You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Rank Amateur

Comments

In: Morality  — view comment
Sorry the delay - real life got in the way What I would say is joe has no right to make any kind of value judgment about bob preference at all and sti...
March 13, 2019 at 23:30
In: Morality  — view comment
ok - can you try it one more time in a complete though ?
March 13, 2019 at 21:18
In: Morality  — view comment
how can one relative judgement be better than another relative judgment - by definition they are equal - they can only be unequal if there is some obj...
March 13, 2019 at 21:17
In: Morality  — view comment
we are talking past each other - i don't feel you understand the point I am making - I am very sure that is my fault - but I am out of ways to explain...
March 13, 2019 at 21:15
In: Morality  — view comment
can't play these word games with you. I have restated the concept like 4 times to you - i can't do it any better sorry - I am out of other ways to say...
March 13, 2019 at 21:12
In: Morality  — view comment
I think competing stances between moral relativists are on completely equal ground - by definition
March 13, 2019 at 21:11
In: Morality  — view comment
i have no issue with that at all - but the relative art critic must accept relative judgment of other relative art critics
March 13, 2019 at 21:09
In: Morality  — view comment
no i am only dealing with relative morality - the whole point is how a moral relativist interacts with a moral view different than his own. Nothing in...
March 13, 2019 at 21:07
In: Morality  — view comment
no issue with that - if as equal moral relativists we accept each others relative moral judgments. If that is what you are saying.
March 13, 2019 at 21:04
In: Morality  — view comment
no - we are not understanding each other - my point has nothing at all with objective morality at all - you are assuming something I am not saying.
March 13, 2019 at 21:02
In: Morality  — view comment
So where is the line between "any ultimate, universal, god-given grounding of truth, moral or otherwise, is not possible," and "within specific contex...
March 13, 2019 at 21:00
In: Morality  — view comment
running out of language here To Moral relativist A - action X is immoral To Moral relativist B - action X is moral If morality is relative to the indi...
March 13, 2019 at 20:54
In: Morality  — view comment
In my mind, i am not arguing about the merits of one moral philosophy over another - which is what I think you are doing above. No issue with that at ...
March 13, 2019 at 20:31
In: Morality  — view comment
I am not sure it is even consistent for a moral relativist to have any view on the moral view of others, other than " I am not them -how can i judge t...
March 13, 2019 at 20:20
In: Morality  — view comment
Have no difficulty with a view of moral relativity where each person feels the stance is morally right and the other stance is not. My point is i don'...
March 13, 2019 at 20:14
In: Morality  — view comment
Ok - and I then can have the same view back at you. That you are then equally wrong and different, and I am of course right about that relative to me.
March 13, 2019 at 19:37
In: Morality  — view comment
So than do you tell me - that my moral judgement is wrong? Or different ?
March 13, 2019 at 19:32
In: Morality  — view comment
so if you are a moral relativist, and I am a moral relativist, can we both have different moral judgments on some action, and agree the other judgemen...
March 13, 2019 at 19:24
In: Morality  — view comment
certainly not the last time that will happen -
March 13, 2019 at 19:01
In: Morality  — view comment
The issue I was pointing to is not that the moral relativist shouldn't care, but why would he comment. My understanding of moral relativism would be s...
March 13, 2019 at 18:45
In: Morality  — view comment
I think i see your point - What i was asking was - If Tim Wood's point was IF you are a moral relativist ( either a meta or normative one), then how c...
March 13, 2019 at 18:37
In: Morality  — view comment
If point was, why should we care about the opinion about morality - from a moral relativist, if he him/herself's core belief is the position only appl...
March 13, 2019 at 15:10
Thanks enjoyed the review, and will look into the book. Agree of course. I think the popular atheism in the article is a somewhat real product of a mo...
March 13, 2019 at 14:11
NOW GET OFF OF MY LAWN !!!!
March 12, 2019 at 18:51
not sure it was you point, but people believe things all the time without empirical proof - sometimes despite empirical proof We believe the guy drivi...
March 12, 2019 at 18:19
The base debate at the creation of the US was the role/power of the the Central government in relation to the power of the individual states. The crea...
March 12, 2019 at 12:24
A post from yesterday on a different thread. IMO the application of science - Technology - is driven by inherently human drives - mostly power and mon...
March 12, 2019 at 12:19
no worries -
March 11, 2019 at 17:57
agree - but can you reconcile your answer above, with the point you made to ? By saying this: Your mistake is confusing physical scale for our positio...
March 11, 2019 at 16:42
What is your reasonable argument that you can have any idea at all where we as human beings stand on such a thing as a scale of knowledge - with zero ...
March 11, 2019 at 16:32
IMO the application of science - Technology - is driven by inherently human drives - mostly power and money - but occasionally and to a lesser degree ...
March 11, 2019 at 15:22
yea - agree not sure the concept summarizes very well. And I find it a very difficult and slow read. But i will take a pass at it. by " absolute and l...
March 11, 2019 at 15:14
have no issue in general with your point - but language like this is pejorative and IMO should be avoided.
March 11, 2019 at 14:31
Thanks - again not sure i did a very good job of explaining Rahner's point - sorry the long cut and paste - but thought I would put a more professiona...
March 11, 2019 at 14:28
Will have to respectfully disagree, hope someday to elevate to work in progress, but not there yet. Appreciate the kind words - thank you
March 11, 2019 at 12:59
thanks - i think what Rahner was saying is, it is a part of human nature to seek for this meaning, for some explanation of why we are here, and and fo...
March 11, 2019 at 12:43
just making a joke, Camus- absurd- get it ?
March 10, 2019 at 21:23
Been looking at some Karl Rahner writing last few days. So in speaking to a person who claimed they had never experienced God. "I don’t believe you; I...
March 10, 2019 at 20:23
completely agree, I get narcissistic, egomaniacs exist, the fact that otherwise normal people voted and after all this, continue to support one for PO...
March 10, 2019 at 15:38
didn't read all of that, but guess I agree. Just kidding of course. I do agree in general with all of that. I do find some Gish gallop posts here, and...
March 10, 2019 at 15:29
Often I wonder if my reply to someone was actually read. Seems every so often they are more scaned than read. Looking for some word steam in them to b...
March 10, 2019 at 12:23
thanks will do
March 10, 2019 at 01:36
All - sorry all the misspellings it is Rahner, no particular good excuse, mea culpa
March 09, 2019 at 14:11
Jake - sorry this took so long. Maybe the best I have seen on this point is from Karl rathner he refers to God as Mystery, a mystery we are inherently...
March 09, 2019 at 12:37
he didn't count himself as an existentialist either
March 05, 2019 at 20:54
Here is the full quote: "THERE is but one truly serious philosophical problem, and that is suicide. Judging whether life is or is not worth living amo...
March 05, 2019 at 19:48
So if I use your number line above . . . -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3, +4 Lets set the big bang at 0, and call it T0. So right now there is near unan...
March 05, 2019 at 19:15
could quite possibly be the best single quote about science i have read on the board.
March 05, 2019 at 15:09
yes and every other theory in physics you have heard is an approximation of reality by definition. At the core all physics is is a mathematical model ...
March 05, 2019 at 15:04
actually all physics is, at its core, is a mathematical model of some reality or observation. Which then allows you to change the variables and make p...
March 05, 2019 at 14:57