You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Moliere

Comments

M'kay. I'll focus on those, though not today. I've been responding with my first thoughts rather than digging in. Sorry if that's distracting.
May 17, 2025 at 17:52
Fair. Tho this gets a bit into some of my disagreements -- an essentialist has to have an idea of mind? Intentions, actualized understanding, experien...
May 17, 2025 at 17:48
Because Aristotle believed water to have a teleology which put it above Earth, and air above water, and fire above air. The reason water goes where it...
May 17, 2025 at 17:45
I disagree, but also I don't think it matters that I disagree because I clearly put them forward thinking them convincing :D When they are not. I don'...
May 17, 2025 at 17:35
I like the example of a quarter because it takes it out of the realm of abstract science and into the realm of our everyday understanding. I'd use Yah...
May 17, 2025 at 17:28
Heh, maybe. I don't think I'd be wise enough to be able to tell if indeterminism comes after determinism, or elsewise. What I know is that you have to...
May 17, 2025 at 17:25
Well, I for one have a question -- namely that it uses probablity and you have to do the experiment to find out which "world" you happen to be in. I p...
May 17, 2025 at 17:17
Seems a bit outlandish, so I certainly couldn't claim that. But I'd put it in historicist terms -- we can imagine Kripke being transplanted to another...
May 17, 2025 at 17:15
OK, got it. I thought you were claiming it rather than saying there's a possible interpretation of the equation such that determinism is true.
May 17, 2025 at 17:11
It says it, but how do we know it's true?
May 17, 2025 at 17:07
Heh, no. In school I solved the Schrodinger equation in the one and only case that it's analytic as an exercise -- one proton and one electron. So rat...
May 17, 2025 at 16:09
Huh, that's interesting. I'd be inclined to say "potability" is, in large parts, what people mean by "water", though not always. In a way this is just...
May 17, 2025 at 15:29
The Schrodinger equation is not deterministic, by my understanding -- unless probability distributions as events are somehow deterministic, but that s...
May 17, 2025 at 15:21
I understand that it's not deterministic, but that's probably contributing to our misunderstandings.
May 17, 2025 at 15:02
Well, you can't, you see -- that's what I'm getting at. We can say these things, but there's no way of telling which is what -- why am I in the up and...
May 17, 2025 at 14:20
It's a point about how there are a posteriori necessary truths -- it doesn't say that water is H2O; it's not relying upon the science for its point. O...
May 17, 2025 at 14:18
I don't think he hopes to apply it to reality as much as he's making a point about logic. It's a subtle point, but he wasn't talking about reality as ...
May 16, 2025 at 18:50
To be fair to -- I didn't think he was claiming a conspiracy theory as much as thinking that philosophers make this claim because scientists have made...
May 16, 2025 at 18:44
I (mostly) agree. the last bit I disagree with. Where you say: I don't think that's true, because philosophers have no need of gaining credibility fro...
May 16, 2025 at 18:24
If it's a strawman then I must do the reading until I respond for reals. Given my commitments I'm not doing it anytime soon, but I'll stop responding ...
May 16, 2025 at 18:18
Just brushing over the last 3 pages: Modern science can be integrated into the Aristotelian framework, of course. I'm still sensing the same transcend...
May 16, 2025 at 17:58
When we don't have that level of description -- namely, before chemistry became popular. In Aristotle "water" does not mean H2O, for example -- it's j...
May 16, 2025 at 17:42
I don't think so -- and obviously the stochastic process is more complex than flipping a quarter -- but I do think that I'm me and not you simply cuz ...
May 16, 2025 at 17:36
Cool. I'll be honest in saying I don't think I'll be reading these anytime soon, but she looks interesting to me -- I like the notion that the medieva...
May 16, 2025 at 17:33
:D Sounds to me like a transcendental error -- if they speak in this way, with nouns and such and believe it's true, then they must believe in essence...
May 16, 2025 at 17:21
I'm me and not you cuz there was a percentage chance I was you, and a percentage chance I was me -- and I just happened to flip heads.
May 16, 2025 at 17:13
You may be able to, but I cannot understand why Many Worlds is deterministic for the reason I said -- why am I in the up-world and not the down-world?...
May 16, 2025 at 15:31
Heh. I suppose we just see probability differently then -- your dice example reminded me of my quarter example, but whereas you want many worlds to ex...
May 16, 2025 at 09:06
I'm not sure -- but I am certain that analogies between computer programs and reality are basically misleading, at least in our day and age. More dire...
May 16, 2025 at 08:54
I think it's a bit silly, but in the same way my question about universe 1/2 is silly. Not bad or wrong but a bit outlandish, is all I mean there. I'm...
May 16, 2025 at 06:18
Mkay. Wouldn't we be able to ask "Why am I in universe 1 rather than universe 2?" ? Is there an answer to that question in the many-worlds interpretat...
May 16, 2025 at 06:10
:D I'll cap it there for tonight. I can't say either way, but the idea makes me smile cuz it makes sense -- tho I suspect I could find a point of disa...
May 16, 2025 at 05:51
Given what we're reading -- I can excuse it because Husserl was before Auschwitz, and even suffered due to a certain H. turning him into the Nazi part...
May 16, 2025 at 05:37
:rofl:
May 16, 2025 at 05:31
Philosophy is footnotes to Aristotle? :D I get that feeling at times -- tho I disagree with it of course. So later phenomenology decided to be right r...
May 16, 2025 at 05:29
And jokes.
May 16, 2025 at 04:11
LMAO at the bit. First time hearing it, and I got a good gut laugh out of it. Naw. No point in doing so when they live out their beliefs, I think. The...
May 16, 2025 at 03:11
O no. My fam knows. "In-between" in the sense that my folks believe, and I see how my beliefs are tied to that tradition -- it's not like I was born o...
May 16, 2025 at 02:55
This is where I fall into an in-between -- I reject it because I was brought up to believe in it, and yet I don't reject my folks belief. I don't care...
May 16, 2025 at 02:34
I started looking but forget where I read it -- Adorno said something about how philosophy is all about seeing the obvious in different ways, so that ...
May 16, 2025 at 00:07
I, for one, am happy to draw you back into Adorno. :D
May 15, 2025 at 23:57
https://thebasecamp.substack.com/p/attention-is-first-philosophy Interesting reflection from a fellow traveler.
May 15, 2025 at 23:55
@"Joshs"
May 15, 2025 at 23:31
The dialectic of progressively weakening my claim....
May 15, 2025 at 23:30
M'kay. I agree that there's no particular reason for the physical constants or starting conditions of the universe. I don't know why you'd claim our p...
May 15, 2025 at 22:52
This is a theme I'm enjoying throughout -- not an assumption so much, but a Background belief that need not be demonstrated at all. I'm enjoying it be...
May 15, 2025 at 22:08
Excellent summary. My thoughts are still so scatterbrained I appreciate these synopses. If we take Marx as an Orthodox sage -- It seems that even in c...
May 15, 2025 at 13:40
Suppose the many-worlds interpretation -- is "It was down because you're in the down-electron universe, whereas another version of you is in the up-el...
May 15, 2025 at 13:30
I guess it'd depend upon what you want out of your sufficiency. I'm inclined to say that if the probability distribution of an event is consistent bet...
May 15, 2025 at 12:45
Going back over LND5 I'm thinking I'm sympathetic to Adorno's take on theory/practice -- I certainly agree that "practice" can become a kind of fetish...
May 14, 2025 at 14:09