neomac

The problem is that you can not soundly prove your claims. You can not soundly prove that I'm conflating statements and beliefs, that I'm misrendering...

One has to prove that neo-nazi problem exists, if it is relevant and to whom. Neo-nazi activists are present both in Russia and all western countries,...

I didn't talk about existence, but about relevance on a negotiation table as you seemed interested to discuss.

Unfortunately for you, my objections to your ignoratio elenchi fallacy do not depend on my theory as I clearly stated: Which I'm not questioning. Inde...

> What it does mean is that it might represent a good diplomatic lever in any peace negotiations. It depends on how relevant is the lever. And the cla...

A logic reader will understand that you are not logic.

A logic reader will understand that I'm not conflating anything. And it's precisely b/c I'm not conflating belief and statements that I can prove wher...

A logic reader will understand that you simply failed to understand the purpose of my critique. A logic reader will understand that your highlighting ...

About the denazification of Ukraine... let's also hear what the Ukrainian Jews have to say about it: (source) (source)

"'diminished' Russia" is a dubious expression b/c it has to do with the potential ambitions of Russia to reach a superpower status on the global geopo...

Both of your claims sound correct as much as the 4 following ones: If all propositions can possibly be either true or false, and false propositions ca...

2 examples of inappropriate quotations: My sentence was creatively chopped out by a deranged soul. Taken in its context, my claim was referring to a d...

> At time t1, the individual believes that that particular clock is a working one. It is not. The individual's belief is false. False belief cannot po...

This is a very messy argument. But before tossing it into the trash bin (along with all your other catastrophic arguments), let’s clarify a few points...

You are taking it too personally, sir. I had fun primarily in being articulate, clear, focused, logic and versatile while formulating my objections ag...

Look, I didn't mean to wreck your self-confidence. You put yourself into a corner, despite my repeated warnings, and started beating yourself with suc...

Here other objections: The major problem of your definition of “belief” , among others, is that - in a case of belief based on ignorance of the releva...

> This notion of "belief" cannot take account of language less, mistaken, and/or false belief . A mistaken creature's point of view does not - dare I ...

Where? can you give me a few links? The challenge is: can you justify that claim in a way that is understandable to me (based on assumptions that we b...

Meaning? "Thus" expresses the idea that you are logically inferring your claim "a proper rendering of Jack's belief ..." from "Jack was mistaken" and ...

> Maybe I am right if you do not. Of course, your claims may be correct even if you didn't demonstrate to me any good argument to support them. What I...

This objection is maybe based on my poor phrasing. I re-edited my text to better express what I wanted to say.

I misunderstood your argument because this is how you presented it: Jack believes that broken clock is working. The above report is in proper linguist...

@"creativesoul" Let's not forget that you made the following claim: So I would expect you to prove that "Jack believes that broken clock is working" i...

Well if we accept all your premises (and I haven't accepted any so far) maybe you are right, yet it doesn't prove that your report is accurate. I poin...

> That question makes no sense on my view. Then we need your theory of meaning and truth for you to establish when sentences are true, false , or nece...

Here another objection for you: you claim that “At time t1, Jack believed that broken clock was working” is accurate based on the idea that the proper...

> Jack cannot knowingly believe "that broken clock is working" is true, because it is a contradiction in terms, necessarily false, etc. That's all abo...

I'm not talking about the sentence "That broken clock is working", I'm talking about the proper linguistic form that you claim to be impossible to kno...

> I'll answer whatever questions you like, so long as they follow from what I'm arguing or are just plain ole simple questions about basic facts that ...

I might conflate whatever you see me conflating if you continue to frame my questions. But I will return to such a claim of yours later because I susp...

try again (6th time):

Then quote yourself when you explain what "is working" stands for. Because this is what I asked. And if you not find it, that's because you did not an...

Not to mention that there is lots to learn from the history of Mona Lisa frames too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mona_Lisa#Frame https://artjourneyp...

.

No. In the example "Jack believes that clock is working", the belief content is the fitness condition expressed by the completive clause, so it's the ...

Impossible? We are discussing here if "that clock is working" is more or less accurate than "that broken clock is working". The full account I'm askin...

Presumably because also the floors are worth watching. https://www.google.com/search?q=sistine+chapel+floor&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwjKyamp8ZP2AhUEkFwKHcmZ...

I answered that already. Belief contents express the point of view (the intrinsic fitness conditions) of Jack's believing attitudes which best explain...

I asked you to give me the full non-propositional content which Jack is not aware of believe and can not knowingly believe true when you claim of him ...

> try harder What for? > Why are you crossing out 'Reason' and replacing it with 'reason'? It's 'Reason' not 'reason'. The source of normative reasons...

Notice that this claim is a de re belief ascription analogous to "Jack believes of that broken clock that is working" (which I was talking about a whi...

Yes I do.

> But you need it spelt out as it is not immediately apparent to you. Like I say, a bad sign! Ma’am can you intellect that is not a moral imperative o...

So you do not claim that “At t1, Jack believes that broken clock is working” is more accurate than “At t1, Jack believes that clock is working”? Becau...

Indeed, there is loss of explanatory power, b/c by removing those parts you are attributing to Jack a contradictory belief so you can not distinguish ...

First three methodological considerations: 1. If you want to answer my questions you should specify which ones by quoting them and then answer them. I...

I don't care if he is a troll. He's got the intellectual creepiness of a troll, though. I don't know what you are referring to when talking about the ...

I can handle trolls. And also trolls might have interesting things to say.

> No, it is valid. Of course it's invalid, no matter how many times you keep boring us with your stupid claim. You should formalise your first argumen...