You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

lll

Comments

If memory serves, Dawkins almost used a title like that. The 'altruism' of the individual gene-carrying organism (the greenbeards) is the 'selfishness...
March 16, 2022 at 05:58
First, for context, I'm a moderate on this issue. Language is a huge part of human reality. We live together in something like a historically and symb...
March 16, 2022 at 05:55
Indeed. Math is arguably a less impressive product of abstraction from a far richer linguistic ability, like bony driftwood next to a living tree. It'...
March 16, 2022 at 05:40
Well put.
March 16, 2022 at 04:52
This is a just an analogy, but it'll help me make my point perhaps. Let's imagine 'mind' and 'matter' as - \infty and + \infty respectively. Then our ...
March 16, 2022 at 04:50
Perhaps you are being unfair to Dawkins. The selfishness of genes is just an anthropomorphic trope for self-replicating pieces of code that don't care...
March 16, 2022 at 04:34
OK, perhaps. But will one of them speak up?
March 16, 2022 at 04:17
To me that's only plausible 'in the limit.' The costs are relatively 'infinitesimal' but nevertheless positive. Imagine two programs using the 'same' ...
March 15, 2022 at 07:58
Who was that fool officer who goddess chews dunk in the mud ? Or was it a bottle-bested beetle ? Shall we tank away his budge? (We did muck a mash of ...
March 15, 2022 at 07:32
If an unfair god is unworthy of worship, and this fairness is our human concept, then it's our own human virtues we worship. We can cut out the muddle...
March 15, 2022 at 07:07
You might come off as ego-centric, but what ambitiously creative philosopher is not? You might come off as accidentally aggressive by harping on the S...
March 15, 2022 at 06:56
But where are such rascals hiding ? Will anyone here defend that claim? It's so loopy to see nothing 'non-physical' in reality that misunderstanding i...
March 15, 2022 at 06:39
Yes, slur. Lag a toe shed to fire ah bend knot over thong goose. Agreed.
March 15, 2022 at 06:29
I very much appreciate the kind and encouraging words. Till necks time, friend.
March 14, 2022 at 08:26
Ha. To be sure, conflict has its germs.
March 14, 2022 at 08:22
Thanks! Old Wet-gun-sign talked about a philosophy made of jokes, and I think word play can just maybe show wet cannot be sad.
March 14, 2022 at 08:20
To be frank and fair, I've enjoyed posts by both of you, so the misunderstanding seems unfortunate and is hopefully temporary. But I couldn't help lau...
March 14, 2022 at 08:18
I think the bolded statement is correct and important. The first statement might admit some exceptions, but one must allow for the ineluctable ambigui...
March 14, 2022 at 08:16
Beautiful word, friend. You squeezed 'anon' in there, which makes 'beating the gross off with a stink' even creakier. There's also an 'on and on I' hi...
March 14, 2022 at 08:02
Gott could arguable decide that there was no best time and that the decision was of no importance. Perhaps he used an informagical going flip to decid...
March 14, 2022 at 07:57
Joyce's Book of the Dark : Finnegans Wake John Bishop Strong start so far, different emphasis than my other books on FW. James Joyce Richard Ellman 'R...
March 14, 2022 at 07:48
Critics of the game are still players, no? It's the game of getting beyond mirror games. The future isn't what it youth to be.
March 14, 2022 at 07:21
Tanquam ex ungue leonem ? 'The goes was mud of words.' Hamlet's paw was poisoned through the ere (promise creamed.)
March 14, 2022 at 07:03
Contrast whatever it is with the false epistemological modesty of a camouflaged evangelist who 'nose wets' at the End and not the And of inquiry.
March 14, 2022 at 06:55
Don't forget the forging of and the foraging for such claims. Consider your own claim above.
March 14, 2022 at 06:52
Such 'Materialism' looks like a bogyman to me. A few are still gettable who'll put on the cape and horns for a laugh or in a fit of sentimental nostal...
March 14, 2022 at 06:47
Is it not wise to abandon the muck of a dialogue made mostly obsolete precisely by and within that 'wary' dialogue? The 'soak' puppet battle of 'mound...
March 14, 2022 at 06:36
Greetings. I do not think you are nutty, sir. A bit knotty perhaps. The 'informagical' barb was lobbed not at old time religion but at a more sophisti...
March 14, 2022 at 06:26
I try and these days mostly succeed at finding the sacred in the dear dirty daily details. If we can't have (or deny ourselves the pleasure of having ...
March 14, 2022 at 05:59
Possibly. (I see what you are getting at, but I've learned (with difficulty) to be wary of dragging in foggy grammatical habit as ethereally hyper-log...
March 14, 2022 at 05:56
Does 'reality' have an exact, context-independent meaning? Is such a situation even possible? (And what exactly do I mean by 'possible'?)
March 13, 2022 at 16:38
In: Sophistry  — view comment
The problem seems to be that sophistry is always something they do. We of course are rational and clean and nice and good.
March 13, 2022 at 16:38
Half the time it seems to be about religion and anti-religion. The other half of the time it seems to be about either taking a side in a venerable if ...
March 13, 2022 at 16:38
Affirmative. Ten four. And also our words and various well-worn, inherited dichotomies are both semantically interdependent and mobile, a fog of the b...
March 13, 2022 at 16:38
I think you are correct and that your capitalization is appropriate. Idealism is (often) a continuation of religion through increased abstraction. The...
March 13, 2022 at 16:38
The materialist is the guy who doesn't think he will win the lottery just because he bought a ticket. To the materialist, the (religious) idealist is ...
March 13, 2022 at 16:38
The path with flowers on it is that of the rejection of the existence of thoughts. This is not the rejection of language, which would be even more off...
March 13, 2022 at 16:37
The mind is a terrible thing to chase.
March 13, 2022 at 16:37
Perhaps you project, sir. There are approximately 450 to 500 million nonbelievers worldwide, including both positive and negative atheists, or roughly...
March 13, 2022 at 16:32
Genuine speculation is less annoying and perhaps less common than hawking the next flavor of informagical kool-aid.
March 13, 2022 at 16:32