You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Emptyheady

Comments

Sure Zzz. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2z-OLG0KyR4 Checkmate!
January 20, 2017 at 23:12
God no. Think about what "wealth" means -- without equivocating. How it is calculated/determined. Everybody assumes the colloquial terminology, which ...
January 19, 2017 at 20:46
Ah this one is an absolute gem. Every time someone brings this up, you know they have zero interest in understanding a complex phenomenon such wealth ...
January 19, 2017 at 20:30
None of what I said are insults. It is a simple observational fact having read your post. You show a lack of understanding in economics. Have you hear...
January 19, 2017 at 20:14
Because those in power have a better understanding of economics than a random forum dweller spouting out some Marxist's flavoured dystopia, who thinks...
January 19, 2017 at 17:14
Rachel, this is called laziness. Ambition is pointless without discipline.
January 13, 2017 at 13:35
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtS2Ikk7A9I
January 13, 2017 at 13:24
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIesCd4I4hU
January 13, 2017 at 13:23
Drugs languish mental coherency and distort brain functions in arbitrary (often pleasurable) ways. There is no wisdom in drugs. Objectively speaking r...
January 11, 2017 at 16:26
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByC8sRdL-Ro
January 10, 2017 at 11:39
We should stop here, before we all get https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypochondriasis
January 10, 2017 at 11:30
Tinnitus is hell. My greatest nightmare. I saw a documentary where a woman committed suicide (with professional assistance) because the suffering was ...
January 10, 2017 at 01:28
>Understands that the nature of the discussion is descriptive ethics >Discusses metaethics ?_?
January 09, 2017 at 22:49
In: Hello!  — view comment
Colour texts, personalised themes, the threads are much clearer structured as my scope of interest is quite limited regarding philosophy -- but I actu...
January 09, 2017 at 17:57
Your reply did not give the impression you do.
January 09, 2017 at 17:48
Desire is innate and is not a choice, nor can it be eradicated -- at best suppressed with some nasty unforeseen side effects. This is why I think Budd...
January 09, 2017 at 17:04
In: Hello!  — view comment
A traditional forum has more options, but I am getting used to this minimalistic forum design.
January 09, 2017 at 16:47
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descriptive_ethics
January 09, 2017 at 01:58
Empirical evidence, moral views differs by location, time, religions, cultures, countries, etcetera -- to the point that moral relativism is the most ...
January 09, 2017 at 01:42
"Robert Wright" He keeps trying to push this nonsense through. Two things: (1) Moral descriptively, I think relativism is true. I do not believe in a ...
January 09, 2017 at 01:07
In: Hello!  — view comment
Welcome lad. Same here, but it may be just bias against any change -- eventually you will get used to it.
January 08, 2017 at 18:56
I am guilty as well. I will try to behave. :-x
January 08, 2017 at 14:10
My reply had nothing to do with sex, I actually forgot the topic of debate until he mentioned it again. Fine... It is an obvious fact that we are sexu...
January 07, 2017 at 03:44
I can not see how I have possibly implied that. I say that Buddhists attempt something that is fundamentally impossible and cover it with a mix of sop...
January 07, 2017 at 01:49
(It sucks that the old PF is dysfunctional, because I have criticised Eastern Philosophy before but I can’t find the post) It is not the case that a c...
January 07, 2017 at 01:29
Is it? I usually accuse the progressive leftist of being so god damn prude... Sex is a normal part of life but I get what you mean, it feels intrusive...
January 06, 2017 at 16:03
I don't miss the point at all, I know exactly what you are saying, but your left wing bias shines through, to the point that you immediately shut off ...
January 05, 2017 at 15:54
Yes, I addressed that exactly. Again, what I said to Benkei goes for you as well.
January 03, 2017 at 22:42
It is by definition... "In Hardin's classic piece "The Tragedy of the Commons," a commons is a natural resource shared by many individuals. In this co...
January 03, 2017 at 21:19
I concede that that is indeed tricky and there is more to it, but those indicators are quite telling measurements. Hitchens' take took me by surprise....
January 03, 2017 at 16:57
Yes. It is the tragedy of communal/common ownership of resources. That is pretty much the definition of it.
January 03, 2017 at 16:52
Yeah, same goes for you what I said to Benkei.
January 03, 2017 at 16:51
Yeah I never said that...They are not unrelated, what I said is, 'do not conflate them'. You tend to project things on me that I never said. The possi...
January 03, 2017 at 16:49
Yeah, I mean indications of human flourishing. Human flourishing is more complex.
January 03, 2017 at 16:16
Imo human flourishing. Quantifiable: reduction in violence (e.g. rates of homicides and rape), poverty and all its aspects (e.g. death by starvation, ...
January 03, 2017 at 16:01
Now this is funny, in order to safe face, you are straw-manning me? Where did I say it was the only one? "a solution" and somehow you pretended I said...
January 03, 2017 at 15:55
https://i.imgur.com/s463v1yh.jpg Honestly, take 10 minutes -- it is not hard to understand its workings -- to read it up and then come back and have a...
January 03, 2017 at 15:40
*sighs* It is really time that most of you open a book about economics... "The tragedy of the commons is a very real economic issue where individuals ...
January 03, 2017 at 15:24
http://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/43543 :-}
January 03, 2017 at 15:15
First of all, climate change has become a religion. It is full of left wing bias. But let's assume that it is true for the moment. Like Hans Rosling s...
January 03, 2017 at 14:59
Y'all need to open a book about economics. Tragedy of commons is a fundamental problem of non-private property -- it is a tragedy of communal ownershi...
January 02, 2017 at 20:22
Do you understand proportionality? This is how all rates of crime work.
January 02, 2017 at 18:32
The data speaks for itself really: https://ourworldindata.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/ourworldindata_share-of-violent-deaths_prehistoric-archeologi...
January 02, 2017 at 18:23
Agustino, I have read Pinker's work and his massive data collection and reasoning are quite solid. I am generally an optimist. https://www.youtube.com...
January 02, 2017 at 18:00
Have you read some of Haidt's stuff? I score more as a libertarian than a social conservative on his tests. That is probably because my form of social...
January 02, 2017 at 01:12
This one was really tough, I voted for Hume out of personal preference, but seeing Kant at top seems justified.
January 01, 2017 at 19:54
Karl Marx.
January 01, 2017 at 19:52
"Chomsky" (again) lol what am I missing, is this some kind of a cheeky meme I am missing?
December 30, 2016 at 03:33
Chomsky is not a philosopher.
December 29, 2016 at 17:45
Probably Religion and Rational Theology.
December 29, 2016 at 16:07