That interpretation is fine with me. But under that interpretation, the presumed choice still seems to appear out of thin air without explanation. How...
Can you tell me what the first definition is when you type "strawman" into Google? And then, can you tell me what I said about how you phrased your st...
Sure, and I suppose you weren't suggesting anything, either. No one is suggesting anything at all. Funnily enough, the frequency of which I accuse oth...
Wrong. It was clearly a loaded question. Don't play dumb. My response is to recognise it as such. I don't think I need to enlighten anyone here. We al...
Strawman phrased as a question. It would be effective action, under the right circumstances. Otherwise it would likely be unsuccessful or even counter...
More practical than banning people, but still incredibly impractical considering human nature, the history of humanity, recent widely reported events,...
No, I'm continuing to see the absurdity of your recent contributions. It's not all or nothing, and one doesn't have to commit to trucks being banned a...
No, I don't think that that suggests choice at all. It's not like presenting an option, and endorsing one of the options. It's setting out what's reas...
Sensible and practical solutions to the problem are welcome. Talk of banning people or "assault trucks" doesn't qualify, and is the noise I referred t...
Sure, guns are designed to shoot bullets, swords are designed to cut, bombs are designed to explode. Let's just ignore the elephant in the room. :roll...
Yes. You have some control over what you read, look at, think about, and so on, but you have no control over what you are or are not convinced by. I c...
I don't know which claim is more ludicrous: that there's such a thing as assault trucks or that guns aren't typically designed to kill people. If ther...
I think so, for more or less the same reason as that given by Wayfarer in the first paragraph of his first reply. The notion of picking beliefs strike...
It's not like this Sanders lady didn't know what she was getting herself into when she decided to attend the event. Should the comedian have run her g...
Mistakes involving firearms wouldn't happen if the firearms weren't there to begin with. So that's the goal. Pragmatically, the discussion should be a...
One of life's great mysteries. We need more discussions about sld. What is it? Where does it come from? What does it taste like? How do we worship it?...
Yes, but that's changing the topic from when a cat is feline to when a cat is thought of as feline. And, obviously, if you change the premise by inser...
Literally? No, obviously not. Figuratively? Conventionally, no, obviously not. You think with your head and feel with your heart. What if fish could f...
Cute. Far from blatant, it's untenable. And your argument certainly does not demonstrate the above conclusion. You can give as many examples as you li...
By the way, using the that-clause like this is not really anything special. It's a common way of expressing or referring to facts, and is recognised i...
Yes, and those are worded much better. I voted for, "Both are wrong/it's complicated", because both are wrong, although Yadoula's own quote, in a sens...
I don't mind you butting in, but I do mind you butting in with only a trivial point about grammar which misses the point and an ironic accusation of c...
Well, that's one way of explaining it, but I'm not convinced. It seems as though you're putting the cart before the horse, in that it seems as though ...
Comments