 00:23
In: Bannings  — view comment
Re: Boobs. I told my friend Paul how I used to be active on this site. He said, "So you discuss that if the Earth was a breast, where its nipple would...
January 14, 2021 at 00:16
In America... facts are just a fantasy. Numbers are a mystery. Reason is a miracle. Logic is the devil himself.
January 08, 2021 at 02:42