AgentTangarine

Newton's third law. You push and it pushes back. But who pushes first?

That's Kaku's mind resonating. :smile:

Dunno... Looking at some internet sites for boys only this can be called into question. Maria Madame Wu Lise Meitner Jeane d'Arc Barbarella Grandma Mo...

It's not enough just to watch. The models of weather are not models of climate. If the model predicts a 3 degree increase in temperature that temperat...

But it allows for rational discussion and beneficial growth of ideas.

You actually mirror the vector in a mirror, like a straight arrow. In curved spacetime the vector becomes an object with variable length..You inverse ...

The "point" is that constructing a continuum out of points seems like a pseudoscience to me. The fact that the line, plane or volume have the same car...

Haha! Hi there! Great questions! The bot will reflect while walking the dog... :wink:

If there is no first moment then that doesn't imply there is no second. Each second moment needs a predecessor. Which can be a first moment. But as a ...

Most universals are created. Only after the fact they are called universals. It depends on the people if they are valued or not. Correct me if I'm wro...

A person can hold the believe that the door is closed and claim it while the door is closed. Her neural network will differ from the people who rightl...

Then viruses have to be there in the first place. The man can take them away by sucking them up or attract them to his skin. But the increased volume ...

What if I asked the question, as a new thread, if the continuum can be broken in parts? It's maybe a math question. Maybe not. It will not alter the e...

That's exactly what I not do. I question it. That's all. I have been given no satisfactory answer though. Jgill came close. But the bijection he presc...

That's exactly what I have done. And didn't agree with. But it's clear now. Thanks to my opponent. I don't agree with him though.

Yes. I get that. Still... something is nagging. If I map all naturals on (there you go...) what do I leave out? seems to contain more numbers than : 0...

The bijection between R and RxR is not continuous.

Now that feeling comes close to a mathematical contemplation.

But the pattern of sound coming from them can't be caught into a superposition of sines. Unless the music consists out of sine waves in the first plac...

Okay: 0.1 connects with 1 0.2 connects with 2 0.3 connects with 3 . . . 0.14 with 14 0.15 with 15 . . 0.53 with 53 0.54 with 54 . . 0.768 with 768 0.7...

No. I mean: why can't N be mapped onto 0.1-1 (or 0.1-0.9999999999.....). I use every member of N one time.

Okay, last time. Between 0.1 and 0.99999.... you use all numbers of N; 1,2,3,....9999999..... Are there more numbers? It's a 1-1 map! Strangely enough...

The diagonol proof doesn’t apply here. I was thinkiñg that too. The interval I talk about is 0.1 to 1. Not zero to 1.

I was a bit angry when I wrote that! Forget it! I don't even know you! There is a 1-1 function from N onto (the interval from 0.1 to 1). Isn't there?

The intergalactic blow job...eeeehhh... galactic lightning struck fan. When the galactic black hole shitty hits it. Paaaarty time... Let's do the Webb...

But where am I wrong in my proof? Cannot N be mapped onto 0.1-1? You ñeed N numbers for that: 1-99999999.... What number do I leave out here? Or do I ...

I mean, where am I wrong if I say that N^3 can be mapped on R?

I think it's the continuum that confuses me, and its break-up into (onto?) its parts. I think the break-up of a square into lines is the same as a lin...

In fact, I like that theorem!

You can map N to all reals between 0.1 and 0.999999... You can do this N times (for all smaller decimals). You can do this for all N size one interval...

Yeah, you are right about that! Sorry that I called you dogmatic and exclusionary! You certainly got me interested in this aleph topic! As a physicist...

On the contrary. I even told you I contradict myself in previous posts. I never told you to consider other posts. Anyhow... I'm truly tired and my bel...

You don't need the diagonal proof to realize that. Every real number can be mapped from N^3. Every real number can be reached from N^3. N^3 can be map...

I wrote: Well, the point made is that a pair of numbers (x,y)... Where did I do that? It's you who is the crank. You are exclusionary and dogmatic. An...

Sounds good mr. Gill. Almost convincing. But you construct a new number from the both. Giving them both different decimal places. The diagonal proof o...

Well, the point made is that a pair of numbers (x,y) say (0.678567..., 0,98678...) is contained in a single number 0.65456456.... The infinite number ...

L The point is that the proof in quora is incorrect. It's making use of decimal expansions also but overlooks the majority of them.

It could be that a new bang awaits behind us. If the universe expands because it does so on a 4d space. When the present universe has accelerated into...

Well... I don't take it too seriously... You are probably right. Still, I can't see how R and RxR can have the same cardinality. There are just inf^3 ...

There are a lot of good books indeed. Thanks for the references. I prefer the math use in physics though. And the alephity of the continuum has implic...

Indeed. So N can't be mapped 1-1 onto. You can at most map N to infinite points, infinite times. Say 1 into 2, 2 into 4, 3 into 6, etc. But into still...

I can map N onto R infinite times infinite times. Infinite times onto . . . So infinite times onto . The map even defines . Times infinity for all len...

There you go.

Huh?

Still, I can map N onto R. Inf^3 times even...

I got it from the net...

Haha! In Hilbert's hotel! Wrong post...

I now even think R has cardinality aleph1.4! You guys need to get a hotel room. — jgill Haha! In Hilbert's hotel!

"The mapping of 'f' is said to be onto if every element of Y is the f-image of at least one element of X." Y=R, N=X...

No. I assert card(R)=aleph1.4. Call me crazy, like you wish. Card(RxR)=aleph2.6, more or less. 2^(1.4)=3, more or less, 2^(2.6)=6, more or less. I can...