You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

S

Comments

Nigel Farage trolled by caller.
September 25, 2019 at 20:51
You’re going to believe what you want anyways.
September 25, 2019 at 18:47
You misspelt "SUVREY".
September 25, 2019 at 18:15
Yes?
September 25, 2019 at 18:04
In: Brexit  — view comment
Nooooooooooo! That's evil! :scream:
September 25, 2019 at 17:14
But it's his perspective which is the problem. Ordinary language wins out because it causes less problems. He's having to go out of his way to make hi...
September 25, 2019 at 17:01
All things contrary to good sense can touch a nerve for me. The topic could have been about almost anything, but if it's absurd then I'm not the type ...
September 25, 2019 at 16:40
Okay. It might have touched a nerve, but certainly not based on your presumptuous suggestion that women being sexually independent from men is so scar...
September 25, 2019 at 16:12
It's really not a small semantic point. It's very important. Getting that wrong is pretty offensive.
September 25, 2019 at 15:58
Yes indeed, otherwise it's a huge misnomer, and should instead be called political sexual abstinence, not political lesbianism. There's a huge differe...
September 25, 2019 at 15:55
And where do I fall in that? You have no idea how inappropriate those comments could be. How much do you know about me?
September 25, 2019 at 15:52
I certainly didn't miss that, and it certainly doesn't change my assessment of the opening post. It's not viable if there are much better, more sensib...
September 25, 2019 at 15:42
I know that this was for him, because he's the one with the problem. But I just want to jump in to say what most of us already know, which is that, in...
September 25, 2019 at 15:30
But you should, because a) it was obvious from the context (I'm pretty sure others aren't having the problem that you're having here), and because b) ...
September 25, 2019 at 15:20
Yes. An example of this would be earlier on when Terrapin revealed that he has got the nature of reason completely wrong, in that he thinks that it's ...
September 25, 2019 at 14:46
No, that's not what it is by definition. But yes, if something not too far removed from my own view happens to be sensible, then it's sensible. And if...
September 25, 2019 at 14:37
No it doesn't, it means only that you're choosing to go by an interpretation which leads to that conclusion. You're the cause of your own problem, nam...
September 25, 2019 at 14:31
Please stop doing that. Again, it's not helping. It's just an annoying distraction. I've made my meaning clear enough to you. Go with that, not someth...
September 25, 2019 at 14:24
Yes, that's more or the less a problem we've been having. I'm saying, sure, metaethical subjectivism, but let's be sensible. He's basically saying, no...
September 25, 2019 at 13:57
You're talking past me again, and that's a problem. I agree with that, but that's beside the point. I wasn't using the phrase "anything goes" in that ...
September 25, 2019 at 13:43
It's not. That suggests that anyone who is a metaethical subjectivist or noncognitivist must adhere to the senseless 'anything goes' version which you...
September 25, 2019 at 13:09
But it very obviously wouldn't work as a test, because it would allow all kinds of nonsense, such as no crimes beginning with "m". And if you're takin...
September 25, 2019 at 12:44
You're completely missing the point, and going back over our discussion, I think I've found where the problem originated. It should have been very obv...
September 25, 2019 at 12:30
Anyone who doesn't know what hate is is a moron. And anyone who says they haven't ever felt hatred is a liar.
September 25, 2019 at 11:53
You suggested that they're equal when you suggested that anything goes. And you suggested that when you said that the view that there shouldn't be any...
September 25, 2019 at 11:36
But what I'm saying doesn't have to be objectively correct for it to be right over and above the opinion of someone who says something completely barm...
September 25, 2019 at 11:22
There are degrees of understanding, and I don't think that it's controversial to say that we wouldn't be capable of fully understanding a concept to t...
September 25, 2019 at 10:15
Yes, that which has that funky beat must exist in entirety before one can boogie woogie thereof.
September 25, 2019 at 09:51
I'm going to drive a metaphysical wedge between music and dancing to music. They're not the same!
September 25, 2019 at 09:46
In: Brexit  — view comment
Since you mention UK history, it's reminiscent of King Charles I dissolving parliament against its will, and we know what that lead to.
September 25, 2019 at 09:36
What you're attempting to do here is redundant. What you're doing here is once again pointlessly bringing to our attention another distinction of whic...
September 25, 2019 at 09:19
Philosophers would rather be in their study on their own writing a lengthy treatise on something that doesn't matter. Conclusion: philosophers aren't ...
September 25, 2019 at 09:01
You're discouraging us from being logical, and honest, on a philosophy forum of all places. No, in answer to your question, certainly not. And to top ...
September 25, 2019 at 08:52
That's my line. Please don't use it without my permission. So they're all depressed because they're not all depressed, because some of them are conten...
September 25, 2019 at 08:46
No, I don't think you can lump them all together like that and jump to that conclusion. Like I said, in some cases, they're largely lying to themselve...
September 25, 2019 at 08:37
This isn't exactly helping. I would welcome sensible discussion on feminism.
September 25, 2019 at 08:27
Yes. They're lying to themselves. They'll come up with elaborate answers to avoid having to admit that life ain't that bad. It's all misdirection: smo...
September 25, 2019 at 08:14
Well language isn't necessarily moving, for starters. That would be an odd way to describe language, so not the best description of what language is. ...
September 25, 2019 at 07:59
Damn. You win this one. I wish I'd have thought of putting it that way. :lol:
September 25, 2019 at 07:55
I think that that's a totally ridiculous and unnecessary way to tackle problems to do with the stereotypes of gender roles, problems in the bedroom, u...
September 25, 2019 at 07:51
I said that a crunch is alright, but it's not as good as a "Ni!". And what I meant by that is that you need to work on your ability to correctly ident...
September 25, 2019 at 07:40
Well how noble of you. Whatever my shortcomings may be, I at least can correctly identify a red herring.
September 25, 2019 at 07:33
Hmm. You wouldn't just be telling me what you think I want to hear, would you? :brow: And I hope that's not sarcasm I detect. See me after class!
September 25, 2019 at 07:26
I just don't believe that. I think that you often fail to recognise the problems which arise as a result of your unusual premises, and you compound th...
September 25, 2019 at 07:16
Well don't be. You're a big boy now. Just learn from your mistake and move on.
September 25, 2019 at 07:08
Yes, but that's irrelevant. It obviously didn't exist in it's entirety beforehand. An entire novel of that size consists of hundreds of pages, and it'...
September 25, 2019 at 06:58
I suppose the statement is ambiguous enough to result in different answers. I was assuming that in this example, the "report" would be the novel itsel...
September 25, 2019 at 06:56
You mean elicited, not elucidated.
September 25, 2019 at 06:50
Maybe yours can't. You must have one of those less evolved cats without arms and the ability to speak. Well maybe your cat likes things she can't tast...
September 25, 2019 at 06:49
Okay. You should look up what a red herring is, though. Because giving an example of why I believe what I do alongside my explanation of why I believe...
September 25, 2019 at 06:41