You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Streetlight

Comments

You're simply collapsing knowledge, intention, and action into one big blob. There things are not the same, and it is not very useful to treat them as...
August 15, 2019 at 17:55
I don't believe I have, and furthermore, whether or not we do or do not have responsibility is not very relevant. The question is over what responsibi...
August 15, 2019 at 17:37
Like I said to someone else, this isn't a debate over intention. -- Also, Butler's just a good old fashioned lesbian. The discussion of her title isn'...
August 15, 2019 at 16:47
Probably, but then, if you were to read past my click-baity OP title, you'd know I'd laugh along too.
August 15, 2019 at 16:41
Andrew Culp - Dark Deleuze (meh) Jane R. Goodall - The Politics of the Common Good: Dispossession in Australia Slavoj Zizek - Organs Without Bodies: D...
August 15, 2019 at 15:10
Stronger than this: 'need not' implies an option. I'm saying this is a matter of principle, of necessity: we are only responsible to the degree that w...
August 15, 2019 at 13:56
As are horseshoes, which are not made any which way.
August 15, 2019 at 13:16
In: Hong Kong  — view comment
This is one of the few clear instances where a politics of 'identity' is clearly not in any way at stake: there is no question here of 'identifying' w...
August 15, 2019 at 10:04
I wouldn't say that 'intention' is at stake here, or at least I don't think intention is coextensive with control. What I'm trying to argue for is rat...
August 15, 2019 at 05:28
Psychoanalysis is now so diffuse among contemporary theory that if you don't find 'post-Lacanians' or 'post-Freudians' it's because the use of psychoa...
August 14, 2019 at 02:56
In: Hong Kong  — view comment
The Hong Kong protestors are democratic heros, actual, real life superheroes, and what they're doing may just be the last gasp of democracy anywhere i...
August 13, 2019 at 17:48
It's a lovely phrase right? I borrowed it from Merleau-Ponty, who uses the language of the hollow in a different context (for him, we are hollows in t...
August 13, 2019 at 08:47
We can call it accountability instead if you prefer, and keep responsibility for causal attributions. In any case it's not the latter idea I'm concern...
August 12, 2019 at 14:32
Not at all. We regularly distinguish between those (held) responsible for their actions and those not, if by means of age, mental capacity, or otherwi...
August 12, 2019 at 14:21
Hello! Sorry for the late reply, I wrote the OP at the airport before a weekend trip, which is a terrible idea, but I'm back so better late than never...
August 12, 2019 at 13:23
Reader here! General responses to your smattering of questions: I've been hovering around 50 books per year recently, though I've been a bit behind th...
August 12, 2019 at 09:10
Yes. Glorious :D
August 09, 2019 at 20:04
I think the point is that the two are consubstantial: there is no responsibility for without responsibility to: as she says, the entire 'problem of re...
August 09, 2019 at 04:32
The Stoics are more subtle than might first appear - recall the story Epictetus tells of Priscus' response to Vespasian, when Vespasian threatens to k...
August 09, 2019 at 03:29
Maybe, maybe not, but your standard is as arbitrary as any so far.
August 08, 2019 at 18:07
One imagines that stochastic terrorism just happens, out of the blue, for no particular reason at all. What a mystery!
August 08, 2019 at 13:13
Yes, because that's the only possible way anyone could be held responsible, to whatever extent, for another. Worth noting too that the idea that cause...
August 08, 2019 at 13:11
Almost as funny as attributing words to quotes that weren't there to begin with.
August 08, 2019 at 12:27
This is a tortured and spurious distinction. Moreover, there is no question of 'taking back power' over words; one of the ways we exercise our powers ...
August 08, 2019 at 11:13
I quite like this vocabulary of 'inducing a sortal on the environment': I read it as a way (at a first approximation) of qualifying causality. So rath...
August 08, 2019 at 09:01
Natasha Lennard - Being Numerous: Essays on Non-Fascist Life Eleanor Kaufman - Deleuze, The Dark Precursor: Dialectic, Structure, Being
August 08, 2019 at 08:03
This doesn't follow and is also really dumb on the face of it. "X is really, really important, which is why we should under no circumstances, in any w...
August 08, 2019 at 06:51
'Control?' Like one 'controls' a toy car? That's not how the power of speech operates - at least not except under the most restricted and terrible con...
August 08, 2019 at 05:56
Not to be crass but this is almost laugh out loud funny. "Can you imagine if other people's speech were to be influences on other people? My gosh, no,...
August 08, 2019 at 05:06
It's always kinda funny to watch Americans suckling at the teet of their daddies. Sorry, 'founding daddies'. 'What would daddy think of this?!' being ...
August 08, 2019 at 04:11
OP is a muddle. If it can't be clarified this thread will be closed.
August 07, 2019 at 12:31
My friend, you need to read some economic anthropology, and see how all these priciples play out in real life. The attempt to measure policy and socie...
August 07, 2019 at 03:08
I was just thinking of mentioning how incredibly anemic this kind of libertarian political ontology is: the only actors that exist are 'free individua...
August 07, 2019 at 02:31
"An existing political reality ought to be altered irregardless of existing political realities". That's how dumb you sound.
August 07, 2019 at 02:27
Because you're not particularly bright.
August 07, 2019 at 02:06
Better than thinking something justifies itself by its mere existence.
August 07, 2019 at 02:04
It's ridiculous isn't it? Germany under Hitler was a fascist state, so that complete state control is justified because that's just how it was organiz...
August 07, 2019 at 02:01
Hate speech must die.
August 06, 2019 at 17:11
Here's what I think is at stake here (let me know if it's different): are you trying to account for the autonomy of systems without at the same time t...
August 06, 2019 at 09:50
Start your own thread.
August 06, 2019 at 06:24
The question of the OP is in the title. Seems like we both agree the answer is in the affirmative.
August 06, 2019 at 06:22
Weather or not the US is or is not a union of states says nothing to whether the current set-up of state representation is democratically representati...
August 06, 2019 at 06:09
So it's sheer existence justifies itself? Are you even trying?
August 06, 2019 at 06:05
Yes, and the point is that the current set-up of 'state representation' is itself not representative of the nation - that is, is undemocratic. Saying ...
August 06, 2019 at 05:46
Lol, you think the job of a representative democracy is to represent governments.
August 06, 2019 at 05:40
It's depressingly hilarious to read responses here which blame the people for not being good enough for their democracy. As for the semantic dodge tha...
August 06, 2019 at 03:15
I should note that the feeling of being overwhelemed is not necessarily a bad thing. That feeling can be a drive, a pulsion that motivates you forward...
August 06, 2019 at 00:32
He didn't say you have to study all of it; just that you ought to know more than nothing about it. So some of it will do. Will try listen to the podca...
August 05, 2019 at 14:06
Welcome to the site! You're asking an important set of questions, and what I say won't answer them directly so much as maybe help relieve the pressure...
August 05, 2019 at 14:04
It is unrepresentative swill. But a specific discussion is beyond this thread.
August 05, 2019 at 05:36